×

KTM Duke 200 vs KTM RC 200 Comparison

KTM Duke 200 vs KTM RC 200

KTM RC 200 Price starts at Rs. 1.91 lakh which is Rs. 28,377 costlier than KTM 200 Duke priced at Rs. 1.62 lakh. The claimed mileage for the KTM 200 Duke is 35 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for KTM RC 200 is 32 kmpl. In technical specifications, KTM 200 Duke is powered by 199.5 cc engine where as KTM RC 200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine. KTM 200 Duke is available in 4 different colours while KTM RC 200 comes with 2 colours. 54% users have chosen KTM RC 200 over KTM 200 Duke in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare KTM 200 Duke vs KTM RC 200 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

200 Duke vs RC 200 Specs Overview

Specs/Features 200 Duke BS6RC 200 BS6
Price Rs. 1.72 lakh Rs. 1.97 lakh
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 199.5 cc 199.5 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 25 PS @ 10,000 rpm 25 PS @ 10000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 199.5 cc 199.5 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 25 PS @ 10,000 rpm 25 PS @ 10000 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm) 19.3 Nm @ 8000 rpm 19.2 Nm @ 8000 rpm
Emission Type bs6 bs6
Bore 72 mm 72 mm
Stroke 49 mm 49 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 4 4
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Ignition Digital Ignition Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment
Compression Ratio 11.3:1 14.5:1
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 6 Speed 6 Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Suspension-Front WP-USD Ø 43 mm WP-USD Ø 43 mm
Chassis Split Steel Trellis Frame Steel Trellis Frame
Suspension-Rear WP-Monoshock WP Monoshock
Tyre Size Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 Front :-110/70 - 17, Rear :-150/60 - 17
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Dry Weight 150.3 kg 154.3 kg
Length*Width*Height 2050*730*810 1978*688*1098
Wheelbase(mm) 1367 mm 1340 mm
Length 2050 mm 1978 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 170 mm 178.5 mm
Height 810 mm 1098 mm
Seat Height 810 mm 835 mm
Width 730 mm 688 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 13.5 L 9.5 L
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 300 mm 300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 230 mm 230 mm
Pilot Lamps ...
LED tail lights
Turn Signal Lamp LED LED
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Body Type Sports Naked Bikes Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Split Split
Pass Switch
Speedometer Digital Digital
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Average Fuel economy
Distance to Empty
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Stepup Seat ...
Low Oil Indicator
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights ...
Passenger Backrest ...
Underseat storage ...
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid Cooled
Console Digital Digital
Anti Theft Alarm ...
Odometer Digital Digital

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which would win KTM RC 200 VS KTM 200 Duke?
  • Ever since its debut, the KTM 200 Duke has been the benchmark bike of its segment and still remains so. If you’re looking for a bike that offers great acceleration, loves to corner and has a hooligan nature, the 200 Duke is the bike for you and a great option for someone entering the world of performance bikes. The only grouse we have with the KTM 200 Duke is its super stiff ride quality and the fact that ABS isn’t offered even as an option. On the other hand, the RC 200 has set the bar quite high for the entry-level sports bike segment. The committed ergonomics might not be everyone’s cup of tea but if you are looking for cornering dynamics with an added dose of power but are on a budget, your search ends here. We would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
  • Actually they're built on same platform but different in characters duke is of naked street bike and can be used day to day use with comfort because of the upright sitting posture,Coming to rc the name RC stands for Road /Competition i.e made for road and track equally but i say it is completely best suited for track /track days the clip on handle bars with lower seat on RC gives you discomfort on rough roads or if you ride for longer hours even on uneven roads u can feel every bit of it... So there is no WIN OR LOSE both are best in there own ways
  • No difference as their topspeed is limited till 136kmph as far as drag race is concerned.KTM RC is known for trackdays.Duke is basically jack of all trades.Also do a test ride as ergonamically Duke is better, but still everyone has different taste you may like aggressive stance of rc so test ride will be great
View All Answers
Q. I am going to buy a bike, I am really confused between KTM RC 200 or KTM 200 Duke, you guys suggest me a good bike. I am not a long rider, or a street freak, but the bike has to look stylish.
  • Looks are subjective and only you can decide on your own..th duke 200 beats the rc200 in comfort and practicality and The rc is track focus bike and the design, handlebars etc everything is set according to that so there won't be offering of comfort and all set to target the immense feel of riding & riding posture, even the smallest bump you can feel it and no matter what & how many techniques you use to drive at end of the long traffic day you end up hurting your wrist & back, coming to track & highway it gives hell lot of fun compared to Duke 200..The duke 200 is practical bike & posture is set in that way completely upright you can drive all day happily with out hurting anything.The suspension setup is Same for both it is on stiffer side but duke 200 is better on p*t holes and speedbraker because of upright posture. On highway the windblast turns the duke 200 down because of street naked design which the RC has the advantage over that.
  • If you like Nude bikes then you can go for 200 Duke & if you want to look stylish & want to feel the racing bike then go for RC200.As i am also a RC 200 Owner.
  • Take a spin on both bikes.But according to your requirement RC will suit you.But RC is costlier than Duke in both service and Intial price
View All Answers
Q. Which one is better R15 v3 or KTM RC 200?
  • We rode the new R15 v3.0 on both the racetrack and in the real world. While the R15 has grown larger and more powerful, it needs a certain level of expertise to tame. The more committed ergonomics make for an uncomfortable ride in the city. If you are looking for a dynamically competent bike that you’d like to hone your riding skills on and don't mind the committed riding position, the Yamaha R15 v 3.0 is the one to go for. It's a bike we'd love to have in our garage but its ergonomics limit its practicality. That's the reason it can not be our primary everyday bike. On the other hand, the RC 200 has set the bar quite high for the entry-level sports bike segment. The committed ergonomics might not be everyone’s cup of tea but if you are looking for cornering dynamics with an added dose of power but are on a budget, your search ends here.Read More: - 2017 KTM RC 200: First Ride Review In Images: https://www.zigwheels.com/gallery/bikesslideshow/2017-ktm-rc-200-first-ride-review-in-images/27324/1/1 - Yamaha R15 v3.0 Road Test Review: https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/yamaha-r15-v30-road-test-review/30566/
  • Both are best in there own ways.For RC 200:1)Engine is much better than R15 V3 2) Initial power is more3)Fuel Efficiency:35-45 km/L4) Maintenance cost is more comparing to V35)Top speed:138Km/H6)No vibration at all7) Excellent brightness for the both Dim & Highbeam For R15 V3:1) Fuel Efficiency:45-502) Maintenance cost is less3) Initial power is less comparing to Rc2004)Top speed: 160Km/H 5)Low brightness for the headlights
  • RC 200 much better option than R15 V3 but only if you budget permits it provides an adjustable suspension with the very other body that can do well on track as well as on normal roads but if you are running short on budget then go for an 583 has optimum performance with in its budget.
View All Answers
View More Questions