×

TVS Apache RR 310 vs Yamaha R15 V3 Comparison

TVS Apache RR 310 vs Yamaha R15 V3

TVS Apache RR 310 Price starts at Rs. 2.28 lakh which is Rs. 87,120 costlier than Yamaha YZF R15 V3 priced at Rs. 1.41 lakh. The claimed mileage for the TVS Apache RR 310 is 31 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha YZF R15 V3 is 48.8 kmpl. In technical specifications, TVS Apache RR 310 is powered by 312.2 cc engine where as Yamaha YZF R15 V3 is powered by 155 cc engine. TVS Apache RR 310 is available in 1 different colours while Yamaha YZF R15 V3 comes with 1 colours. 60% users have chosen TVS Apache RR 310 over Yamaha YZF R15 V3 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare TVS Apache RR 310 vs Yamaha YZF R15 V3 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

Apache RR 310 vs YZF R15 V3 Specs Overview

Specs/Features Apache RR 310 ABSYZF R15 V3 Moto GP Limited Edition
Price Rs. 2.28 lakh Rs. 1.43 lakh
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, Reverse Inclined DOHC, SI Engine Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, SOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 312.2 cc 155 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 34 PS @ 9700 rpm 19.3 PS @ 10000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
0-60 kmph (sec) 2.93s 3.40s
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, Reverse Inclined DOHC, SI Engine Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, SOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 312.2 cc 155 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 34 PS @ 9700 rpm 19.3 PS @ 10000 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm) 27.3 Nm @ 7700 rpm 14.7 Nm @ 8500 rpm
Emission Type bs4 bs4
Bore 80 mm 58 mm
Stroke 62.1 mm 58.7 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 4 4
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Ignition Dynamically controlled integrated high energy ignition system TCI (Transistor controlled ignition)
Compression Ratio 10.9:1 11.6:1
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 6 Speed 6-Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
0-60 kmph (sec) 2.93s 3.40s
Quarter Mile 15.20 s @ 137.33 kmph 17.37s@118.83kmph
Braking (60-0 kmph) 20.69m 19.93 mm
Braking (80-0 kmph) 37.49m 34.15 mm
Braking (100-0 kmph) ... 51.67 mm
Mileage (City) 31 kmpl 48.75 kmpl
Mileage (Highway) 35.9 kmpl 47.92 kmpl
Mileage (Overall) 35 kmpl 45 kmpl
0-100 kmph (sec) 7.17s 11.42s
Braking 60-0 km/h 20.69m 19.93 mm
Suspension-Front Inverted Cartridge Telescopic Fork Telescopic Fork
Chassis Trellis frame, split chassis Delta Box
Suspension-Rear Two Arm Aluminium Die-Cast Swingarm, Mono Tube, Floating Piston Gas Assisted Shock Absorber Swingarm
Tyre Size Front :-110/70-R17 Rear :-150/60-R17 Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70-17
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) 32 psi ...
Length*Width*Height 2001*786*1135 1990*725*1135
Wheelbase(mm) 1365 mm 1325 mm
Length 2001 mm 1990 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 180 mm 170 mm
Height 1135 mm 1135 mm
Seat Height 810 mm 815 mm
Width 786 mm 725 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 11 L 11 L
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 300 mm 282 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 240 mm 220 mm
Battery Type Maintenance Free ETZ-5
Pilot Lamps ...
LED tail lights
Turn Signal Lamp LED Bulb
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Body Type Sports Bikes Sports Bikes
Body Graphics ...
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Split Split
Pass Switch
Speedometer Digital Digital
Handle Type Two Piece Forged Handle Bar ...
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock Digital
Low Battery Indicator ...
Stepup Seat
Low Oil Indicator ...
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights LED Projector ...
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid Cooled
Console Digital Digital
Odometer Digital Digital
Mobile Connectivity ...

