×

Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs TVS Apache RR 310 Comparison

Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs TVS Apache RR 310

TVS Apache RR 310 Price starts at Rs. 2.28 lakh which is Rs. 57,345 costlier than Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 priced at Rs. 1.71 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is 38.5 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for TVS Apache RR 310 is 31 kmpl. In technical specifications, Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is powered by 249 cc engine where as TVS Apache RR 310 is powered by 312.2 cc engine. Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is available in 1 different colours while TVS Apache RR 310 comes with 1 colours. 64% users have chosen Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 over TVS Apache RR 310 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs TVS Apache RR 310 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

Engine Type 4-Stroke, 1-Cylinder, Oil-cooled Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, Reverse Inclined DOHC, SI Engine
Engine Displacement (CC) 249 cc 312.2 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 26.5 PS @ 9000 rpm 34 PS @ 9700 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm) 22.6 Nm @ 7500 rpm 27.3 Nm @ 7700 rpm
Bore 76 mm 80 mm
Stroke 54.9 mm 62.1 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 4 4
Fuel System
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Ignition Dynamically controlled integrated high energy ignition system
Compression Ratio 10.9:1
Engine Immobilizer
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 6 Speed 6 Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Braking Type
0-60 kmph (sec) 3.66s 2.93s
Quarter Mile 15.20 s @ 137.33 kmph
Braking (60-0 kmph) 21.64m 20.69m
20-80 kmph (kickdown)
30-70 kmph (3rd gear)
40-80 kmph (4th gear)
Braking (80-0 kmph) 38.16m 37.49m
Braking (100-0 kmph) 66.26m
Mileage (City) 37.5 kmpl 31 kmpl
Mileage (Highway) 40.95 kmpl 35.9 kmpl
Mileage (Overall) 35 kmpl
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl 38.5 kmpl
0-100 kmph (sec) 9.57s 7.17s
Top Speed (Km/h)
0-160 kmph
Braking 60-0 km/h 21.64m 20.69m
Chassis Type
Suspension-Front Telescopic, Coil Spring, Oil Damped Inverted Cartridge Telescopic Fork
Chassis Trellis frame, split chassis
Suspension-Rear Swingarm Type, Mono Suspension Two Arm Aluminium Die-Cast Swingarm, Mono Tube, Floating Piston Gas Assisted Shock Absorber
Tyre Size Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 Front :-110/70-R17 Rear :-150/60-R17
Wheel Size Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch Front :-17 inch Rear :-17 inch
Tyre Make
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Radial Tyre Yes Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) 32 psi
Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Dry Weight
Length*Width*Height 2010*740*1035 2001*786*1135
Wheelbase(mm) 1345 mm 1365 mm
Length 2010 mm 2001 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 165 mm 180 mm
Height 1035 mm 1135 mm
Seat Height 800 mm 810 mm
Width 740 mm 786 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 12 L 11 L
Kerb Weight
Total Weight
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 300 mm 300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 240 mm
Battery Type Maintenance Free Maintenance Free
Charging Time
Motor Type
Motor Power
Fast Charging
Battery
Range
Head Lamp
Projector head light
Pilot Lamps
LED tail lights
Seat Opening Switch
Boot Light
Turn Signal Lamp LED LED
Alternator
Power Modes
Cruise Control
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Body Type Sports Bikes Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Split Split
Pass Switch Yes Yes
Speedometer Digital Digital
Handle Type Two Piece Forged Handle Bar
Tachometer
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Charging point
Average Fuel economy
Digital Fuel Indicator
Distance to Empty
Low Fuel Warning Lamp Yes
External Fuel Filling
Clock Digital
Stand Alarm
Low Battery Indicator Yes
Stepup Seat
Low Oil Indicator
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights LED Projector
Passenger Backrest
Carry hook
Underseat storage
Cooling System Oil Cooled Liquid Cooled
Console Digital Digital
Anti Theft Alarm
Shutter Lock
Odometer Digital Digital
Central Locking
Navigation
Mobile Connectivity
EBS
Service Due Indicator
Switchable ABS
DRLs
Keyless Ignition
Standard Warranty (Years)
Standard Warranty (kilometers)

