Kawasaki Ninja 400 vs Kawasaki Z650 Comparison

Kawasaki Ninja 400 vs Kawasaki Z650

Kawasaki Z650 Price starts at Rs. 5.69 lakh which is Rs. 70,000 costlier than Kawasaki Ninja 400 priced at Rs. 4.99 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Kawasaki Ninja 400 is 24.5 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Kawasaki Z650 is 21.2 kmpl. In technical specifications, Kawasaki Ninja 400 is powered by 399 cc engine where as Kawasaki Z650 is powered by 649 cc engine. Kawasaki Ninja 400 is available in 1 different colours while Kawasaki Z650 comes with 2 colours. 59% users have chosen Kawasaki Z650 over Kawasaki Ninja 400 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Kawasaki Ninja 400 vs Kawasaki Z650 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

Engine Type Parallel Twin, 4-stroke, DOHC Parallel Twin, 4-stroke, 8-Valves, DOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 399 cc 649 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 49 PS @ 10000 rpm 68 PS @ 8000 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm)
Bore 70 mm 83 mm
Stroke 51.8 mm 60 mm
No Of Cylinders 2 2
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 4 4
Fuel System
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Ignition Digital Digital
Compression Ratio 11.5:1 10.8:1
Engine Immobilizer
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 6-Speed 6 speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Braking Type
0-60 kmph (sec) 2.44s
Quarter Mile 13.89s@ 152.25kmph 13.32 s @ 119 kmph
Braking (60-0 kmph) 2.34 s, 16.67 mm 17.15m
20-80 kmph (kickdown)
30-70 kmph (3rd gear)
40-80 kmph (4th gear)
Braking (80-0 kmph) 2.97 s, 28.98 mm 31.38m
Braking (100-0 kmph) 3.63 s, 45.50 mm
Mileage (City) 24.5 kmpl 21.16 kmpl
Mileage (Highway) 30.41 kmpl 23.77 kmpl
Mileage (Overall) 25 kmpl
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl 21.16 kmpl
0-100 kmph (sec) 5.40s 4.48s
Top Speed (Km/h)
0-160 kmph
Braking 60-0 km/h 2.34 s, 16.67 mm 17.15m
Chassis Type
Suspension-Front 41mm Telescopic Fork ø41 mm Telescopic Fork
Chassis Trellis, High-Tensile Steel Trellis, High-Tensile Steel
Suspension-Rear Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock with adjustable preload Horizontal back-link with adjustable preload
Tyre Size Front :-110/70-R17, Rear :-150/60-R17 Front :-120/70-ZR17 Rear :- 160/60-ZR17
Wheel Size Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch Front :-17 inch Rear :-17 inch
Tyre Make
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Radial Tyre Yes Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Dry Weight
Length*Width*Height 2020*710*1120 2055*775*1080
Wheelbase(mm) 1370 mm 1410 mm
Length 2020 mm 2055 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 140 mm 130 mm
Height 1120 mm 1080 mm
Seat Height 785 mm 790 mm
Width 710 mm 775 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 14 L 15 L
Kerb Weight
Total Weight
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 310 mm 300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 220 mm 220 mm
Battery Type
Charging Time
Motor Type
Motor Power
Fast Charging
Head Lamp
Projector head light
Pilot Lamps
LED tail lights
Seat Opening Switch
Boot Light
Turn Signal Lamp LED LED
Power Modes
Cruise Control
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Body Type Sports Bikes Sports Naked Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Split Split
Pass Switch Yes Yes
Speedometer Digital Digital
Handle Type
Tachometer Analogue
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Charging point
Average Fuel economy
Digital Fuel Indicator
Distance to Empty
Low Fuel Warning Lamp Yes
External Fuel Filling
Clock Digital
Stand Alarm
Low Battery Indicator Yes
Stepup Seat
Low Oil Indicator
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
Passenger Backrest
Carry hook
Underseat storage
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid Cooled
Console Analogue and Digital Digital
Anti Theft Alarm
Shutter Lock
Odometer Digital Digital
Central Locking
Mobile Connectivity No
Service Due Indicator
Switchable ABS
Keyless Ignition
Standard Warranty (Years)
Standard Warranty (kilometers)

