×

KTM RC 200 vs Yamaha MT 15

KTM RC 200 Price starts at Rs. 2.04 Lakh which is Rs. 64,196 costlier than base model of Yamaha MT 15 priced at Rs. 1.39 Lakh. The claimed mileage . In technical specifications, KTM RC 200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine , while Yamaha MT 15 is powered by 155 cc engine. KTM RC 200 is available in 1 different colours while Yamaha MT 15 comes with 3 colours. 58% users have chosen Yamaha MT-15 over KTM RC 200 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.

KTM RC 200 vs Yamaha MT 15 Comparison

Key Highlights RC 200 MT-15
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 2.04 Lakh Rs. 1.39 Lakh
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 199.5 cc 155 cc
Power 25 PS @ 10000 rpm 18.5 PS @ 10000 rpm

KTM RC 200 vs Yamaha MT 15 Summary

Specs RC 200 BS6MT-15 Dark Matte Blue
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 2.04 Lakh View On Road Price Rs. 1.39 Lakh View On Road Price
Rating
4.1
(1013 Ratings)
4.3
(534 Ratings)
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 25 PS @ 10000 rpm 18.5 PS @ 10000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Insurance Rs. 10,470 RC 200 Insurance Rs. 10,101 MT-15 Insurance

Engine Type
Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC
Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Engine Displacement
199.5 cc
155 cc
Max Power
25 PS @ 10000 rpm
18.5 PS @ 10000 rpm
Max Torque
19.2 Nm @ 8000 rpm
13.9 Nm @ 8500 rpm
Emission Type
bs6
bs6
Bore
72 mm
58 mm
Stroke
49 mm
58.7 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
4
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment
Transistor controlled ignition
Compression Ratio
14.5:1
11.6:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc

Suspension-Front
WP-USD Ø 43 mm
Telescopic fork
Chassis
Steel Trellis Frame
Deltabox
Suspension-Rear
WP Monoshock
Linked-type Monocross suspension

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70 - 17, Rear :-150/60 - 17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Dry Weight
154.3 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
1978*688*1098 mm^3
2020*800*1070 mm^3
Wheelbase
1340 mm
1335 mm
Length
1978 mm
2020 mm
Ground Clearance
178.5 mm
170 mm
Width
688 mm
800 mm
Fuel Capacity
9.5 Liters
10 Liters
Kerb Weight
...
138 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
282 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
230 mm
220 mm

LED tail lights
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
LED

ABS
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Single
Pass Switch
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Average Fuel economy
...
Distance to Empty
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Stepup Seat
...
Low Oil Indicator
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
...
Passenger Backrest
...
Underseat storage
...
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Console
Digital
Digital
Odometer
Digital
Digital

RC 200 Alternatives

MT-15 Alternatives

Gaad-Store
Sell Your Car in Best Price

Instant money transfer, RC Transfer, Home Inspection

COVID safety assured - Contactless experience in whole process

News Updates on RC 200 and MT-15

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which one is better R15 v3 or KTM RC 200?
  • Both are best in there own ways.For RC 200:1)Engine is much better than R15 V3 2) Initial power is more3)Fuel Efficiency:35-45 km/L4) Maintenance cost is more comparing to V35)Top speed:138Km/H6)No vibration at all7) Excellent brightness for the both Dim & Highbeam For R15 V3:1) Fuel Efficiency:45-502) Maintenance cost is less3) Initial power is less comparing to Rc2004)Top speed: 160Km/H 5)Low brightness for the headlights
  • RC 200 much better option than R15 V3 but only if you budget permits it provides an adjustable suspension with the very other body that can do well on track as well as on normal roads but if you are running short on budget then go for an 583 has optimum performance with in its budget.
  • I have been a KTM rider past 3 years with my RC 200, experience has been good , talking about RC and R15 v3 first of all Power comes in Picture RC is 25bhp where as R15 is 19 Bhp, both bike have super sporty riding position,so comfort wise both bikes are not great ,the Yamaha R15 v3 handle bar is more lower then that of RC , if you want to upgrade to higher cc bike later then would suggest ktm rc as you will get use to Power later on which is important for when u go for higher cc bike
View All Answers
Q. Which one is better MT15 or NS200? And what is the mileage of NS200?
  • Among the two, we would suggest you to go with the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 if you are looking for a affordable sporty streetfighter. The bike employs a 199.5cc single-cylinder liquid-cooled fuel-injected engine. It churns out 24.5PS at 9750rpm and 18.5Nm at 8000rpm. The NS200 offers sporty handling, a smooth 6-speed gearbox and brilliant performance at an affordable price point. On the other hand, if you want better mileage, a versatile 155cc engine, compact design and attractive styling, then the Yamaha MT 15 would be a better option. However, the compact riding posture might be a bit too tight for large riders. What is also disheartening is the poor switchgear and build quality as well as the lack of dual-channel ABS. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read More: - Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Yamaha MT 15
Q. Which is better among Yamaha MT 15 and Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Selecting between the Yamaha MT 15 and Honda Hornet would depend on certain factors such as budget, preference of the segment, features required, preference of the performance and usage of the bike. If you are looking for a 180cc bike with linear power delivery, healthy mid-range torque, comfortable riding position and a refined engine, the Honda Hornet 2.0 would be a better option. On the other hand, if you are powerful 155cc bike with outright performance, compact design, great agility and brilliant looks then you may opt for the Yamaha MT 15. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of comfort and compatibility. You may click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read More: - Yamaha MT-15 Road Test Review - Do The Hornet 2.0’s Rivals Have What It Takes To Stir Its Nest?
  • Hornet 2.0
View More Questions

Popular Bikes Comparison

  • Trending
  • Scooters
  • Sports
  • Cruisers
Compare Bikes