Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Yamaha FZS-FI V3

Honda Hornet 2.0 Price starts at Rs. 1.43 Lakh which is Rs. 30,758 costlier than base model of Yamaha FZS-FI V3 priced at Rs. 1.13 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Honda Hornet 2.0 is 55.77 kmpl whereas the mileage of Yamaha FZS-FI V3 is 55.42 kmpl. In technical specifications, Honda Hornet 2.0 is powered by 184.4 cc engine , while Yamaha FZS-FI V3 is powered by 149 cc engine. Honda Hornet 2.0 is available in 4 different colours while Yamaha FZS-FI V3 comes with 3 colours. The Comparison Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Yamaha FZS-FI V3 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Hornet 2.0 vs FZS-FI V3

Key Highlights Hornet 2.0 STDFZS-FI V3 Matte Red And Matte Grey
Engine Type 4 Stroke, SI Engine Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Max Power 16.99 PS @ 8500 rpm 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm

Hornet 2.0 vs FZS-FI V3 Key Highlights

Basic Info Honda Hornet 2.0 STDYamaha FZS-FI V3 Matte Red And Matte Grey
Rating
44 reviews
545 reviews
Brand Name Honda Yamaha
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.47 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.13 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type 4 Stroke, SI Engine Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Max Power 16.99 PS @ 8500 rpm 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Honda Hornet 2.0 Colors
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 4,239 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 3,247 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 12,033 Hornet 2.0 Insurance Rs. 6,691 FZS-FI V3 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
4 Stroke, SI Engine
Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Engine Displacement
184.40 cc
149 cc
Max Power
16.99 PS @ 8500 rpm
12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Max Torque
15.7 Nm @ 6000 rpm
13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
61 mm
57.3 mm
Stroke
63.096 mm
57.9 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
2
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
9.6 : 1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc

Quarter Mile
18.34
...
Braking (60-0 kmph)
17.04m
...
Braking (80-0 kmph)
30.05m
...
Braking (100-0 kmph)
50.62m
...
Mileage (City)
57.35 kmpl
49.31 kmpl
Mileage (Highway)
55.77 kmpl
55.42 kmpl
Mileage (Overall)
57.35 kmpl
49.31 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
12.91s
...
Top Speed
130 kmph
115 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17 Rear :-140/70-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/60-17
Peak Power
16.99 PS @ 8500 rpm
12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
25 psi
28 psi

Seat height
790 mm
790 mm
Length*Width*Height
2034*783*1064 mm3
1990*780*1080 mm3
Wheelbase
1356 mm
1330 mm
Length
2034 mm
1990 mm
Ground Clearance
168 mm
165 mm
Height
1064 mm
1080 mm
Width
783 mm
780 mm
Fuel Capacity
12 Liters
13 Liters
Kerb Weight
142 Kg
134 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
790 mm
790 mm
Front Brake Diameter
276 mm
282 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
220 mm
220 mm

Additional Features
Honda RoadSync, Range Indicator, Weather Updates, Manage Messages Via Voice Commands, Seat Length - 590 mm, Honda Selectable Torque Control
ECO Indicator, Side Stand Engine Cut Off Switch
Call/SMS Alerts
USB charging port
...
Music control
...
Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 5AH
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
Bulb

Frame
Diamond Type
Diamond Type
ABS
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console
Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
Bluetooth
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Single
Pass Switch
Display
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Mobile Application
...
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Average Fuel economy
...
Distance to Empty Indicator
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
Low Oil Indicator
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Air Cooled
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
...
DRLs

Standard Warranty (Years)
3
2
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
42000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Honda Hornet 2.0
  • Looks very aggressive and sporty
  • Comes with a TFT display with switchable traction control and dual-channel ABS
Yamaha FZS-FI V3
  • Big bike styling and features
  • Smooth engine
Honda Hornet 2.0
  • Makes less power when compared to its rivals
  • Priced higher than its competitors
Yamaha FZS-FI V3
  • Performance isn’t up to the mark
  • The quality of plastics feels sub-par

Is Yamaha FZS-FI V3 Better Than Honda Hornet 2.0?

