×

KTM RC 200 vs TVS Apache RR 310 Comparison

KTM RC 200 vs TVS Apache RR 310

TVS Apache RR 310 Price starts at Rs. 2.40 lakh which is Rs. 43,232 costlier than KTM RC 200 priced at Rs. 1.97 lakh. The claimed mileage for the KTM RC 200 is NA where as the claimed mileage for TVS Apache RR 310 is 31 kmpl....read more

RC 200 vs Apache RR 310 vs 390 Duke Specs Overview

Specs/Features RC 200 BS6Apache RR 310 ABS390 Duke BS6
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.97 lakhView On Road Price Rs. 2.40 lakhView On Road Price Rs. 2.53 lakhView On Road Price
Rating
4.2
(506 Ratings)
4.2
(295 Ratings)
4.2
(444 Ratings)
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, Reverse Inclined DOHC, SI Engine Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 199.5 cc 312.2 cc 373.2 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 25 PS @ 10000 rpm 34 PS @ 9700 rpm 43.5 PS @ 9000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol Petrol
Transmission Type Manual Manual Manual
Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc Disc
0-60 kmph (sec) ... 2.93s ...
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital Digital
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, Reverse Inclined DOHC, SI Engine Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 199.5 cc 312.2 cc 373.2 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 25 PS @ 10000 rpm 34 PS @ 9700 rpm 43.5 PS @ 9000 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm) 19.2 Nm @ 8000 rpm 27.3 Nm @ 7700 rpm 37 Nm @ 7000 rpm
Emission Type bs6 bs4 bs6
Bore 72 mm 80 mm 89 mm
Stroke 49 mm 62.1 mm 60 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 4 4 4
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol Petrol
Ignition Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment Dynamically controlled integrated high energy ignition system Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment
Compression Ratio 14.5:1 10.9:1 ...
Transmission Type Manual Manual Manual
No Of Gears 6 Speed 6 Speed 6 Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc Disc
0-60 kmph (sec) ... 2.93s ...
Quarter Mile ... 15.20 s @ 137.33 kmph ...
Braking (60-0 kmph) ... 20.69m ...
Braking (80-0 kmph) ... 37.49m ...
Mileage (City) ... 31 kmpl ...
Mileage (Highway) ... 35.9 kmpl ...
Mileage (Overall) ... 35 kmpl ...
0-100 kmph (sec) ... 7.17s ...
Braking 60-0 km/h ... 20.69m ...
Suspension-Front WP-USD Ø 43 mm Inverted Cartridge Telescopic Fork WP-Open Cartridge USD Ø 43 mm
Chassis Steel Trellis Frame Trellis frame, split chassis Split Steel Trellis Frame
Suspension-Rear WP Monoshock Two Arm Aluminium Die-Cast Swingarm, Mono Tube, Floating Piston Gas Assisted Shock Absorber WP-Monoshock
Tyre Size Front :-110/70 - 17, Rear :-150/60 - 17 Front :-110/70-R17 Rear :-150/60-R17 Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless Tubeless
Radial Tyre ...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) ... 32 psi ...
Dry Weight 154.3 kg ... 163 kg
Length*Width*Height 1978*688*1098 2001*786*1135 ...
Wheelbase(mm) 1340 mm 1365 mm 1357
Length 1978 mm 2001 mm ...
Ground Clearance (mm) 178.5 mm 180 mm 185 mm
Height 1098 mm 1135 mm ...
Seat Height 835 mm 810 mm 830 mm
Width 688 mm 786 mm ...
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 9.5 L 11 L 13.5 L
Tail Light LED LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 300 mm 300 mm 320 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 230 mm 240 mm 230 mm
Battery Type ... Maintenance Free ...
Pilot Lamps ... ...
LED tail lights
Turn Signal Lamp LED LED LED
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel Dual Channel
Body Type Sports Bikes Sports Bikes Sports Naked Bikes
Body Graphics ...
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Split Split Split
Pass Switch
Speedometer Digital Digital Digital
Handle Type ... Two Piece Forged Handle Bar ...
Trip Meter Digital Digital Digital
Average Fuel economy ... ...
Distance to Empty ... ...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock Digital Digital
Low Battery Indicator
Stepup Seat ...
Low Oil Indicator ... ...
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights LED Projector ...
Underseat storage ... ...
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid Cooled Liquid Cooled
Console Digital Digital Digital
Odometer Digital Digital Digital