Also Read Comparison Reviews of :

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which one is better between R15 V3 and RS200?
  • We rode the new R15 v3.0 on both the racetrack and in the real world. While the R15 has grown larger and more powerful, it needs a certain level of expertise to tame. The more committed ergonomics make for an uncomfortable ride in the city. If you are looking for a dynamically competent bike that you’d like to hone your riding skills on and don't mind the committed riding position, the Yamaha R15 v 3.0 is the one to go for. It's a bike we'd love to have in our garage but its ergonomics limit its practicality. On the other hand, the Bajaj Pulsar RS200 certainly scores a few brownie points when it comes to engine refinement and performance. It is also well loaded with nifty features such as projector headlamps with LED DRLs, a backlit semi-digital instrument console and ABS. All in all, those looking for an affordable, fully-faired bike with sporty characteristics, the RS200 is certainly an attractive buy. Read More: - Yamaha R15 v3.0 Road Test Review: https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/yamaha-r15-v30-road-test-review/30566 - 2017 Bajaj Pulsar RS 200: First Ride Review: https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/2017-bajaj-pulsar-rs-200-first-ride-review/27398
  • Now r15 v3 it has the race DNA and track ergonomics.Yamaha this time didnt compromise performance for looks as in a v2.Its the best in 150 cc segment..Rc 200 is a track oriented race machine if you are a beginner go for r15.rv is a great choice which can be compared to Apache rtr or cbr 350 or rr 310 from the.
  • If you want more aggressive riding posture and you are corner enthusiastic then you should go for r15 v3 and you can also do weekend rides on it if you want want to go for long rides without taking many stops then rs200 is a good option
View All Answers
Q. Which one is the best bike Yamaha R15 V3 or Yamaha MT-15?
  • Yamaha YZF R15 is more of a track based bike with a rider tucked in whereas the MT-15 is all about the sports and everyday touring with a more comfortable riding position. If you are looking for a bike to ride in the city as well as on the race track with a bit less aggressive racing ergonomics go with the naked sports Yamaha MT-15 but if you are looking for a bike with sporty edges, full of torque and Sporty Stance go with the Yamaha R15 V3. Moreover, we would suggest you take a test ride of both the bikes so that you may evaluate the bikes on the basis of your outlook toward the ride quality, features and comfort.Click here to get a detailed comparison: https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/yamaha-mt-15-vs-yamaha-yzf-r15-v3 Click here for the dealer details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers/Yamaha
  • Of course it's R15V3 which is value for money as compared to MT15... But you may get riding position problem for atleast 1week because of the new riding position..... We need to become more suitable For every new environment we get in to..
  • Depends upon you as both the bikes offer the same power and performance. On 1 hand MT-15 is lighter than the R15 v3 but also R15 v3 is more streamline which means it is more aerodynamic which decreases its fuel consumption. Also MT-15 is a naked bike and has a better sitting position.
View All Answers
Q. Which is better between KTM RC390 & APACHE RR 310?
  • Apache RR 310, despite being designed as a track focussed bike, is quite usable in the city thanks to its torquey and tractable motor. It offers a good balance between ride and handling as well. While brakes lack initial feel, they offer good bite. Another issue is vibrations around the 6000rpm range, which TVS has reduced to a fair degree. It is a good option to the focussed KTM RC 390, trading a bit of performance for everyday usability. KTM 390 Duke has always come across as a value for money product and the new variant takes the VFM quotient a notch up as it looks a lot more irresistible now. It gets an LED headlight unit and colour display that we like a lot and also handles beautifully with its aptly tuned suspension setup. Also, while it may not be as quick as the earlier 390, it certainly is a lot more refined. Between the TNT 300 and the KTM 390 Duke, the Benelli comes across as a motorcycle for people looking for a more relaxed way of commuting. The 390 Duke on the other hand is a wild beast and is meant for a lot more experienced riders and thrill seekers. Though, we would suggest you to take a test ride in order to pick one.
  • The Apache RR 310, despite being designed as a track focussed bike, is quite usable in the city thanks to its torquey and tractable motor. It offers a good balance between ride and handling as well. While brakes lack initial feel, they offer good bite. Another issue is vibrations around the 6000rpm range, which TVS has reduced to a fair degree. While the KTM RC 390 has a upper hand in terms of power and is priced higher than the Apache RR 310, it packs in a lot more punch packed with more tech and is also a pure track-focused machine. It has remained a go-to option for riders looking for a dedicated track tool owing to its ergonomics, suspension setup and handling characteristics. Moreover, we would suggest you take a test ride in order to check riding comfort. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://bit.ly/2jv2aXQ
  • KTM's RC 390 is definitely the best performer because both power and torque outputs of the RC are higher than the RR310. However, you would be in trouble if you buy an RC390 for daily commute or long rides. The heat dissipation system in the RC is too bad to handle in the regular daily city traffic and the RC 's committed riding posture and the fuel tank capacity are a big negative if you are buying one for long rides. Apache RR310 will be the best performer for regular city rides and long rides while the RC will be the top performer if you are a track rider.
View All Answers
View More Questions