Royal Enfield Himalayan vs TVS Apache RR 310 Comparison
Royal Enfield Himalayan vs TVS Apache RR 310
TVS Apache RR 310 Price starts at Rs. 2.28 lakh which is Rs. 47,049 costlier than Royal Enfield Himalayan priced at Rs. 1.81 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Royal Enfield Himalayan is 29.5 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for TVS Apache RR 310 is 31 kmpl. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Himalayan is powered by 411 cc engine where as TVS Apache RR 310 is powered by 312.2 cc engine. Royal Enfield Himalayan is available in 5 different colours while TVS Apache RR 310 comes with 1 colours. 51% users have chosen Royal Enfield Himalayan over TVS Apache RR 310 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Royal Enfield Himalayan vs TVS Apache RR 310 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Himalayan vs Apache RR 310 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Himalayan Sleet | Apache RR 310 ABS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.83 lakh | Rs. 2.28 lakh |
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Air cooled, SOHC | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, Reverse Inclined DOHC, SI Engine |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 411 cc | 312.2 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 24.83 PS @ 6500 rpm | 34 PS @ 9700 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 4.33s | 2.93s |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 29.48 kmpl | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-533.4 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Spoke | Alloy |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Analogue | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Air cooled, SOHC | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, Reverse Inclined DOHC, SI Engine |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 411 cc | 312.2 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 24.83 PS @ 6500 rpm | 34 PS @ 9700 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 32 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 27.3 Nm @ 7700 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| Bore | 78 mm | 80 mm |
| Stroke | 86 mm | 62.1 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Digital electronic ignition | Dynamically controlled integrated high energy ignition system |
| Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.9:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 6 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 4.33s | 2.93s |
| Quarter Mile | 17.92 s @ 114.66 kmph | 15.20 s @ 137.33 kmph |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 20.69m | |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 37.49m | |
| Mileage (City) | 36.26 kmpl | 31 kmpl |
| Mileage (Highway) | 37.8 kmpl | 35.9 kmpl |
| Mileage (Overall) | 35 kmpl | 35 kmpl |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 29.48 kmpl | |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 11.69s | 7.17s |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 20.69m |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic Forks | Inverted Cartridge Telescopic Fork |
| Chassis | Half-Duplex Split Cradle Frame | Trellis frame, split chassis |
| Suspension-Rear | Monoshock with Linkage | Two Arm Aluminium Die-Cast Swingarm, Mono Tube, Floating Piston Gas Assisted Shock Absorber |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/90-21 Rear :-120/90-17 | Front :-110/70-R17 Rear :-150/60-R17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-533.4 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tube | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | Yes |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Spoke | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 25 psi | 32 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2190*840*1360 | 2001*786*1135 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1465 mm | 1365 mm |
| Length | 2190 mm | 2001 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 220 mm | 180 mm |
| Height | 1360 mm | 1135 mm |
| Seat Height | 800 mm | 810 mm |
| Width | 840 mm | 786 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 15 L | 11 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 240 mm | 240 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | MF | Maintenance Free |
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | LED |
Features
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Tourer Bikes | Sports Bikes |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Analogue | Digital |
| Handle Type | Two Piece Forged Handle Bar | |
| Tachometer | Analogue | |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Average Fuel economy | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | Yes |
| Clock | Digital | |
| Low Battery Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | LED Projector | |
| Underseat storage | ||
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Analogue and Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | ||
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 10000 |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is better between KTM RC390 & APACHE RR 310?
- Apache RR 310, despite being designed as a track focussed bike, is quite usable in the city thanks to its torquey and tractable motor. It offers a good balance between ride and handling as well. While brakes lack initial feel, they offer good bite. Another issue is vibrations around the 6000rpm range, which TVS has reduced to a fair degree. It is a good option to the focussed KTM RC 390, trading a bit of performance for everyday usability. KTM 390 Duke has always come across as a value for money product and the new variant takes the VFM quotient a notch up as it looks a lot more irresistible now. It gets an LED headlight unit and colour display that we like a lot and also handles beautifully with its aptly tuned suspension setup. Also, while it may not be as quick as the earlier 390, it certainly is a lot more refined. Between the TNT 300 and the KTM 390 Duke, the Benelli comes across as a motorcycle for people looking for a more relaxed way of commuting. The 390 Duke on the other hand is a wild beast and is meant for a lot more experienced riders and thrill seekers. Though, we would suggest you to take a test ride in order to pick one.