News Updates on RC 200 and Apache RR 310

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which one is better R15 v3 or KTM RC 200?
  • We rode the new R15 v3.0 on both the racetrack and in the real world. While the R15 has grown larger and more powerful, it needs a certain level of expertise to tame. The more committed ergonomics make for an uncomfortable ride in the city. If you are looking for a dynamically competent bike that you’d like to hone your riding skills on and don't mind the committed riding position, the Yamaha R15 v 3.0 is the one to go for. It's a bike we'd love to have in our garage but its ergonomics limit its practicality. That's the reason it can not be our primary everyday bike. On the other hand, the RC 200 has set the bar quite high for the entry-level sports bike segment. The committed ergonomics might not be everyone’s cup of tea but if you are looking for cornering dynamics with an added dose of power but are on a budget, your search ends here.Read More: - 2017 KTM RC 200: First Ride Review In Images: https://www.zigwheels.com/gallery/bikesslideshow/2017-ktm-rc-200-first-ride-review-in-images/27324/1/1 - Yamaha R15 v3.0 Road Test Review: https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/yamaha-r15-v30-road-test-review/30566/
  • Both are best in there own ways.For RC 200:1)Engine is much better than R15 V3 2) Initial power is more3)Fuel Efficiency:35-45 km/L4) Maintenance cost is more comparing to V35)Top speed:138Km/H6)No vibration at all7) Excellent brightness for the both Dim & Highbeam For R15 V3:1) Fuel Efficiency:45-502) Maintenance cost is less3) Initial power is less comparing to Rc2004)Top speed: 160Km/H 5)Low brightness for the headlights
  • RC 200 much better option than R15 V3 but only if you budget permits it provides an adjustable suspension with the very other body that can do well on track as well as on normal roads but if you are running short on budget then go for an 583 has optimum performance with in its budget.
View All Answers
Q. Between KTM RC 125 and KTM RC 200, which one is good and affordable for a middle class family?
  • The KTM RC 125 is priced at Rs. 1.47 lakh (ex-showroom, Delhi) whereas, KTM RC 200 is priced at Rs. 1.91 lakh (ex-showroom, Delhi). At this price point, KTM RC 125 seems a tad expensive and does not justify the pricing, on the other hand, RC 200 offers a good list of features & cycle parts and best performance in the segment and the asking price is also justifiable. Thus, going with the RC 200 would be a better option if you are looking for a value-for-money offering. In order to know which bike would be a more suitable companion, we'd recommend taking a test ride. Please click on the following link and select your city accordingly for the dealership details - KTM Bike Showrooms Read more: - KTM RC 125 vs KTM RC 200 Comparison
  • Hi I wanted to know if I buy from you to bring to Bangladesh what should I do if possible
  • KTM RC 125
Q. Which is best bike KTM RC 200 or KTM RC 390?
  • It's totally upto your decision. If you are someone who travels a lot then rc would be a very bad decision. Trust me you will surely feel riding a cycle to be less stressful. The power is insane and scary and looks awesome. But don't get deceived by its looks alone. The bike stands out in the crowd but you surely will lose the interest in riding that bike for more than 3-4months. Dukes are the best choice. Wait for the next duke to release. Tons of improvement. Duke 390 has the best console which the rc does not have. So it's any a better choice
  • Depends whether you want more power or bit pocket friendly bike....390 will initially cost you 70k approx more than RC 200. But you will get insane power, which if you are able to handle. For features RC 200 is also going to get abs sooner so that won't be an advantage with RC 390. Coming to more looked factor the mileage...for 390 you will achieve an average of 20-23 kmpl while for RC 200 you can get 32-35 kmpl. Keeping these factors you can decide yourself. Ride safe
  • Ktm 390 is best because it's has more features compare to 200 but 390 is good in highway not in economy mode..its will suffer...ktm 200rc will manage economic mode and beast mode..its suitable for both
View All Answers
View More Questions