Explore all New Cars of 2024
Suzuki Gixxer (2014-2018) vs Yamaha SZ-RR
Gixxer (2014-2018) vs SZ-RR
Key Highlights | Gixxer (2014-2018) STD | SZ-RR Version 2.0 |
---|---|---|
Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC | Air-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve |
Max Power | 14.8 PS @ 8000 rpm | 12.1 PS @ 7500 rpm |
Mileage (ARAI) | 64 Kmpl | 50 kmpl |
-
Gixxer (2014-2018) DISCONTINUED
Rs. 77,650SZ-RR DISCONTINUED
Rs. 69,983
Gixxer (2014-2018) vs SZ-RR Key Highlights
Basic Info | Gixxer (2014-2018) STD | SZ-RR Version 2.0 |
---|---|---|
Rating |
142 reviews
|
170 reviews
|
Brand Name | Suzuki | Yamaha |
Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 77,650 | Rs. 69,983 |
Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC | Air-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve |
Max Power | 14.8 PS @ 8000 rpm | 12.1 PS @ 7500 rpm |
Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
Colors | ||
Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
Brakes Rear | Drum | Drum |
Braking Type | ... | Unified Braking System |
Mileage (ARAI) | 64 Kmpl | 50 kmpl |
Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
ABS | no | no |
Starting | Kick and Self Start | Kick and Self Start |
Speedometer | Digital | Analogue |
Insurance | ... | ... |
Brochure | N/A | N/A |
Engine |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suspension |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warranty |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
Suzuki Gixxer (2014-2018)
- Great all-round package of looks
- handling and performance
Yamaha SZ-RR
- Styling
- Fuel Efficiency
Yamaha SZ-RR
- No pass switch
- Cost
Watch Videos of Gixxer (2014-2018) and SZ-RR
-
4 Aug, 201663046 views
-
7 Feb, 201696465 views
-
4 Feb, 201617164 views
-
10 Jun, 201554447 views
-
8 Oct, 201456244 views
Gixxer (2014-2018) and SZ-RR Competitors
-
Suzuki Gixxer
Rs. 1.34 Lakh
-
KTM 125 Duke
Rs. 1.79 Lakh
-
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V
Rs. 1.46 Lakh
-
Bajaj Pulsar 150
Rs. 1.10 Lakh
-
Bajaj Pulsar NS160
Rs. 1.45 Lakh
News Updates on Gixxer (2014-2018) and SZ-RR
-
Stand A Chance To Win Gold Coins On Any Suzuki Two-Wheeler14 Sep, 2018 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Yamaha SZ-RR Version 2.0 Discontinued26 Jul, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Suzuki Bandit 150 Showcased In Indonesia6 Aug, 2018 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Yamaha To Concentrate On Premium Motorcycles. End Of The Road For SZ-RR?19 Mar, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
-
2018 Suzuki Gixxer SP & SF SP Now Feature ABS As Standard9 Jul, 2018 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Yamaha SZ-RR Version 2.0 launched at Rs 65,30020 Oct, 2014 | By Team ZigWheels
-
JK Tyre National Racing Championship: Suzuki Gixxer Cup Round 1 Results9 Jul, 2018 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Suzuki Gixxer Gets Much Needed Safety Feature28 May, 2018 | By Team ZigWheels
Recently Asked User Questions
- Hi Himanshu, i understand your concern. Let me be straight forward. Safety is better than anything else. In today’s traffic and the way people ride. Its always better to have a bike with ABS enabled so that you don’t skid and fall at times of emergency braking.
- Single channel abs work only in front wheel and double channel abs work both the front and back wheels double channel abs is better than single channel abs.
- You have one life if you want to drive don't care about others . Take a test drive if you like go for it .
- Both bikes are almost same and the only difference is that is of the fairing. The SF is the sports version and other one is naked version.SF is a very good bike and if you really are into aerodynamics like bike will have to be very much stable at high speeds and stuff like that than SF is a worth buying option. I really like the way it feels,it's a combo of sports and crusier,which is better and now it comes with FI technology which makes it more agile. Hope it will help.
