×

KTM RC 200 vs Royal Enfield Himalayan Comparison

KTM RC 200 vs Royal Enfield Himalayan

KTM RC 200 Price starts at Rs. 1.91 lakh which is Rs. 9,679 costlier than Royal Enfield Himalayan priced at Rs. 1.81 lakh. The claimed mileage for the KTM RC 200 is 32 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Royal Enfield Himalayan is 29.5 kmpl. In technical specifications, KTM RC 200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine where as Royal Enfield Himalayan is powered by 411 cc engine. KTM RC 200 is available in 2 different colours while Royal Enfield Himalayan comes with 5 colours. 65% users have chosen Royal Enfield Himalayan over KTM RC 200 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare KTM RC 200 vs Royal Enfield Himalayan on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

Engine Type 1-Cylinder, 4-Stroke, DOHC Engine Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Air cooled, SOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 199.5 cc 411 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 25.83 PS @ 10000 rpm 24.83 PS @ 6500 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm)
Bore 72 mm 78 mm
Stroke 49 mm 86 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 4
Fuel System
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Ignition Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment Digital electronic ignition
Compression Ratio 14.5:1 9.5:1
Engine Immobilizer
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 6 Speed 5 Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Braking Type
0-60 kmph (sec) 4.33s
Quarter Mile 17.92 s @ 114.66 kmph
Braking (60-0 kmph) 20.74 m
20-80 kmph (kickdown)
30-70 kmph (3rd gear)
40-80 kmph (4th gear)
Braking (80-0 kmph) 36.14 m
Braking (100-0 kmph) 56.21 m
Mileage (City) 36.26 kmpl
Mileage (Highway) 37.8 kmpl
Mileage (Overall) 32 kmpl 35 kmpl
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl 29.48 kmpl
0-100 kmph (sec) 11.69s
Top Speed (Km/h)
0-160 kmph
Braking 60-0 km/h 20.74 m
Chassis Type
Suspension-Front WP Upside-Down Fork Ø 43 mm Telescopic Forks
Chassis Steel Trellis Frame, Powder Coated Half-Duplex Split Cradle Frame
Suspension-Rear WP Monoshock Monoshock with Linkage
Tyre Size Front :-110/70 - 17, Rear :-150/60 - 17 Front :-90/90-21 Rear :-120/90-17
Wheel Size Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch Front :-21 inch Rear :-17 inch
Tyre Make
Tyre Type Tubeless Tube
Radial Tyre Yes Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) 29 psi 28 psi
Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Dry Weight 153 kg
Length*Width*Height 1978*688*1098 2190*840*1360
Wheelbase(mm) 1340 mm 1465 mm
Length 1978 mm 2190 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 178.5 mm 220 mm
Height 1098 mm 1360 mm
Seat Height 835 mm 800 mm
Width 688 mm 840 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 9.5 L 15 L
Kerb Weight
Total Weight
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 300 mm 300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 230 mm 240 mm
Battery Type Maintenance Free MF
Charging Time
Motor Type
Motor Power
Fast Charging
Battery
Range
Head Lamp
Projector head light
Pilot Lamps
LED tail lights
Seat Opening Switch
Boot Light
Turn Signal Lamp LED Bulb
Alternator
Power Modes
Cruise Control
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Body Type Sports Bikes Tourer Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Split Single
Pass Switch Yes Yes
Speedometer Digital Analogue
Handle Type
Tachometer Analogue
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Charging point
Average Fuel economy
Digital Fuel Indicator
Distance to Empty
Low Fuel Warning Lamp Yes Yes
External Fuel Filling
Clock
Stand Alarm
Low Battery Indicator Yes
Stepup Seat
Low Oil Indicator Yes
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
Passenger Backrest
Carry hook
Underseat storage
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Air Cooled
Console Digital Analogue and Digital
Anti Theft Alarm
Shutter Lock
Odometer Digital Digital
Central Locking
Navigation
Mobile Connectivity No
EBS
Service Due Indicator
Switchable ABS
DRLs
Keyless Ignition
Standard Warranty (Years) 2
Standard Warranty (kilometers) 30000 10000

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is the best 200cc bike - RC 200?
  • Yes if you love doing corners
Q. Himalayan or Classic 350, which has the best pillion comfortable seat?
  • Both bikes have really good rider and pilloin comfort . HIMALAYAN's seat is a bit higher then classic 350 seat . Pillion can feel a little trouble while taking his position but during Ride the soft seat material helps a lot for both rider and pilloin . Classic 350 seat is quite wider than Himalayan also a little more comfortable . So in my opinion , both bikes have rea good comfort level but if I have to choose between classic and Himalayan than I'll go with classic 350 . Just a little bit of difference, not too much .
  • No doubt the Himalayan. The pillion sits higher and the pegs are not rear set. The gel seat helps too.
  • Himalayan is more than comfort between the 350
View All Answers
View More Questions View More Questions