Revolt RV400 vs Yamaha FZS V3 Comparison

Revolt RV400 vs Yamaha FZS V3

Revolt RV400 Price starts at Rs. 98,999 which is Rs. 319 costlier than Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 priced at Rs. 98,680. The claimed mileage for the Revolt RV400 is NA where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 is 50 kmpl. In technical specifications, Revolt RV400 is powered by engine where as Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 is powered by 149 cc engine. Revolt RV400 is available in 1 different colours while Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 comes with 1 colours. 72% users have chosen Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 over Revolt Motors RV400 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Revolt RV400 vs Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

Engine Type Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Engine Displacement (CC) 149 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm)
Bore 57.3 mm
Stroke 57.9 mm
No Of Cylinders 1
Drive Type Belt Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 2
Fuel System
Fuel Type Electric Petrol
Ignition Transistor controlled ignition
Compression Ratio 9.5:1
Engine Immobilizer
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
No Of Gears 5 Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Braking Type Combi Brake System
0-60 kmph (sec) 5.97s
Quarter Mile 20.35 sec @ 100.37 kmph
Braking (60-0 kmph) 20.48 mm
20-80 kmph (kickdown)
30-70 kmph (3rd gear)
40-80 kmph (4th gear)
Braking (80-0 kmph) 36.44 mm
Braking (100-0 kmph)
Mileage (City) 49.31 kmpl
Mileage (Highway) 55.42 kmpl
Mileage (Overall)
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl 50 kmpl
0-100 kmph (sec) 20.10s
Top Speed (Km/h)
0-160 kmph
Braking 60-0 km/h 20.48 mm
Chassis Type
Suspension-Front Upside Down Forks Telescopic
Chassis Lightweight Single cradle Frame Diamond
Suspension-Rear Monoshock Swingram
Tyre Size Front 90/80-17, Rear 120/80-17 Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/60-R17
Wheel Size Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch Front :-17 inch Rear :-17 inch
Tyre Make
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Radial Tyre Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) 28 psi
Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Dry Weight
Length*Width*Height 1990*780*1080
Wheelbase(mm) 1350 mm 1330 mm
Length 1990 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 215 mm 165 mm
Height 1080 mm
Seat Height 814 mm 790 mm
Width 780 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 12.8 L
Kerb Weight
Total Weight
Tail Light LED Bulb
Front Brake Diameter 240 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 240 mm
Battery Type Lithium-Ion Maintenance Free
Charging Time 3 - 4.5 Hours
Motor Type
Motor Power 3000 W
Fast Charging Yes
Range 150 km/charge
Head Lamp
Projector head light
Pilot Lamps
LED tail lights
Seat Opening Switch
Boot Light
Turn Signal Lamp LED Bulb
Power Modes
Cruise Control
ABS no Single Channel
Body Type Electric Bikes Sports Naked Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Split Single
Pass Switch Yes Yes
Speedometer Digital Digital
Handle Type
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Charging point Yes
Average Fuel economy
Digital Fuel Indicator
Distance to Empty
Low Fuel Warning Lamp Yes
External Fuel Filling
Clock Digital
Stand Alarm
Low Battery Indicator Yes
Stepup Seat
Low Oil Indicator Yes
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
Passenger Backrest
Carry hook
Underseat storage
Cooling System Air Cooled
Console Digital Digital
Anti Theft Alarm
Shutter Lock
Odometer Digital Digital
Central Locking
Navigation Yes
Mobile Connectivity
Service Due Indicator
Switchable ABS
DRLs Yes
Keyless Ignition
Standard Warranty (Years) 2
Standard Warranty (kilometers) 30000

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is best Apache RTR 160 4V or fZ S FI V3?
  • For TVS Apache 160 4V>> Yes it is true that disc brake is making sound and even when i contacted the service center for sound issue they told me that it can not be completely removed because the sound is caused by the dust between brake pads and brake discs, so minor brake sound in normal even i haven't seen any bike which do not have brake noise.>> In lighting matter i do not found any issue in that , in spite i found its lighting more sporty than any bike of this 160cc segment.>>Exchust sound choice is also not that creepy,however for that you should take test ride check it byh your self.
  • Bro performance ofcourse yamaha and for racer type rider apache but it have many problems 😰 buy yamaha kam se kam itni problem toh dekhni nhi pdegi. buy default apache k carb m or engine k beech ek rubber m problem hai sbhi bike m toh 2018 model m woh change kr rhe hain. One way clutch ki bhi bohot problem hai. jab apki bike new hogi toh sound mast lgega but after some months engine ki taraf se sound tejj ho jayega jiska ilaaz h hi nhi. Gear problem also. And the most problem I'm having that ki iske har month Tapits m dikkat aa rhi hai.
  • If you want more power than obviously Apache RTR 160 4V will be the good choice or if anyone want comfortable Ride Refined Engine better mileage and bigger look than yamaha Fzs v3 will be a good choice
View All Answers
Q. Which is best between FZ S V3 and Pulsar 150?
  • Both the bikes are good on their own segments Bajaj Pulsar 150 is sports bike whereas FZ S V3 is a naked racer. To know more about this we suggest you take a test ride of the vehicles and that will help you to decide the comfort and ergonomics of the vehicle better. Click the below link to see the difference between two motorcycles. Pulsar 150 Neon vs FZ Fi Version 3.0 STD vs Comparison: https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/bajaj-pulsar-150-neon-vs-yamaha-fz-fi-version-30-std
  • Pulsar 150 milage is not so good and it's not a sports bike it's pick up is also not goodFz is awesome according to it's performance pick up mileage is is perfect
  • Fzs v3 is better. Because on the view of the roadgrip,breaking, mileage, smooth sound, importantly it look like standard bike
View All Answers
Q. Which is better between Honda Hornet and FZS V3
  • Definitely the FZS v3 should be your pick over the cb hornet since honda still offers it with an carburetor engine over the fuel injection on offer with the FZ. All otherofferings with tyre, design, frame are all oneat the same over which the hornet gets CBSon offer. Anyhow the newly launched FZS v3 should your pick over the year old facelift hornet received to get recognized on theroad. Mileage wise again the smooth fuelinjected tci engine on the FZS offers a littlemore than the cdi carbureted engine on thehornet, but the results could be neglected(maybe differs by 2-3 km).My suggestionwould be the YAMAHA FZS.
  • If we talk about Hornet, its motor is the most powerful here though not the most refined. The handling too lags behind its rivals in terms of agility. What it gets are good reliability and brilliant fit and finish levels but that comes at a price too. It is the most expensive motorcycle in its segment. So, if you require better power performance, you may go for Hornet. On the other and Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 would be a better pick if you are looking for a fresh design and looks with better handling. Click on the link to compare both bikes: https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/honda-cb-hornet-160r-vs-yamaha-fz-s-fi-version-30
  • Hornet looks muscular and has a beautiful tail light but it has a plastic feel and look to it and its mono shock has a quite after market appeal to it. Fit and finish is not good when observed closely. Yamaha has a superb balancing and good fit and finish. its engine is very much refined as well.
View All Answers
View More Questions