- The Apache RR 310, despite being designed as a track focussed bike, is quite usable in the city thanks to its torquey and tractable motor. It offers a good balance between ride and handling as well. While brakes lack initial feel, they offer good bite. Another issue is vibrations around the 6000rpm range, which TVS has reduced to a fair degree. While the KTM RC 390 has a upper hand in terms of power and is priced higher than the Apache RR 310, it packs in a lot more punch packed with more tech and is also a pure track-focused machine. It has remained a go-to option for riders looking for a dedicated track tool owing to its ergonomics, suspension setup and handling characteristics. Moreover, we would suggest you take a test ride in order to check riding comfort. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://bit.ly/2jv2aXQ
- KTM's RC 390 is definitely the best performer because both power and torque outputs of the RC are higher than the RR310. However, you would be in trouble if you buy an RC390 for daily commute or long rides. The heat dissipation system in the RC is too bad to handle in the regular daily city traffic and the RC 's committed riding posture and the fuel tank capacity are a big negative if you are buying one for long rides. Apache RR310 will be the best performer for regular city rides and long rides while the RC will be the top performer if you are a track rider.
Q. Which is better between Dominar 400 and Apache RR 310
- RR310 is a premium category bike.It doesn't produce as much power as the Dominar, but it's a much linear delivery of power, so it won't be intimidating for a fairly new rider.It has very good styling, excellent road presence, considerably better after sales support.Maintenance wise it won't break your wallet either.On the other hand, Dominar is a much more VFM product.The new version now even comes with an engine that produces 40HP, 5HP more than the RR310.Dominar is no doubt the faster motorcycle of the two and sounds better as well.And in my personal opinion, Dominar is a much more usable bike interms of daily commute due to its seating posture and a refined engine.So, if you're looking for a bike for mostly touring and occasional city rides with best possible reliability go for RR310. For anything and everything else go with Dominar, you definitely won't be disappointed. Good Luck !
- Here are the points to consider:1. comfortApache 3/5domi 4/52. looks Apache 5/5domi 4/53. overall handlingApache 4/5domi 3/54. value for money Apache 4/5domi 4/55. after sales cost:Apache 2/5domi 4/56. spares price:Apache 2/5domi 4/57. parts availability:apache 3/5domi 4/58. local mechanics availability (for minor issues like chain lock, gear lever, etc)Apache 3/5domi 4/5in the end, ride both motorcycles and decide.both are of different budget bikes, and both has different characteristics.If touring is priority,then dominar makes more sense, touring below 500 kms a day then Apache is also good. people have done ladakh on Apache too, depends on rider fitness and skills.I would choose Apache mainly for my riding style.
- It's depend on you both bike performance are same but approx 60K price difference is there. Build quality of RR310 is better than Dominar 400. you can comfortably go on long tour with pillion in Dominar 400 but RR 310 is sports kind of bike so it is not suitable for pillion. if you are looking for good bike in decent price tag and comfortable for both rider and pillion then go for Dominar 400. if you are looking for sport kind of good looking bike and you don't care about price and pillion rider as well then go for RR310 choice is your.
Q. Ktm 390 or tvs 310 which is best to buy - Apache RR 310?
- Rr 310 bro,it's faster than duke 390,doesn't heats up,is good for commuting touring and occasional track days,also the ground clearance is 180mm which means it can handle bad roads(off roading) as well. Also it costs less than duke 390,money wil be saved.Also tvs is a indian brand so service network is available all over India, High speed stability is also good on Rr 310.Make a good decision and buy Rr 310. All the best. Ride Safe.😁
- Chutiye kisne bola tujhe ki rr310 duke 390 se fast hai, ek baar google kr liya kr gyaan chodne se pehle, duke 390 apne segment ki sbse fast bike hai, even dominar is faster than your garibon ki panigale
- Are you sure RR310 faster than Duke 390?even Ninja 400 can't beat duke 390 in drag race, but in top end Ninja beaths duke 390.& then there's you who is saying rr310 faster than Duke 390..LOLXD
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
