×

Jawa Perak vs KTM RC 390 Comparison

Jawa Perak vs KTM RC 390

KTM RC 390 Price starts at Rs. 2.44 lakh which is Rs. 48,514 costlier than Jawa Perak priced at Rs. 1.96 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Jawa Perak is NA where as the claimed mileage for KTM RC 390 is 25 kmpl. In technical specifications, Jawa Perak is powered by 334 cc engine where as KTM RC 390 is powered by 373.2 cc engine. Jawa Perak is available in 1 different colours while KTM RC 390 comes with 2 colours. 51% users have chosen Jawa Motorcycles Perak over KTM RC 390 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Jawa Perak vs KTM RC 390 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

Engine Type Single Cylinder, Four Stroke, Liquid Cooled, DOHC BS-VI Engine Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, DOHC Engine
Engine Displacement (CC) 334 cc 373.2 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 30 PS 43.5 PS @ 9000 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm) 31 Nm 35 Nm @ 7000 rpm
Bore 81 mm 89 mm
Stroke 65 mm 60 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 4 4
Fuel System
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Ignition
Compression Ratio 11:01 14.5:1
Engine Immobilizer
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 6 Speed 6 Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Braking Type
0-60 kmph (sec)
Quarter Mile
Braking (60-0 kmph)
20-80 kmph (kickdown)
30-70 kmph (3rd gear)
40-80 kmph (4th gear)
Braking (80-0 kmph)
Braking (100-0 kmph)
Mileage (City)
Mileage (Highway)
Mileage (Overall)
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl 25 kmpl
0-100 kmph (sec)
Top Speed (Km/h)
0-160 kmph
Braking 60-0 km/h
Chassis Type
Suspension-Front Telescopic Hydraulic Fork WP Upside-Down Ø 43 mm
Chassis Double cradle Tubular Frame Steel trellis frame, powder-coated
Suspension-Rear Mono Shock Absorber, 7 Step Adjustable WP Monoshock
Tyre Size Front :-100/90-18 Rear :-140/70-17 Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17
Wheel Size Front :-18 inch Rear :-17 inch Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch
Tyre Make
Tyre Type Tube Tubeless
Radial Tyre Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Dry Weight 147 kg
Length*Width*Height 2145*760*830
Wheelbase(mm) 1485 mm 1340 mm
Length 2145 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 178.5 mm
Height 830 mm
Seat Height 750 mm 820 mm
Width 760 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 14 L 10 L
Kerb Weight
Total Weight
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 280 mm 320 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 240 mm 230 mm
Battery Type
Charging Time
Motor Type
Motor Power
Fast Charging
Battery
Range
Head Lamp
Projector head light
Pilot Lamps
LED tail lights
Seat Opening Switch
Boot Light
Turn Signal Lamp Bulb LED
Alternator
Power Modes
Cruise Control
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Body Type Cruiser Bikes Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Single Split
Pass Switch Yes Yes
Speedometer Analogue Digital
Handle Type Clip On
Tachometer
Trip Meter Digital
Charging point
Average Fuel economy
Digital Fuel Indicator
Distance to Empty
Low Fuel Warning Lamp Yes
External Fuel Filling
Clock
Stand Alarm
Low Battery Indicator Yes Yes
Stepup Seat
Low Oil Indicator Yes
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
Passenger Backrest
Carry hook
Underseat storage
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid Cooled
Console Analogue and Digital Digital
Anti Theft Alarm
Shutter Lock
Odometer Digital Digital
Central Locking
Navigation
Mobile Connectivity No No
EBS
Service Due Indicator
Switchable ABS
DRLs
Keyless Ignition
Standard Warranty (Years)
Standard Warranty (kilometers)

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is better KTM RC 390 or KTM 390 Duke
  • There is no doubt in this tht KTM is highly reputed company but I want to share my experience, I have ktm rc390 and have done hardly 29000 km on it. You can check me service records, all services are before time.. but my bike has started leaving black smoke. It has just done 29000km and leaving black smoke. It's engine oil level decrease drastically.I have give my bike in ktm service station, total cost is above 50000 Rs. That too it l take month to get repaired. Once u have purchased this bike, there is no good support from KTM. Every one is just looting money from you. You can just imagine the quality of engine which starts burning engine oil just after 29000 km.
  • My bike is ktm rc 390 ...Why i choosed this model because first of all i think rc is looking more musculr than duke ...if we look at its specifications both rc and duke having the same except its handling and ride postureBefore rc i had r15/pulsar 220 both are more or less same on its riding posture and handlingIf we look at duke its a staright sitting naked bike And i test drived once at that time i felt its little hard to ride in traffic means to do very tricky to make a fast manoeuvre rest in highways it gives a good rodong posture with no back pain or shoulder painThen also why i choose rc my mainly because of its handling and look
  • Both are powerful performance bikes...they are made to do drift or race..drift bi Duke 390 with supetmoto mode in which you can unlock rear abs for drifting lowers..can be used for short commute not touring..Rc 390 is a proper race track beast for leaning in the track..ultimate midrange..handling...which one is better? buy according to your needs...but Duke does all what rc does and more with supetmoto mode...
View All Answers
Q. Which is best KTM RC390 or Kawasaki Ninja 300
  • Writing my thoughts assuming you are going to use the bike in city and daily commute.Yamaha R3....Most Reliable, Fuel Efficient, Comfortable, can be used for city commute as well as for touring and has a very linear power delivery. It is little costly than the KTM RC but cheaper than the Ninja. But you can use it as long as you want it in your garage and will give you a better resale price as well. For Ninja, it is not at all reliable, and comes with a lot of maintainence cost - ride it or don't ride! Also its not a VFM machine. It is comfortable and little fuel efficient, but lacks service convenience as compared to Yamaha.For KTM RC, not at all comfortable, it is way too track focused and I assume you don't live on tracks here in India. Not at all a reliable machine and will stay good for a couple of years (can't ignore it's manufactured by Bajaj) and will show its ageing after that with service costs and sudden breakdowns. It is the cheapest sport bike out there in that range, but is certainly not the most ideal chose to make.
  • Rc390 is fun bike for short rides. But it heats a lot in busy traffic. I do agree with you about service and spare parts of ktm bikes. But if you live in capital cities like the Delhi, lucknow, Mumbai, pune etc then you don't have to worry about ninja bikes too. Ninja will always last longer than ktm. And you will get mob attention too while riding. Ninja is always a premium bike. Enjoy this, it requires handling with care! Also, you would love to see ninja 300 beating Rc390 in terms of top speed
  • Both have their pros and cons...refinement is flawless in Ninja and there are no vibrations as it's a parallel twin setup. RC has a very aggressive seating where as Ninja is very comfortable...In terms of after sales service and spare parts, KTM scores as Kawasaki service is very expensive
View All Answers
Q. Which is most comfortable for long rides RC 390, RC 200 or Duke 200?
  • Rc 200 cz its seat cushion and comfort is much better than the Duke 200 and Rc 390 which is stiff as compared to Rc 200
  • Engine wise the 390 will be more relaxed at high speeds but the duke is more easy on your body
  • DUKE 200
View All Answers
View More Questions