KTM RC 200 vs KTM RC 390 Comparison
KTM RC 200 vs KTM RC 390
KTM RC 390 Price starts at Rs. 2.44 lakh which is Rs. 53,384 costlier than KTM RC 200 priced at Rs. 1.91 lakh. The claimed mileage for the KTM RC 200 is 32 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for KTM RC 390 is 25 kmpl. In technical specifications, KTM RC 200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine where as KTM RC 390 is powered by 373.2 cc engine. KTM RC 200 is available in 2 different colours while KTM RC 390 comes with 2 colours. 54% users have chosen KTM RC 390 over KTM RC 200 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare KTM RC 200 vs KTM RC 390 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Engine
| Engine Type | 1-Cylinder, 4-Stroke, DOHC Engine | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, DOHC Engine |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 373.2 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 25.83 PS @ 10000 rpm | 43.5 PS @ 9000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | ||
| Bore | 72 mm | 89 mm |
| Stroke | 49 mm | 60 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel System | ||
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment | |
| Compression Ratio | 14.5:1 | 14.5:1 |
| Engine Immobilizer | ||
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 6 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| Braking Type |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ||
| Quarter Mile | ||
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | ||
| 20-80 kmph (kickdown) | ||
| 30-70 kmph (3rd gear) | ||
| 40-80 kmph (4th gear) | ||
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | ||
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | ||
| Mileage (City) | ||
| Mileage (Highway) | ||
| Mileage (Overall) | 32 kmpl | |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 25 kmpl | |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | ||
| Top Speed (Km/h) | ||
| 0-160 kmph | ||
| Braking 60-0 km/h |
Suspension
| Chassis Type | ||
| Suspension-Front | WP Upside-Down Fork Ø 43 mm | WP Upside-Down Ø 43 mm |
| Chassis | Steel Trellis Frame, Powder Coated | Steel trellis frame, powder-coated |
| Suspension-Rear | WP Monoshock | WP Monoshock |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-110/70 - 17, Rear :-150/60 - 17 | Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch |
| Tyre Make | ||
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | Yes |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 29 psi | |
| Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion) |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | 153 kg | 147 kg |
| Length*Width*Height | 1978*688*1098 | 2145*760*830 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1340 mm | 1340 mm |
| Length | 1978 mm | 2145 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 178.5 mm | 178.5 mm |
| Height | 1098 mm | 830 mm |
| Seat Height | 835 mm | 820 mm |
| Width | 688 mm | 760 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 9.5 L | 10 L |
| Kerb Weight | ||
| Total Weight | ||
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 300 mm | 320 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 230 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Maintenance Free | |
| Charging Time | ||
| Motor Type | ||
| Motor Power | ||
| Fast Charging | ||
| Battery | ||
| Range | ||
| Head Lamp | ||
| Projector head light | ||
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights | ||
| Seat Opening Switch | ||
| Boot Light | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | LED |
| Alternator | ||
| Power Modes |
Features
| Cruise Control | ||
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Bikes | Sports Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Handle Type | Clip On | |
| Tachometer | ||
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Charging point | ||
| Average Fuel economy | ||
| Digital Fuel Indicator | ||
| Distance to Empty | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | Yes |
| External Fuel Filling | ||
| Clock | ||
| Stand Alarm | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ||
| Passenger Backrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage | ||
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | ||
| Shutter Lock | ||
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Central Locking | ||
| Navigation | ||
| Mobile Connectivity | No | No |
| EBS | ||
| Service Due Indicator | ||
| Switchable ABS | ||
| DRLs | ||
| Keyless Ignition |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 30000 |
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is the best 200cc bike - RC 200?
- Yes if you love doing corners
Q. Should I buy a RC 390 or wait for new model. I am afraid new model is not that sporty as seen on pictures.
- Yes bro..I too have the same opinion.will ktm compromise track riding ergonomics and make upright stance better for roads...then it will k**l the rc concept...I too is worried..even the initial colour schemes were good...if any real picture is out ..go for current rc you will not regret..ser r15s story..
- Your choice agar thumha rc 390 buy karna ha to kharidlo ya phir new model kharidna ha to kharido
- RC 390 launch might be delayed as they did not showcase it this time.
Q. KTM RC 390 and Bajaj dominor 400 which is better?
- If you're coming from R15 then you can jump in RC. if you're planning for Cruzin long rides leh and all go with dominar. Dominar it's a overall package but lacks in character while RC has a character aggressive, swift.
- Rc 390...those who need to save money can go for updated dominar 400( good for touring too).
- RC 390 is great on track. Dominar is great for touring