58% users have chosen Yamaha FZS-FI V3 over Honda Hornet 2.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1594 users have also rated Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Honda Hornet 2.0 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Yamaha FZS-FI V3 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, comfort and features in your bike. But Honda Hornet 2.0 is better on the grounds of maintenance. On the basis of performance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Hornet 2.0 FZS-FI V3
Mileage 4.3 4.2
Performance 4.2 4.2
Comfort 4.4 3.8
Maintenance 3.8 4.0
Features 4.3 4.1
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Videos of Honda Hornet 2.0 and Yamaha FZS-FI V3

Review and Win Banner

Honda Hornet 2.0 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Yamaha FZS-FI V3 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Honda Hornet 2.0 and Yamaha FZS-FI V3

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which one is better Hornet 2.0 & CB 300f. Mostly I have city commute and my priorities are performance and comfortable journey for rider as well as pillion. Which one should I go ?
  • The Honda CB300F offers better performance with its 293.52cc engine, while the Hornet 2.0 is more fuel-efficient with 42.3 kmpl mileage. If you prioritize power and a smooth ride, the CB300F is ideal, but for cost-effective city commuting, the Hornet 2.0 is a great choice. We recommend a test ride to find the best fit for your comfort needs. https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/honda-cb300f-vs-honda-hornet-20
Q. Confused between, FS-Z Fi V3 and MT-15?
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. In nearly every aspect, except maybe ergonomics and braking, the Yamaha FZS-FI v3.0 fails to impress. While its motor offers better fuel efficiency compared to the previous-gen model, it lacks grunt. If you have around Rs 1 lakh to invest, you're better off with say a TVS Apache RTR 160 4V, Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 or the Suzuki Gixxer. Whereas, the Yamaha MT 15 BS6 is more than just the R15 v3 sans fairing. The naked looks sharp is light and can be a hoot to commute. However, the compact riding posture might be a bit too tight for large riders. What is also disheartening is the poor switchgear and build quality as well as the lack of dual-channel ABS. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Apache RTR 1604v 2021 & FZ-S FI V3 Bluetooth model. which one is best suggest me?
  • Selecting the right bike would depend on several factors such as your budget preference on the segment, features required, engine options, brand preference, etc. In nearly every aspect, except maybe ergonomics and braking, the Yamaha FZS-FI v3.0 fails to impress. While its motor offers better fuel efficiency compared to the previous-gen model, it lacks grunt. If you have around Rs 1 lakh to invest, you're better off with say a TVS Apache RTR 160 4V, Bajaj Pulsar NS 160, or the Suzuki Gixxer. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 is powered by a 149 cc engine. This FZS-FI V3 engine generates a power of 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm and a torque of 13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm. The claimed mileage of FZS-FI V3 is 55.42 kmpl. On the other hand, The TVS Apache RTR 160 4V has been the benchmark when it comes to 160cc motorcycles. With the BS6-compliant iteration, TVS has made sure it is still as sprightly, with the '21 update making it the most powerful bike in the 160cc sporty commuter class. The overall package and reasonable pricing make it a true value-for-money motorcycle in its segment. TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is powered by a 159.7 cc engine. This Apache 160 4V engine generates a power of 17.63 PS @ 9250 rpm and a torque of 14.73 Nm @ 7250 rpm. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership.
|Honda Hornet 2.0 Community

Honda Hornet 2.0 Vs Yamaha FZS-FI V3 FAQs

Which bike is best between Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Yamaha FZS-FI V3?
As per the users experiences Honda Hornet 2.0 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for maintenance in your bike. But Yamaha FZS-FI V3 is better on the grounds of mileage, comfort and features. On the basis of performance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Yamaha FZS-FI V3?
The Yamaha FZS-FI V3 is cheaper than Honda Hornet 2.0 by Rs. 34,443.
Which bike offers better performance Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Yamaha FZS-FI V3?
For the STD version, 184.40 cc Petrol engine of Hornet 2.0 produces 16.99 PS @ 8500 rpm of power and 15.7 Nm @ 6000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Matte Red And Matte Grey version, 149 cc Petrol engine of FZS-FI V3 produces 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm of power and 13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences in terms of performance both are same.

Images of Honda Hornet 2.0 and Yamaha FZS-FI V3

Which one do you like more?
Hornet 2.0
Hornet 2.0
FZS-FI V3
FZS-FI V3
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Yamaha FZS-FI V3
×