KTM RC 200 vs KTM RC 390 Comparison
KTM RC 200 vs KTM RC 390
KTM RC 390 Price starts at Rs. 2.48 lakh which is Rs. 51,307 costlier than KTM RC 200 priced at Rs. 1.97 lakh. The claimed mileage for the KTM RC 200 is NA where as the claimed mileage for KTM RC 390 is NA. In technical specifications, KTM RC 200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine where as KTM RC 390 is powered by 373.3 cc engine. KTM RC 200 is available in 2 different colours while KTM RC 390 comes with 2 colours. 54% users have chosen KTM RC 390 over KTM RC 200 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare KTM RC 200 vs KTM RC 390 on the basis of price, specifications & other features....read more
RC 200 vs RC 390 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | RC 200 BS6 | RC 390 BS6 |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.97 lakhView On Road Price | Rs. 2.48 lakhView On Road Price |
| Rating | 4.2 (503 Ratings) |
4.2 (332 Ratings) |
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 373.3 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 25 PS @ 10000 rpm | 43.5 PS @ 9000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Colors | ||
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 373.3 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 25 PS @ 10000 rpm | 43.5 PS @ 9000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 19.2 Nm @ 8000 rpm | 36 Nm @ 7000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs6 | bs6 |
| Bore | 72 mm | 89 mm |
| Stroke | 49 mm | 60 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment | ... |
| Compression Ratio | 14.5:1 | 14.5:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 6 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | WP-USD Ø 43 mm | WP-Open Cartridge USD Ø 43 mm |
| Chassis | Steel Trellis Frame | Steel Trellis Frame |
| Suspension-Rear | WP Monoshock | WP-Monoshock |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-110/70 - 17, Rear :-150/60 - 17 | Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | 154.3 kg | 166.8 kg |
| Length*Width*Height | 1978*688*1098 | 2145*760*830 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1340 mm | 1340 mm |
| Length | 1978 mm | 2145 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 178.5 mm | 178.5 mm |
| Height | 1098 mm | 830 mm |
| Seat Height | 835 mm | 820 mm |
| Width | 688 mm | 760 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 9.5 L | 9.5 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 300 mm | 320 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 230 mm |
Electricals
| Pilot Lamps | ... | |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | LED |
Features
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Bikes | Sports Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Handle Type | ... | Clip On |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Average Fuel economy | ||
| Distance to Empty | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | ||
| Stepup Seat | ... | |
| Low Oil Indicator | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ||
| Underseat storage | ... | |
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
News Updates on RC 200 and RC 390
-
KTM RC 200: Same Price, Other OptionsWe list other two-wheelers you can buy for the price of a KTM RC 200
Jul 31, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
Here’s what the KTM RC 390 will look like
The next generation RC 390 will have a completely different, larger bodywork
Dec 21, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
Finally! KTM RC200 Gets Single-channel ABS
Apart from the 250 Duke, KTM’s entire range of motorcycles is now equipped with ABS
Jan 22, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
What’s The New KTM RC 390 Going To Be Like?
The recently unveiled 390 Adventure has got us thinking
Nov 18, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which one is better R15 v3 or KTM RC 200?
- We rode the new R15 v3.0 on both the racetrack and in the real world. While the R15 has grown larger and more powerful, it needs a certain level of expertise to tame. The more committed ergonomics make for an uncomfortable ride in the city. If you are looking for a dynamically competent bike that you’d like to hone your riding skills on and don't mind the committed riding position, the Yamaha R15 v 3.0 is the one to go for. It's a bike we'd love to have in our garage but its ergonomics limit its practicality. That's the reason it can not be our primary everyday bike. On the other hand, the RC 200 has set the bar quite high for the entry-level sports bike segment. The committed ergonomics might not be everyone’s cup of tea but if you are looking for cornering dynamics with an added dose of power but are on a budget, your search ends here.Read More: - 2017 KTM RC 200: First Ride Review In Images: https://www.zigwheels.com/gallery/bikesslideshow/2017-ktm-rc-200-first-ride-review-in-images/27324/1/1 - Yamaha R15 v3.0 Road Test Review: https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/yamaha-r15-v30-road-test-review/30566/
- Both are best in there own ways.For RC 200:1)Engine is much better than R15 V3 2) Initial power is more3)Fuel Efficiency:35-45 km/L4) Maintenance cost is more comparing to V35)Top speed:138Km/H6)No vibration at all7) Excellent brightness for the both Dim & Highbeam For R15 V3:1) Fuel Efficiency:45-502) Maintenance cost is less3) Initial power is less comparing to Rc2004)Top speed: 160Km/H 5)Low brightness for the headlights
- RC 200 much better option than R15 V3 but only if you budget permits it provides an adjustable suspension with the very other body that can do well on track as well as on normal roads but if you are running short on budget then go for an 583 has optimum performance with in its budget.
Q. Which is better KTM RC 390 or KTM 390 Duke
- There is no doubt in this tht KTM is highly reputed company but I want to share my experience, I have ktm rc390 and have done hardly 29000 km on it. You can check me service records, all services are before time.. but my bike has started leaving black smoke. It has just done 29000km and leaving black smoke. It's engine oil level decrease drastically.I have give my bike in ktm service station, total cost is above 50000 Rs. That too it l take month to get repaired. Once u have purchased this bike, there is no good support from KTM. Every one is just looting money from you. You can just imagine the quality of engine which starts burning engine oil just after 29000 km.
- My bike is ktm rc 390 ...Why i choosed this model because first of all i think rc is looking more musculr than duke ...if we look at its specifications both rc and duke having the same except its handling and ride postureBefore rc i had r15/pulsar 220 both are more or less same on its riding posture and handlingIf we look at duke its a staright sitting naked bike And i test drived once at that time i felt its little hard to ride in traffic means to do very tricky to make a fast manoeuvre rest in highways it gives a good rodong posture with no back pain or shoulder painThen also why i choose rc my mainly because of its handling and look
- Both are powerful performance bikes...they are made to do drift or race..drift bi Duke 390 with supetmoto mode in which you can unlock rear abs for drifting lowers..can be used for short commute not touring..Rc 390 is a proper race track beast for leaning in the track..ultimate midrange..handling...which one is better? buy according to your needs...but Duke does all what rc does and more with supetmoto mode...
Q. Between KTM RC 125 and KTM RC 200, which one is good and affordable for a middle class family?
View More Questions
- The KTM RC 125 is priced at Rs. 1.47 lakh (ex-showroom, Delhi) whereas, KTM RC 200 is priced at Rs. 1.91 lakh (ex-showroom, Delhi). At this price point, KTM RC 125 seems a tad expensive and does not justify the pricing, on the other hand, RC 200 offers a good list of features & cycle parts and best performance in the segment and the asking price is also justifiable. Thus, going with the RC 200 would be a better option if you are looking for a value-for-money offering. In order to know which bike would be a more suitable companion, we'd recommend taking a test ride. Please click on the following link and select your city accordingly for the dealership details - KTM Bike Showrooms Read more: - KTM RC 125 vs KTM RC 200 Comparison
- Hi I wanted to know if I buy from you to bring to Bangladesh what should I do if possible
- KTM RC 125
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
