×

Honda Hornet 2.0 vs TVS Apache 200 4V

TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Price starts at Rs. 1.33 Lakh which is Rs. 1,602 costlier than base model of Honda Hornet 2.0 priced at Rs. 1.32 Lakh. The claimed mileage . In technical specifications, Honda Hornet 2.0 is powered by 184.4 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is powered by 197.75 cc engine. Honda Hornet 2.0 is available in 5 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 200 4V comes with 1 colours. 62% users have chosen TVS Apache RTR 200 4V over Honda Hornet 2.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.

Honda Hornet 2.0 vs TVS Apache 200 4V Comparison

Key Highlights Hornet 2.0 Apache RTR 200 4V
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.32 Lakh Rs. 1.33 Lakh
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 184.4 cc 197.75 cc
Power 17.26 PS @ 8500 rpm 20.82 PS @ 8500 rpm
Read More

Honda Hornet 2.0 vs TVS Apache 200 4V Summary

Basic Info Hornet 2.0 STDApache RTR 200 4V Single-channel ABS
Brand Honda TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.32 Lakh View On Road Price Rs. 1.33 Lakh View On Road Price
Rating
4.1
(244 Ratings)
4.2
(1311 Ratings)
Engine Type 4 Stroke, SI Engine, BS-VI Single-cylinder, 4-stroke, 4-valve, oil-cooled engine
Max Power 17.26 PS @ 8500 rpm 20.82 PS @ 8500 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Hornet 2.0 Colors
Apache RTR 200 4V Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Insurance Rs. 8,472 Hornet 2.0 Insurance Rs. 9,289 Apache RTR 200 4V Insurance

Engine Type
4 Stroke, SI Engine, BS-VI
Single-cylinder, 4-stroke, 4-valve, oil-cooled engine
Engine Displacement
184.4 cc
197.75 cc
Max Power
17.26 PS @ 8500 rpm
20.82 PS @ 8500 rpm
Max Torque
16.1 Nm @ 6000 rpm
16.8 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Emission Type
bs6
bs6
Bore
61 mm
66 mm
Stroke
63.09 mm
57.8 mm
No Of Cylinders
...
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
...
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
...
Mapped ignition system
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
10.0:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc

Quarter Mile
18.87sec @ 107.68kmph
...
Braking (60-0 kmph)
19.67m
16 mm
Braking (80-0 kmph)
34.91m
29.46 mm
Braking (100-0 kmph)
55.11m
...
Mileage (City)
57.35 kmpl
...
Mileage (Highway)
55.77 kmpl
...
Braking 60-0 km/h
19.67m
16 mm

Suspension-Front
Upside down Fork
Telescopic Forks with Preload Adjuster
Chassis
Diamond Type
Double Cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame
Suspension-Rear
Monoshock
Mono Tube - Mono Shock

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17 Rear :-140/70-17
Front :-90/90-17 Rear :-130/70-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Length*Width*Height
2047*783*1064 mm^3
2050*790*1050 mm^3
Wheelbase
1355 mm
1353 mm
Length
2047 mm
2050 mm
Ground Clearance
167 mm
180 mm
Width
783 mm
790 mm
Fuel Capacity
12 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
142 Kg
152 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Diameter
276 mm
270 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
220 mm
240 mm

Battery Type
...
VRLA
Charging at Home
...
Charging at Charging Station
...
Pilot Lamps
...
LED tail lights
X-Shaped LED
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
LED

ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Naked Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Switch
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Air Cooled
Oil Cooled
Console
Digital
Digital
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
...
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Pros
  • Cons

TVS Apache RTR 200 4V

  • Incredible handler; Lot of scope for adjustability; Packs tonnes of modern features
  • including smartphone connectivity

TVS Apache RTR 200 4V

  • Lacks a sixth gear
  • curbing touring possibilities; Slightly cramped lower-body posture for larger riders
Image

Do you own a Car or a
Bike?