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. I currently own a Duke 390, 2018 model and my usage is mostly for commuting and weekend rides. Is Z650 a good upgrade keeping in mind the above?
  • I have a Z650 and had a Duke390 my advice is don't do it. The Duke is heaps more fun and corners way better. The stock Z tires are outright dangerous in the rain and the suspensions are soft and comfortable which are not suitable for cornering. Since you have a Duke I already know comfort and soft suspensions are not your gig. I regret my upgrade so I hope you don't make the same mistake as I did. I have it for about 1 year now and I am looking to trade it in. To be honest, I would rather get the Benelli 600i since that has 4 cylinders and adjustable shocks. The Z forks are not inverted and non adjustable. I would advise getting a used duke690 or if you have the cash go for the 790. I am not from India so I don't the the prices there but around the price of the Z you could check out the Yamaha MT-07 the only reason I didn't get it was because the MT-07 didn't have abs the year I was getting the Z and I feel that ABS is a must for me. The MT-07 is a faster bike. More horse power and torque weights about the same and has a bigger community. It's resale value is also higher. The Z feels very cheap in the feel of the dash (no average speed of trip like the duke) it looks good but I prefer the Yamaha. It's brighter and cleaner. The Z dash is often too dim in the sun. By no means I am bashing the Z. It's a good bike. It's dependable and good on fuel but it feels like a sedan instead of a sports car if you want to make a comparison with cars. The Duke is a hard bike to beat if you exclude the reliability issues but the fun is much more rewarding then the flaws. I mean I had 3 cracked airboxes and 1 head gasket in 2 years with the duke. All covered by warranty and I get to hang out at the KTM shops. I had no problems with the z so far except I lowsided the day I picked it up because I was hitting a corner that I hit everyday on the duke the same way with new tires and wasn't used to the springy soft suspensions. It all depends on what you want. I would say MT-07 or TnT 600i if you are buying brand new for about the same price. 600i has highest hp out of the 3 and has adjustable suspensions. Mt-07 is same price as the Z and has more torque and hp. Z excels in the braking out of them all but I can't say I like it's handling and I'm 5'11 and feel cramped on it. I can flat foot on it and it fits my wife who is 5'8. Just a side note the Z also has no immoblizer so it can be easily stolen. I had to replace a key after I lost it and the shop I normally go to told me to go to Kawasaki for key programming but it turns out all Thailand assembled Kawasakis don't have immoblizers.
  • Z650 is one bike that fits in all the squares and go ahead blindfolded in case you're a good practical biker. If you're interested in sound and heat and image concious with no brainers on handling and peace of mind you're not a Z candidate.
  • The Kawasaki Z650 has been designed to have a comfortable ergonomics for the rider. You can comfortably ride this bike in the city or for their daily commuting.
View All Answers
Q. Which one Ninja 650 or Ninja 400, I am confused due to price?
  • I depends on you 650 is a sports tourer where as 400 is a sports bike
  • Ninja 400 the best
  • Ninja650
Q. Ninja 400 or Benelli TNT300 which is good?
  • If you needed a sports bike for long running on the highways then you can go for Kawasaki Ninja 400 whereas if you need a naked-racer for stiff city rides then you can go for Benelli TNT 300. But to know more about this we suggest you take a test ride of the vehicle and then decide.
  • Depends....my first bike is 400. No issues so far. City drive...no problem....freeway 90mph is like okay. No vibration at all. Can go more than 90 if i want to. But i have kids so better for me to ride around 90mphish. Heheheh
  • Both are in differend segmentsninja 400 is a sports bikeBenelli TNT 300 is naked sportsdepends all on your taste
View More Questions