Jawa vs Royal Enfield Himalayan Comparison
Jawa vs Royal Enfield Himalayan
Royal Enfield Himalayan Price starts at Rs. 1.81 lakh which is Rs. 16,651 costlier than Jawa priced at Rs. 1.64 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Jawa Jawa is 41.3 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Royal Enfield Himalayan is 29.5 kmpl. In technical specifications, Jawa is powered by 293 cc engine where as Royal Enfield Himalayan is powered by 411 cc engine. Jawa is available in 1 different colours while Royal Enfield Himalayan comes with 5 colours. 59% users have chosen Royal Enfield Himalayan over Jawa Motorcycles Jawa in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Jawa vs Royal Enfield Himalayan on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Engine
| Engine Type | Liquid Cooled, Single Cylinder, DOHC | Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Air cooled, SOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 293 cc | 411 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 27.3 PS | 24.83 PS @ 6500 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | ||
| Bore | 76 mm | 78 mm |
| Stroke | 65 mm | 86 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | |
| Fuel System | ||
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Digital electronic ignition | |
| Compression Ratio | 11:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Engine Immobilizer | ||
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 5 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Disc |
| Braking Type |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 4.07 s | 4.33s |
| Quarter Mile | 18.15 s @ 112.92 kmph | 17.92 s @ 114.66 kmph |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 20.54 mm | 20.74 m |
| 20-80 kmph (kickdown) | ||
| 30-70 kmph (3rd gear) | ||
| 40-80 kmph (4th gear) | ||
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 35.95 mm | 36.14 m |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | 63.50 mm | 56.21 m |
| Mileage (City) | 41.26 kmpl | 36.26 kmpl |
| Mileage (Highway) | 35.64 kmpl | 37.8 kmpl |
| Mileage (Overall) | 37 kmpl | 35 kmpl |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 29.48 kmpl | |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 12.59 s | 11.69s |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | ||
| 0-160 kmph | ||
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 20.54 mm | 20.74 m |
Suspension
| Chassis Type | ||
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic Hydraulic Fork | Telescopic Forks |
| Chassis | Double Cradle | Half-Duplex Split Cradle Frame |
| Suspension-Rear | Gas Canister - Twin shock hydraulic | Monoshock with Linkage |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/90-18 Rear :-120/80-17 | Front :-90/90-21 Rear :-120/90-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-18 inch Rear :-17 inch | Front :-21 inch Rear :-17 inch |
| Tyre Make | ||
| Tyre Type | Tube | Tube |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Spoke | Spoke |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 28 psi | |
| Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion) |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | ||
| Length*Width*Height | 2190*840*1360 | |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1369 mm | 1465 mm |
| Length | 2190 mm | |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 220 mm | |
| Height | 1360 mm | |
| Seat Height | 765 mm | 800 mm |
| Width | 840 mm | |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 14 L | 15 L |
| Kerb Weight | ||
| Total Weight | ||
| Tail Light | Bulb | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 280 mm | 300 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 153 mm | 240 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | MF | |
| Charging Time | ||
| Motor Type | ||
| Motor Power | ||
| Fast Charging | ||
| Battery | ||
| Range | ||
| Head Lamp | ||
| Projector head light | ||
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights | ||
| Seat Opening Switch | ||
| Boot Light | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb |
| Alternator | ||
| Power Modes |
Features
| Cruise Control | ||
| ABS | Single Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Cruiser Bikes | Tourer Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Single | Single |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Analogue | Analogue |
| Handle Type | ||
| Tachometer | Analogue | |
| Trip Meter | Digital | |
| Charging point | ||
| Average Fuel economy | ||
| Digital Fuel Indicator | ||
| Distance to Empty | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | |
| External Fuel Filling | ||
| Clock | ||
| Stand Alarm | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | Yes | |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ||
| Passenger Backrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage | ||
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Analogue | Analogue and Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | ||
| Shutter Lock | ||
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Central Locking | ||
| Navigation | ||
| Mobile Connectivity | ||
| EBS | ||
| Service Due Indicator | ||
| Switchable ABS | ||
| DRLs | ||
| Keyless Ignition |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | ||
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 10000 |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Himalayan or Classic 350, which has the best pillion comfortable seat?
- Both bikes have really good rider and pilloin comfort . HIMALAYAN's seat is a bit higher then classic 350 seat . Pillion can feel a little trouble while taking his position but during Ride the soft seat material helps a lot for both rider and pilloin . Classic 350 seat is quite wider than Himalayan also a little more comfortable . So in my opinion , both bikes have rea good comfort level but if I have to choose between classic and Himalayan than I'll go with classic 350 . Just a little bit of difference, not too much .
- No doubt the Himalayan. The pillion sits higher and the pegs are not rear set. The gel seat helps too.
- Himalayan is more than comfort between the 350
Q. I would like to take some experts advice on selecting a bike. I have a huge confusion in selecting a bike for my own. My choices are Dominor 400 and Himalayan 400. I will mostly ride it for out of city touring in the hills near Siliguri, and later this year I am also planning to do some long rides of North East and Ladakh, I will ride it very rarely in the city maybe twice or thrice a week. I want the comfort feel and the uniqueness to stay on my side. So which bike do you suggest me? Personally I like Royal Enfield Himalayan.
- Both the bikes have their own uniqueness. they are well built for their own purposes. all I could say is when u r on a trip no matter how good the bike is you will get stuck with one or the other problem. at that peak point u would easily find a RE service more easily compared to a bajaj. apart from the service criteria. spokes carry more load at rough terrain compared to an alloy rim
- Go with Himalayan, Best bike available in market for both on road off road adventure .
- I Think the Himalayan is the best
Q. I am little confused over a section of either a Himalayan Sleet or Interceptor 650 for on/off road and of course for touring purpose? kindly suggest which one is better and why?
- It's a tie actually both bikes are really good . When it comes to City or highway rides the interceptor 650 feels better but if are driving through some nasty roads or doing some off Roading then Himalayan is the best.I've chosen Himalayan SLEET over interceptor 650 and dominar 400 .Himalayan have the bestest riding comfort above all of them .
- They are totally different bikes. for daily use u can compare the two bikes. but when it comes to touring your bum is going to hurt on the int 650. go for the himalayan. you wont get the performance of a int 650 but the himalayan wont let you down
- Himalayan