Suzuki Gixxer SF vs TVS Apache 200 4V

TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Price starts at Rs. 1.28 Lakh which is Rs. 3,050 costlier than base model of Suzuki Gixxer SF priced at Rs. 1.24 Lakh. The claimed mileage . In technical specifications, Suzuki Gixxer SF is powered by 155 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is powered by 197.75 cc engine. Suzuki Gixxer SF is available in 4 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 200 4V comes with 4 colours. 53% users have chosen Suzuki Gixxer SF over TVS Apache RTR 200 4V in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.

Suzuki Gixxer SF vs TVS Apache 200 4V Comparison

Key Highlights Gixxer SF Apache RTR 200 4V
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.24 Lakh Rs. 1.28 Lakh
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 155 cc 197.75 cc
Power 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm Sport : 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm, Urban/ Rain : 17.32 PS @ 7800 rpm

Suzuki Gixxer SF vs TVS Apache 200 4V Summary

Specs Gixxer SF MotoGP BS6Apache RTR 200 4V Single-channel ABS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.24 Lakh View On Road Price Rs. 1.28 Lakh View On Road Price
(459 Ratings)
(1041 Ratings)
Engine Type 4-Stroke, 1-cylinder, Air cooled SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled
Max Power 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm Sport : 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm, Urban/ Rain : 17.32 PS @ 7800 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Insurance Rs. 9,140 Gixxer SF Insurance Rs. 9,191 Apache RTR 200 4V Insurance

Engine Type
4-Stroke, 1-cylinder, Air cooled
SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled
Engine Displacement
155 cc
197.75 cc
Max Power
13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm
Sport : 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm, Urban/ Rain : 17.32 PS @ 7800 rpm
Max Torque
13.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm
Sport : 17.25 Nm @ 7250 rpm, Urban/ Rain : 16.51 Nm @ 5750 rpm
Emission Type
56 mm
66 mm
62.9 mm
57.8 mm
No Of Cylinders
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
Fuel Type
Mapped ignition system
Compression Ratio

Brakes Front
Brakes Rear

Quarter Mile
18.72 secs @ 109.26 kmph
Braking (60-0 kmph)
17.60 mm
Braking (80-0 kmph)
32.04 mm
Braking (100-0 kmph)
55.22 mm
Mileage (City)
50.70 kmpl
Mileage (Highway)
42.58 kmpl
Braking 60-0 km/h
17.60 mm

Telescopic Forks
Double Cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame
Swing arm
Mono Tube - Mono Shock

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/60-17
Front :-90/90-17 Rear :-130/70-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Radial Tyre
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)

2025*715*1035 mm^3
2050*790*1050 mm^3
1340 mm
1353 mm
2025 mm
2050 mm
Ground Clearance
165 mm
180 mm
715 mm
790 mm
Fuel Capacity
12 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
148 Kg
151 Kg
Tail Light
Front Brake Diameter
270 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
240 mm

Battery Type
Maintenance Free
Pilot Lamps
LED tail lights
Turn Signal Lamp

Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Pass Switch
Trip Meter
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Air Cooled
Oil Cooled