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which one is better in terms of mileage, performance, quality and comfortable between Suzuki Gixxer 250 and TVS Apache RR 310.
  • The prices of Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 and TVS Apache RR 310 starts from Rs. 1.71 lakhs and Rs. 2.27 lakh respectively. The claimed mileage for the Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is 30 km/l and for the TVS Apache RR 310 is 31 km/l. Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is powered by 249 cc Oil Cooled, Single-Cylinder, 4-Valve, SOHC engine which produces 26.5 PS @ 9000 rpm whereas TVS Apache RR 310 is powered by 312.2 cc Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, Reverse Inclined DOHC, SI engine which produces way better power of 34 PS @ 9700 rpm. The 800mm high rider’s seat of Suzuki Gixxer SF 250, allows even 5’6” riders to get their feet down flat. The split seats suggest sportiness, but its width and cushioning suggest adequate comfort for your companion. On the other hand, Apache RR 310 has a seat height of 810 mm which is 10 mm more than the Gixxer SF 250 but is comfortable enough. Also, TVS has also done a smart thing to ensure more comfortable city riding. For more comparison between these two, click on the link: https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/suzuki-gixxer-250-vs-tvs-akula-310
  • Both are equally good, but Apache 310 clock higher speeds but less economy. Apache focused on race track and SF 250 on touring
  • Gixxer
Q. Which is better between Dominar 400 and Apache RR 310
  • Here are the points to consider:1. comfortApache 3/5domi 4/52. looks Apache 5/5domi 4/53. overall handlingApache 4/5domi 3/54. value for money Apache 4/5domi 4/55. after sales cost:Apache 2/5domi 4/56. spares price:Apache 2/5domi 4/57. parts availability:apache 3/5domi 4/58. local mechanics availability (for minor issues like chain lock, gear lever, etc)Apache 3/5domi 4/5in the end, ride both motorcycles and decide.both are of different budget bikes, and both has different characteristics.If touring is priority,then dominar makes more sense, touring below 500 kms a day then Apache is also good. people have done ladakh on Apache too, depends on rider fitness and skills.I would choose Apache mainly for my riding style.
  • It's depend on you both bike performance are same but approx 60K price difference is there. Build quality of RR310 is better than Dominar 400. you can comfortably go on long tour with pillion in Dominar 400 but RR 310 is sports kind of bike so it is not suitable for pillion. if you are looking for good bike in decent price tag and comfortable for both rider and pillion then go for Dominar 400. if you are looking for sport kind of good looking bike and you don't care about price and pillion rider as well then go for RR310 choice is your.
  • Both are better in their own segment.One is a complete tourer and the other is a sports tourer.So the best tourer is Dominor and the best sports tourer is RR.According to your need, you can choose one. But if you are into the lifestyle and touring then I would prefer RR.Whenever I take RR on to road I will always find people staring at my bike.So the decision is yours.
View All Answers
Q. Which is better between KTM RC390 & APACHE RR 310?
  • Apache RR 310, despite being designed as a track focussed bike, is quite usable in the city thanks to its torquey and tractable motor. It offers a good balance between ride and handling as well. While brakes lack initial feel, they offer good bite. Another issue is vibrations around the 6000rpm range, which TVS has reduced to a fair degree. It is a good option to the focussed KTM RC 390, trading a bit of performance for everyday usability. KTM 390 Duke has always come across as a value for money product and the new variant takes the VFM quotient a notch up as it looks a lot more irresistible now. It gets an LED headlight unit and colour display that we like a lot and also handles beautifully with its aptly tuned suspension setup. Also, while it may not be as quick as the earlier 390, it certainly is a lot more refined. Between the TNT 300 and the KTM 390 Duke, the Benelli comes across as a motorcycle for people looking for a more relaxed way of commuting. The 390 Duke on the other hand is a wild beast and is meant for a lot more experienced riders and thrill seekers. Though, we would suggest you to take a test ride in order to pick one.
  • The Apache RR 310, despite being designed as a track focussed bike, is quite usable in the city thanks to its torquey and tractable motor. It offers a good balance between ride and handling as well. While brakes lack initial feel, they offer good bite. Another issue is vibrations around the 6000rpm range, which TVS has reduced to a fair degree. While the KTM RC 390 has a upper hand in terms of power and is priced higher than the Apache RR 310, it packs in a lot more punch packed with more tech and is also a pure track-focused machine. It has remained a go-to option for riders looking for a dedicated track tool owing to its ergonomics, suspension setup and handling characteristics. Moreover, we would suggest you take a test ride in order to check riding comfort. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://bit.ly/2jv2aXQ
  • KTM's RC 390 is definitely the best performer because both power and torque outputs of the RC are higher than the RR310. However, you would be in trouble if you buy an RC390 for daily commute or long rides. The heat dissipation system in the RC is too bad to handle in the regular daily city traffic and the RC 's committed riding posture and the fuel tank capacity are a big negative if you are buying one for long rides. Apache RR310 will be the best performer for regular city rides and long rides while the RC will be the top performer if you are a track rider.
View All Answers
View More Questions