- Gixxer is the best bike in every field like- Mileage, Price Segment, Maintenance, Speed etc...Gixxer SF is good bike but I will not recommend you to buy that bike as it's price is more compared to gixxer, and it's mileage is also less compared to that. As well as, one of the demerits is the bigger front head which gives difficulties to ride if you are not an expert and bychance if that bigger head breaks than it would cost high to repair it....
- Gixxer is the naked version, SF version comes with fairings on either side which makes the bike more aerodynamic and is little faster than it's sibling. Otherwise everything is same.
- Pros and Cons of Gixxer as I own it.Engine performance is really good. Weight is less in comparison and thus it is light and nimble with good grip. Mileage which I get is 52 Kmpl and that includes both highway and city ride of 20 kms a day. Maintaining a bike is easy as it costs only 400 bucks per service except engine oil change. Gixxer is shorter hence benefits the driver of less height and it might be an issue for people with height 6 feet or more.This is it! My take will be Gixxer for city and Hornet for highway riding.It would be better if you take the test rides if available.
- Gixxer is better for riding and hornet for honda's reliability and smooth engine
- Gixxer not for daily base used
Gixxer (2014-2018) Vs SZ-RR Comparison FAQs
The Yamaha SZ-RR is cheaper than Suzuki Gixxer (2014-2018) by Rs. 7,667.
The Suzuki Gixxer (2014-2018) delivers better mileage 64 Kmpl.
For the STD version, 154.9 cc Petrol engine of Gixxer (2014-2018) produces 14.8 PS @ 8000 rpm of power and 14 Nm @ 6000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Version 2.0 version, 149 cc Petrol engine of SZ-RR produces 12.1 PS @ 7500 rpm of power and 12.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm of torque
User Reviews of Comparison
- Yamaha SZ-RR
-
Excellent bikeaccident bike accident bike accident bike accident bike accident bike accident bike accident bike accident bike Veri achcha bye meri taraf se bhari lay bhari lay bhari lay bhari excellent excellent excellent excellent excellent excellent excellent excellent excellent
King Pubg few weeks ago -
I love Yamaha bikes Because of its smooth engine and low maintenance good design.In My village many people purchased Yamaha bikes they used bike upto 1 Lakh Kilometers without no engine overhauling.
Chmn Thakur few weeks ago -
Yamaha SZRR Version 2.0 is an ultimate bike. no maintenance cost. good power and giving 55km milage in city traffic which cannot get it by any other 150cc bike. I have travelled from hyderabad to Visakhapatnam (700km) and hyderabad to Tirupathi (600km) by my bike. really a great pleasure on this commuting.
Brundavanam Ravikanth few weeks ago -
My bike is in very good condition and so much comfortable and puckup also good. I want to purchase new bike like R15 or pulsar NS200 Sports bike like that
JerrY Soni few weeks ago -
गजब बाइक good fells my bike is very good and i'm mantaing good ।।।all parts is perfact and my bike colour is good
Mani Bhardwaj few weeks ago
Images of Suzuki Gixxer (2014-2018),Yamaha SZ-RR
Popular Bikes Comparison
- Trending
- Scooters
- Sports
- Cruisers
- Commuters
-
Start a new comparison
-
Start a new comparison
-
Royal EnfieldInterceptor 650Rs. 3.03 LakhvsRoyal EnfieldContinental GT 650Rs. 3.19 Lakh
-
Royal EnfieldClassic 350Rs. 1.93 LakhvsRoyal EnfieldBullet 350Rs. 1.73 Lakh
-
Royal EnfieldClassic 350Rs. 1.93 LakhvsRoyal EnfieldMeteor 350Rs. 2.05 Lakh
-
Royal EnfieldClassic 350Rs. 1.93 LakhvsHondaHness CB350Rs. 2.09 Lakh
-
Royal EnfieldClassic 350Rs. 1.93 LakhvsRoyal EnfieldHunter 350Rs. 1.49 Lakh
-
Start a new comparison
-
Start a new comparison