×

Jawa Perak vs KTM RC 200 Comparison

Jawa Perak vs KTM RC 200

KTM RC 200 Price starts at Rs. 1.97 lakh which is Rs. 1,268 costlier than Jawa Perak priced at Rs. 1.96 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Jawa Perak is NA where as the claimed mileage for KTM RC 200 is NA....read more

Perak vs RC 200 Specs Overview

Specs/Features Perak STDRC 200 BS6
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.96 lakhView On Road Price Rs. 1.97 lakhView On Road Price
Rating
4.4
(47 Ratings)
4.2
(506 Ratings)
Engine Type Single Cylinder, Four Stroke, Liquid Cooled, SI Engine, DOHC Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 334 cc 199.5 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 30 PS 25 PS @ 10000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Digital
Engine Type Single Cylinder, Four Stroke, Liquid Cooled, SI Engine, DOHC Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 334 cc 199.5 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 30 PS 25 PS @ 10000 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm) 31 Nm 19.2 Nm @ 8000 rpm
Emission Type bs6 bs6
Bore 81 mm 72 mm
Stroke 65 mm 49 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 4 4
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Ignition ... Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment
Compression Ratio 11:01 14.5:1
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 6 Speed 6 Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Suspension-Front Telescopic Hydraulic Fork WP-USD Ø 43 mm
Chassis Double Cradle Tubular Frame Steel Trellis Frame
Suspension-Rear Mono Shock Absorber, 7 Step Adjustable WP Monoshock
Tyre Size Front :-100/90-18 Rear :-140/70-17 Front :-110/70 - 17, Rear :-150/60 - 17
Wheel Size Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type Tube Tubeless
Radial Tyre ...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
Dry Weight ... 154.3 kg
Length*Width*Height ... 1978*688*1098
Wheelbase(mm) 1485 mm 1340 mm
Length ... 1978 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) ... 178.5 mm
Height ... 1098 mm
Seat Height 750 mm 835 mm
Width ... 688 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 14 L 9.5 L
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 280 mm 300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 240 mm 230 mm
LED tail lights
Turn Signal Lamp Bulb LED
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Body Type Cruiser Bikes Sports Bikes
Body Graphics ...
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Single Split
Pass Switch
Speedometer Analogue Digital
Trip Meter ... Digital
Average Fuel economy ...
Distance to Empty ...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp ...
Clock ...
Low Battery Indicator
Low Oil Indicator ...
Passenger Footrest ...
Projector Headlights ...
Underseat storage ...
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid Cooled
Console Analogue and Digital Digital
Odometer Digital Digital

News Updates on Perak and RC 200

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which one is better R15 v3 or KTM RC 200?
  • We rode the new R15 v3.0 on both the racetrack and in the real world. While the R15 has grown larger and more powerful, it needs a certain level of expertise to tame. The more committed ergonomics make for an uncomfortable ride in the city. If you are looking for a dynamically competent bike that you’d like to hone your riding skills on and don't mind the committed riding position, the Yamaha R15 v 3.0 is the one to go for. It's a bike we'd love to have in our garage but its ergonomics limit its practicality. That's the reason it can not be our primary everyday bike. On the other hand, the RC 200 has set the bar quite high for the entry-level sports bike segment. The committed ergonomics might not be everyone’s cup of tea but if you are looking for cornering dynamics with an added dose of power but are on a budget, your search ends here.Read More: - 2017 KTM RC 200: First Ride Review In Images: https://www.zigwheels.com/gallery/bikesslideshow/2017-ktm-rc-200-first-ride-review-in-images/27324/1/1 - Yamaha R15 v3.0 Road Test Review: https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/yamaha-r15-v30-road-test-review/30566/
  • Both are best in there own ways.For RC 200:1)Engine is much better than R15 V3 2) Initial power is more3)Fuel Efficiency:35-45 km/L4) Maintenance cost is more comparing to V35)Top speed:138Km/H6)No vibration at all7) Excellent brightness for the both Dim & Highbeam For R15 V3:1) Fuel Efficiency:45-502) Maintenance cost is less3) Initial power is less comparing to Rc2004)Top speed: 160Km/H 5)Low brightness for the headlights
  • RC 200 much better option than R15 V3 but only if you budget permits it provides an adjustable suspension with the very other body that can do well on track as well as on normal roads but if you are running short on budget then go for an 583 has optimum performance with in its budget.
View All Answers
Q. Between KTM RC 125 and KTM RC 200, which one is good and affordable for a middle class family?
  • The KTM RC 125 is priced at Rs. 1.47 lakh (ex-showroom, Delhi) whereas, KTM RC 200 is priced at Rs. 1.91 lakh (ex-showroom, Delhi). At this price point, KTM RC 125 seems a tad expensive and does not justify the pricing, on the other hand, RC 200 offers a good list of features & cycle parts and best performance in the segment and the asking price is also justifiable. Thus, going with the RC 200 would be a better option if you are looking for a value-for-money offering. In order to know which bike would be a more suitable companion, we'd recommend taking a test ride. Please click on the following link and select your city accordingly for the dealership details - KTM Bike Showrooms Read more: - KTM RC 125 vs KTM RC 200 Comparison
  • Hi I wanted to know if I buy from you to bring to Bangladesh what should I do if possible
  • KTM RC 125
Q. Which is best bike KTM RC 200 or KTM RC 390?
  • It's totally upto your decision. If you are someone who travels a lot then rc would be a very bad decision. Trust me you will surely feel riding a cycle to be less stressful. The power is insane and scary and looks awesome. But don't get deceived by its looks alone. The bike stands out in the crowd but you surely will lose the interest in riding that bike for more than 3-4months. Dukes are the best choice. Wait for the next duke to release. Tons of improvement. Duke 390 has the best console which the rc does not have. So it's any a better choice
  • Depends whether you want more power or bit pocket friendly bike....390 will initially cost you 70k approx more than RC 200. But you will get insane power, which if you are able to handle. For features RC 200 is also going to get abs sooner so that won't be an advantage with RC 390. Coming to more looked factor the mileage...for 390 you will achieve an average of 20-23 kmpl while for RC 200 you can get 32-35 kmpl. Keeping these factors you can decide yourself. Ride safe
  • Ktm 390 is best because it's has more features compare to 200 but 390 is good in highway not in economy mode..its will suffer...ktm 200rc will manage economic mode and beast mode..its suitable for both
View All Answers
View More Questions