×

Suzuki Intruder vs TVS Apache 200 4V Race Comparison

Suzuki Intruder vs TVS Apache 200 4V Race

TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 Price starts at Rs. 1.12 lakh which is Rs. 10,482 costlier than Suzuki Intruder priced at Rs. 1.01 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Suzuki Intruder is 47.6 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 is NA. In technical specifications, Suzuki Intruder is powered by 154.9 cc engine where as TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 is powered by 197.75 cc engine. Suzuki Intruder is available in 1 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 comes with 8 colours. 56% users have chosen TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 over Suzuki Intruder in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Suzuki Intruder vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

Engine Type 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, Air-cooled SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled Engine
Engine Displacement (CC) 154.9 cc 197.75 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 14.8 PS @ 8000 rpm 20.5 PS @ 8500 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm) 14 Nm @ 6000 rpm 18.1 Nm @ 7000 rpm
Bore 56 mm 66 mm
Stroke 62.9 mm 57.8 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 2 4
Fuel System
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Ignition IDI - Multi curve digital Ignition
Compression Ratio 9.7:1
Engine Immobilizer
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 5 Speed 5 Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Braking Type
0-60 kmph (sec) 5.73s 3.95s
Quarter Mile 19.91 s @ 103.51 kmph
Braking (60-0 kmph) 21.51m
20-80 kmph (kickdown)
30-70 kmph (3rd gear)
40-80 kmph (4th gear)
Braking (80-0 kmph) 38.38m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
Mileage (City) 47.6 kmpl
Mileage (Highway) 54 kmpl
Mileage (Overall) 58 kmpl
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl
0-100 kmph (sec) 17.93s
Top Speed (Km/h)
0-160 kmph
Braking 60-0 km/h 21.51m
Chassis Type
Suspension-Front Telescopic Telescopic with Hydraulic dampers
Chassis Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF
Suspension-Rear Swing Arm Type Mono shock suspension
Tyre Size Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/60-17 Front :-90/90-17 Rear :-130/70-17
Wheel Size Front :-17 inch Rear :-17 inch Front :-17 inch Rear :-17 inch
Tyre Make
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Cast Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Dry Weight
Length*Width*Height 2130*805*1095 2018*790*1105
Wheelbase(mm) 1405 mm 1353 mm
Length 2130 mm 2018 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 170 mm 180 mm
Height 1095 mm 1105 mm
Seat Height 740 mm 800 mm
Width 805 mm 790 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 11 L 12 L
Kerb Weight
Total Weight
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 270 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 240 mm
Battery Type Maintenance Free
Charging Time
Motor Type
Motor Power
Fast Charging
Battery
Range
Head Lamp
Projector head light
Pilot Lamps
LED tail lights
Seat Opening Switch
Boot Light
Turn Signal Lamp Bulb LED
Alternator
Power Modes
Cruise Control
ABS Single Channel Dual Channel
Body Type Cruiser Bikes Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Split Split
Pass Switch Yes Yes
Speedometer Digital Digital
Handle Type
Tachometer
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Charging point
Average Fuel economy
Digital Fuel Indicator
Distance to Empty
Low Fuel Warning Lamp Yes
External Fuel Filling
Clock
Stand Alarm
Low Battery Indicator
Stepup Seat
Low Oil Indicator
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
Passenger Backrest
Carry hook
Underseat storage
Cooling System Air Cooled Oil Cooled
Console Digital Digital
Anti Theft Alarm
Shutter Lock
Odometer Digital Digital
Central Locking
Navigation Yes
Mobile Connectivity
EBS
Service Due Indicator
Switchable ABS
DRLs
Keyless Ignition
Standard Warranty (Years)
Standard Warranty (kilometers)