  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor

Hornet 2.0 and Apache RTR 200 4V Competitors

News Updates on Hornet 2.0 and Apache RTR 200 4V

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which one to go for Hornet 2.0, Apache RTR 200 4v or Gixxer 250 or wait for Honda CBF 190?
  • The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V has been one of the nicest 200cc motorcycles in India. It is sharp and agile while maintaining a friendly power delivery. The lack of a sixth gear though limits its touring potential. If we talk about Suzuki Gixxer 250, it is comfortable in the city and on the highway to, it has big bike looks and a decent amount of features. However, its brakes could be better and headlight intensity is a little below average. Honda Hornet 2.0 isn't a 200cc bike as per its specifications 184cc engine producing 17.23PS at 8500rpm and 16.1Nm at 6000rpm. If outright performance is not your priority and looking for a comfortable bike for city commutes and want a refined and smooth engine, you may go for Honda Hornet 2.0. Hornet 2.0 is the bike based on Honda CBF 190(international), so we don't see any chance that the brand will sell same bike with two different names in India. You may compare all these bikes accordingly. Do take a test ride in order to get better clarity. Check out authorised dealership details.
  • Absolutely Right
Q. Which is better RTR 200 ABS or Fz25? What is mileage of both?
  • As a owner of rtr 200 4v i am telling you why i chose rtr 200 over fz 25 and then i will tell you why you should opt for fz 25 so let's start with rtr's pros over fz's1.Exhaust note: exhaust note of both the bikes are music to the ear of a rider but in my personal opinion I think RTR's exhaust note is likely superior to that of FZ's 20 exhaust note2. handling characteristics: handling of bobber bikes is so good but RTR's handlingis slightly superior to that of FZ's handling due to the sporty nature of the bike3. suitability: as a short rider I prefer RTR's riding dynamics more than FZS because RTR footpegs is slightly closer to the seat than that of FZS foot pegs so it becomes specially comfortable for short riders while FZ is neutral to the the all size of riders4 pricing: as you know that RTR is is slightly cheaper than FZ and it fulfills my needs also so I preferred RTR over FZnow the points in which which FZ is ahead of RTR1. there is no replacement for displacement: yes it is true because when you will write FZ it will surely feel that it is 250 cc bike and when you will ride RTR then it will give feel of 200 cc bike that exactly it is so if you need more torquey engine more usable power than FZ is quite ahead2: engine refinement: both the bikes are very refined with negligible vibrations but when you're considering specifically for the refinement of the engine then Yamaha is is slightly ahead of TVS and this improves the fuel economy of the FZ i own Apache so I know that its mileage is slightly less than that of every despite of having a smaller engine and slightly less power it gives less mileage so if you love mileage FZ25 should be your pick3: suitability: as I have mentioned earlier that RTR is specially made for shorter riders and it doesn't fits well with the medium-sized rider and the taller riders but it is not the case with the FZ which suits well with all sizes of riders so if you are a rider on taller side FZ should be your pick4. value for money: in spite of RTR being cheaper it is the FZ that is more value for money because it gets bigger engine better mileage and it gets Fi and abs together in that price which is not the case with the RTR rs people because it's a vs model doesn't have Fi so you can not call it value for moneyfinal verdict: both the bikes are very good you cannot go wrong with either of the bikes now it boils down to your personal preference and some subjective opinion that which bike looks more more pleasing to you and which brand is your favourite and the main point is here that what is your budget thanks
  • Both bikes come with 5 gears. engine capacity is different though. I haven’t ridden FZ25. But FZ25 doesn’t comes with ABS and from the safety point of view RTR ABS is good. But few issues with RTR is its stock headlamp doesn’t have enough power for night view, though high beam has enough to see. It comes with Carb only with ABS. Carb seems to feel outdated in this 21st century. On the pros side, it has beautiful weight distribution, the bike feel perfectly balanced to manoeuvre in city traffic, catches 100kmph so sweetly and runs butter smooth. I’ve done 130kmph in my RTR 200 ABS. Instrument cluster has whole lot of information. You don’t need to watch wrist watch or take out your smartphone when you’re late for the office and stucked in the traffic. Clutch feels light (my friend who has Avenger Street 220 said he has got the feel and meaning of Slipper Clutch after riding my machine). FZ25 has refined engine with EFI. But it has ordinary instrument cluster, doesn’t comes with ABS. Bottom line: I would suggest you to wait till 2019 April, you’ll get lot of options to choose from. You’ll get all bikes with ABS and FI will also come in many bikes. Or else EFI will make its way in all bikes from 2020 to comply the BS6 norms. 2019 May also marks the production of BS6 engines from many brands. And if you can’t wait to rev the engine then you should buy RTR ABS as safely is more important than the refinement of EFI (RE Classic 350 the best selling motorcycle of the country still comes CV Carburettor, this has helped me to get my set of wheels). Have a safe ride. Cheers!!!
  • If you want better performance with comfort, go for apache. If you want looks and if you are a speed lover go with FZ.Apache plus points : Fully digital instrument cluster, exhaust sound, Riding posture, comfort, low maintenanceApache drawbacks : halogen headlight, chain noise, neutral gear indicator, tyre sizeFZ plus points : LED headlights, looks, power, broad tyres, instrument clusterFZ drawbacks : price, headlamp spread, relatively high maintenanceALL THE BEST !!! Keep Riding !!!
View All Answers
Q. Should i buy TVS Apache RTR 200 4V ABS or wait for MT-15?
  • See Apache is good for the city ride but don't expect the good milage.....but pick is good.....but take a test drive of the mt-15 so if u feel the bike comfortable and pick over all 360degree u have compare and then u buy
  • Rtr 2004v for race like dynamics...mt 15 is a naked designed for streets.soits up to you.but mt15 can do all which space can do
  • Apache is better than mt 15 and also low cost. It gives you slipper clutch and dual channel abs at Rs. 1.4L on road Kolkata. Where the ex-showroom price of mt 15 is Rs. 1.36 offering only single channel abs
View All Answers
More Questions

Popular Bikes Comparison

  • Trending
  • Scooters
  • Sports
  • Cruisers
  • Commuters
Compare Bikes