Gixxer SF Alternatives

Apache RTR 200 4V Alternatives

Sell Your Car in Best Price

Instant money transfer, RC Transfer, Home Inspection

COVID safety assured - Contactless experience in whole process

News Updates on Gixxer SF and Apache RTR 200 4V

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Confused between Gixxer SF, Apache RTR 200 or Pulsar NS200. I am also a bit concerned about mileage.
  • I would select rtr200. The low crawl function of the bike is a great feature that one cannot miss. Usually highway runs for me would be very less as compared to city usage.
  • Apache 200 is good but daily use you should go Gixxer
  • R15
Q. Which is best for highway ride Gixxer 150 SF or Apache RTR 200 4V?
  • If you need mileage with speed so that conditions SF IS good because 90 to 95 speed sf milage 45 but 200 cc give 35 so you can think which one is better
  • Always faired bikes help you to cruise better in highway so gixxer sf
Q. Which is better RTR 200 ABS or Fz25? What is mileage of both?
  • As a owner of rtr 200 4v i am telling you why i chose rtr 200 over fz 25 and then i will tell you why you should opt for fz 25 so let's start with rtr's pros over fz's1.Exhaust note: exhaust note of both the bikes are music to the ear of a rider but in my personal opinion I think RTR's exhaust note is likely superior to that of FZ's 20 exhaust note2. handling characteristics: handling of bobber bikes is so good but RTR's handlingis slightly superior to that of FZ's handling due to the sporty nature of the bike3. suitability: as a short rider I prefer RTR's riding dynamics more than FZS because RTR footpegs is slightly closer to the seat than that of FZS foot pegs so it becomes specially comfortable for short riders while FZ is neutral to the the all size of riders4 pricing: as you know that RTR is is slightly cheaper than FZ and it fulfills my needs also so I preferred RTR over FZnow the points in which which FZ is ahead of RTR1. there is no replacement for displacement: yes it is true because when you will write FZ it will surely feel that it is 250 cc bike and when you will ride RTR then it will give feel of 200 cc bike that exactly it is so if you need more torquey engine more usable power than FZ is quite ahead2: engine refinement: both the bikes are very refined with negligible vibrations but when you're considering specifically for the refinement of the engine then Yamaha is is slightly ahead of TVS and this improves the fuel economy of the FZ i own Apache so I know that its mileage is slightly less than that of every despite of having a smaller engine and slightly less power it gives less mileage so if you love mileage FZ25 should be your pick3: suitability: as I have mentioned earlier that RTR is specially made for shorter riders and it doesn't fits well with the medium-sized rider and the taller riders but it is not the case with the FZ which suits well with all sizes of riders so if you are a rider on taller side FZ should be your pick4. value for money: in spite of RTR being cheaper it is the FZ that is more value for money because it gets bigger engine better mileage and it gets Fi and abs together in that price which is not the case with the RTR rs people because it's a vs model doesn't have Fi so you can not call it value for moneyfinal verdict: both the bikes are very good you cannot go wrong with either of the bikes now it boils down to your personal preference and some subjective opinion that which bike looks more more pleasing to you and which brand is your favourite and the main point is here that what is your budget thanks
  • Both bikes come with 5 gears. engine capacity is different though. I haven’t ridden FZ25. But FZ25 doesn’t comes with ABS and from the safety point of view RTR ABS is good. But few issues with RTR is its stock headlamp doesn’t have enough power for night view, though high beam has enough to see. It comes with Carb only with ABS. Carb seems to feel outdated in this 21st century. On the pros side, it has beautiful weight distribution, the bike feel perfectly balanced to manoeuvre in city traffic, catches 100kmph so sweetly and runs butter smooth. I’ve done 130kmph in my RTR 200 ABS. Instrument cluster has whole lot of information. You don’t need to watch wrist watch or take out your smartphone when you’re late for the office and stucked in the traffic. Clutch feels light (my friend who has Avenger Street 220 said he has got the feel and meaning of Slipper Clutch after riding my machine). FZ25 has refined engine with EFI. But it has ordinary instrument cluster, doesn’t comes with ABS. Bottom line: I would suggest you to wait till 2019 April, you’ll get lot of options to choose from. You’ll get all bikes with ABS and FI will also come in many bikes. Or else EFI will make its way in all bikes from 2020 to comply the BS6 norms. 2019 May also marks the production of BS6 engines from many brands. And if you can’t wait to rev the engine then you should buy RTR ABS as safely is more important than the refinement of EFI (RE Classic 350 the best selling motorcycle of the country still comes CV Carburettor, this has helped me to get my set of wheels). Have a safe ride. Cheers!!!
  • If you want better performance with comfort, go for apache. If you want looks and if you are a speed lover go with FZ.Apache plus points : Fully digital instrument cluster, exhaust sound, Riding posture, comfort, low maintenanceApache drawbacks : halogen headlight, chain noise, neutral gear indicator, tyre sizeFZ plus points : LED headlights, looks, power, broad tyres, instrument clusterFZ drawbacks : price, headlamp spread, relatively high maintenanceALL THE BEST !!! Keep Riding !!!
View All Answers
View More Questions

Popular Bikes Comparison

  • Trending
  • Scooters
  • Sports
  • Cruisers
Compare Bikes