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is better RTR 200 ABS or Fz25? What is mileage of both?
  • As a owner of rtr 200 4v i am telling you why i chose rtr 200 over fz 25 and then i will tell you why you should opt for fz 25 so let's start with rtr's pros over fz's1.Exhaust note: exhaust note of both the bikes are music to the ear of a rider but in my personal opinion I think RTR's exhaust note is likely superior to that of FZ's 20 exhaust note2. handling characteristics: handling of bobber bikes is so good but RTR's handlingis slightly superior to that of FZ's handling due to the sporty nature of the bike3. suitability: as a short rider I prefer RTR's riding dynamics more than FZS because RTR footpegs is slightly closer to the seat than that of FZS foot pegs so it becomes specially comfortable for short riders while FZ is neutral to the the all size of riders4 pricing: as you know that RTR is is slightly cheaper than FZ and it fulfills my needs also so I preferred RTR over FZnow the points in which which FZ is ahead of RTR1. there is no replacement for displacement: yes it is true because when you will write FZ it will surely feel that it is 250 cc bike and when you will ride RTR then it will give feel of 200 cc bike that exactly it is so if you need more torquey engine more usable power than FZ is quite ahead2: engine refinement: both the bikes are very refined with negligible vibrations but when you're considering specifically for the refinement of the engine then Yamaha is is slightly ahead of TVS and this improves the fuel economy of the FZ i own Apache so I know that its mileage is slightly less than that of every despite of having a smaller engine and slightly less power it gives less mileage so if you love mileage FZ25 should be your pick3: suitability: as I have mentioned earlier that RTR is specially made for shorter riders and it doesn't fits well with the medium-sized rider and the taller riders but it is not the case with the FZ which suits well with all sizes of riders so if you are a rider on taller side FZ should be your pick4. value for money: in spite of RTR being cheaper it is the FZ that is more value for money because it gets bigger engine better mileage and it gets Fi and abs together in that price which is not the case with the RTR rs people because it's a vs model doesn't have Fi so you can not call it value for moneyfinal verdict: both the bikes are very good you cannot go wrong with either of the bikes now it boils down to your personal preference and some subjective opinion that which bike looks more more pleasing to you and which brand is your favourite and the main point is here that what is your budget thanks
  • Both bikes come with 5 gears. engine capacity is different though. I haven’t ridden FZ25. But FZ25 doesn’t comes with ABS and from the safety point of view RTR ABS is good. But few issues with RTR is its stock headlamp doesn’t have enough power for night view, though high beam has enough to see. It comes with Carb only with ABS. Carb seems to feel outdated in this 21st century. On the pros side, it has beautiful weight distribution, the bike feel perfectly balanced to manoeuvre in city traffic, catches 100kmph so sweetly and runs butter smooth. I’ve done 130kmph in my RTR 200 ABS. Instrument cluster has whole lot of information. You don’t need to watch wrist watch or take out your smartphone when you’re late for the office and stucked in the traffic. Clutch feels light (my friend who has Avenger Street 220 said he has got the feel and meaning of Slipper Clutch after riding my machine). FZ25 has refined engine with EFI. But it has ordinary instrument cluster, doesn’t comes with ABS. Bottom line: I would suggest you to wait till 2019 April, you’ll get lot of options to choose from. You’ll get all bikes with ABS and FI will also come in many bikes. Or else EFI will make its way in all bikes from 2020 to comply the BS6 norms. 2019 May also marks the production of BS6 engines from many brands. And if you can’t wait to rev the engine then you should buy RTR ABS as safely is more important than the refinement of EFI (RE Classic 350 the best selling motorcycle of the country still comes CV Carburettor, this has helped me to get my set of wheels). Have a safe ride. Cheers!!!
  • The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is a comfortable city bike with plenty of grunt and agility for a quick race off the traffic lights and to tackle some twisties as well. But the engine feels too strained out on the highway. Also, ergonomically, with the high-set footpegs, it’s a tight spot for someone taller than 5 feet 10 inches. Even the brakes fail to inspire confidence under hard braking. Luckily though, TVS does offer ABS as an option. On the other hand, the Yamaha FZ25 is a good option for someone looking for a daily commuter. It’s a lot more welcoming for tall riders as well, when compared to the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V. Being a Yamaha, the FZ25 will prove to be reliable in the long run, looks smart and is a lot more frugal in the city. But the engine feels stressed at high speeds. Moreover, both the brakes and tyres don’t inspire confidence under hard braking either. We would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
View All Answers
Q. Which one is better between Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition and Pulsar 220 F?
  • The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is a comfortable city bike with plenty of grunt and agility for a quick race off the traffic lights and to tackle some twisties as well. But the engine feels too strained out on the highway. Also, ergonomically, with the high-set footpegs it’s a tight spot for someone taller than 5 feet 10 inches. Even the brakes fail to inspire confidence under hard braking. Luckily though, TVS does offer ABS as an option. But then, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 also gets ABS, a single-channel unit. Apart from that, the Bajaj is also a more well rounded motorcycle that does everything just right. The ride quality too is better on the Bajaj. So, if your daily riding consists more of city commutes, the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is the way to go. On the other hand, the Bajaj Pulsar 220F, despite its age, still remains a value for money motorcycle, given the performance and features it has on offer. The motor isn’t the most refined one out there, but will plaster a grin on your face with its grunt. All in all, it still remains an aspirational motorcycle for Indian buyers. We would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
  • Its Apache for race turned fuel injection system ...dual channel abs ...low beam head lamps on engine start..a glide through city option(please see it)reart tyre with more rubber..sn excellent display with connectivity ....but can you forget pulsar 220 f in which we saw clip on handle bars rear disc with race design nearly a decade ago...with 50000rs less ...
  • 4v is better then 220f if you still like 220f then purchase 2nd hand bz new version of 220f has so many manufacturer defects. go for 1yr old model
View All Answers
Q. Which one is better for balancing and racing? Apache 200 4v or pulsar NS 200? Please suggest.
  • Apaches I's tagged with racing...racing kit ..racing tuned engine ..display nice and futuristic big rear tyre ..you can change according to your needs..you can race it on a track...track kits are there.Please don't race on a road ...do balancing wearing safety kits.. and 200 is good but for this apache I'd the best..for racing....and balancing???
  • If you area hardcore driver who likes to drive hard and corner hard. I suggest you to go for pulsar NS 200. Apache 200 4v is also a great bike, but won't give you the required satisfaction
  • Ns 200 will be a better choice for touring as well as highway rides as its performance is very much better than its rival apache along with that ride quality is also very better...... But only issue is if you want a bike with fi technology then go for the apache 200 otherwise ns200 is best
View All Answers
View More Questions