×

Hero Xtreme 200S vs TVS Apache 160 4V

Hero Xtreme 200S Price starts at Rs. 1.17 Lakh which is Rs. 9,944 costlier than base model of TVS Apache RTR 160 4V priced at Rs. 1.07 Lakh. The claimed mileage . In technical specifications, Hero Xtreme 200S is powered by 199.6 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is powered by 159.7 cc engine. Hero Xtreme 200S is available in 3 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V comes with 3 colours. 55% users have chosen Hero Moto Corp Xtreme 200S over TVS Apache RTR 160 4V in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.

Hero Xtreme 200S vs TVS Apache 160 4V Comparison

Key Highlights Xtreme 200S Apache RTR 160 4V
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.17 Lakh Rs. 1.07 Lakh
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 199.6 cc 159.7 cc
Power 18.0 PS @ 8500 rpm 16.02 PS @ 8250 rpm

Hero Xtreme 200S vs TVS Apache 160 4V Summary

Specs Xtreme 200S STD BS6Apache RTR 160 4V Drum
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.17 Lakh View On Road Price Rs. 1.07 Lakh View On Road Price
Rating
3.9
(86 Ratings)
4.1
(1727 Ratings)
Engine Type Oil cooled, 4 Stroke single cylinder OHC SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled Engine BS-VI
Max Power 18.0 PS @ 8500 rpm 16.02 PS @ 8250 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Drum
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS ... Single Channel
Starting Kick and Self Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Insurance Rs. 9,009 Xtreme 200S Insurance Rs. 8,842 Apache RTR 160 4V Insurance

Engine Type
Oil cooled, 4 Stroke single cylinder OHC
SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled Engine BS-VI
Engine Displacement
199.6 cc
159.7 cc
Max Power
18.0 PS @ 8500 rpm
16.02 PS @ 8250 rpm
Max Torque
16.4 Nm @ 6500 rpm
14.12 Nm @ 7250 rpm
Emission Type
bs6
bs6
Bore
66.5 mm
62 mm
Stroke
57.5 mm
52.9 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
...
Mapped ignition system
Compression Ratio
10:01
10.0:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Drum

Quarter Mile
...
20.40 s @ 98.91 kmph
Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
22.77m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
42.63m
Mileage (City)
...
54.78 kmpl
Mileage (Highway)
...
49.57 kmpl
Braking 60-0 km/h
...
22.77m

Suspension-Front
Telescopic Front Forks with anti friction bush
Telescopic Forks
Chassis
Diamond Type
Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF
Suspension-Rear
Rectangular swingarm with mono shock
Mono Shock

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-130/70-17
Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-110/80-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Length*Width*Height
2062*778*1106 mm^3
2035*790*1050 mm^3
Wheelbase
1338 mm
1357 mm
Length
2062 mm
2035 mm
Ground Clearance
165 mm
180 mm
Height
1106 mm
1050 mm
Seat Height
795 mm
800 mm
Width
778 mm
790 mm
Fuel Capacity
12.8 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
154.5 Kg
147 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Diameter
276 mm
270 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
220 mm
130 mm

Battery Type
...
Maintenance Free
Pilot Lamps
...
LED Pilot Lamps
LED tail lights
LED Lamp
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
LED

ABS
...
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Starting
Kick and Self Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Switch
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Stepup Seat
...
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Oil Cooled
Oil Cooled
Console
Digital
Digital
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Mobile Connectivity
Bluetooth
...
Service Due Indicator
...

Gaad-Store
Sell Your Car in Best Price

Instant money transfer, RC Transfer, Home Inspection

COVID safety assured - Contactless experience in whole process

News Updates on Xtreme 200S and Apache RTR 160 4V

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. I am totally confused between Xtreme 200S and more two bikes, Apache RTR 160 4V and FZ-s V3. I have to ride it in city the as well as highway touring purpose.Which bike should I purchase?
  • Selecting between the options would depend on certain factors such as your budget, features required, ride quality, preference of the segment, etc. The Xtreme 200S could be a good potion if you are looking for a more powerful commuter motorcycle, which looks stylish and generally rides well. On the other hand, the overall package and reasonable pricing make Apache RTR 160 4V a truly value for money motorcycle in its segment.TVS Apache RTR 160 4V has been the benchmark when it comes to 160cc motorcycles and offers great ride quality and handling dynamics and a feature-rich instrument console. As for the Yamaha FZS-FI V3, if fails to impress in every aspect except for the comfortable ergonomics and braking power. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
  • Get the RTR 4v, looks are subjective, but as for performance it's best in the segment.
  • Thanks a lot sir😊🤟
Q. Is the Hero Xtreme 200S better than TVS Apache RTR 160 4V?
  • The TVS Apache RTR 160 4V has been the benchmark when it comes to 160cc motorcycles. With the BS6-compliant iteration, TVS has made sure it is still as sprightly as ever despite the slight drop in power and torque figures. The overall package and reasonable pricing make it a truly value for money motorcycle in its segment. On the other hand, Hero Xtreme 200S is the most affordable full-faired motorcycle in the country, It handles corners quite well. It offers upright, friendly ergonomics and comfortable seating and at its price, it offers great features and power performance. You may compare both bikes accordingly. Do take a test ride in order to get better clarity. Check out authorised dealership details.
  • Pricing is almost similar, but choosing between a fully fared and naked motorcyle depends on your needs. Looks are tollaly subjective.
Q. I am planning to buy a bike next month. I am confused between Apache rtr 160 4v, Hornet 2.0, Honda Unicorn and FZ/S-Fi V3,. Which one should I buy if my priorities are low maintenance cost, good mileage and good riding quality (comfort and handling). I will be commuting to office daily with frequent rides to native village which has bumpy/rural roads with this.
  • I have a similar requirement as yours (in the question), and have test-ridden hero Xtreme 160R, as well; along with the options mentioned above, this is what I noted. With the reviews and verdicts from almost every major auto channel, it was an obvious run. To my surprise, I couldn't find the 'sporty' (rear set foot-pegs) on the Apache RTR 160 4v as comfortable as other bikes - however, TVS's offering was the best in the segment, before the BS6 norms pushed in, due to lower kerb weight and the power figures. The ride quality and handling are superb, plus a decent fuel economy is a pro.Given that I found the ride a bit too tiring for my wrists, and a Honda showroom was next in line, I drove the Hornet 2.0. You hop on to its saddle, and you feel a certain correction in the posture - an upright, wide handlebar setting, with mildly rear-set footpegs, make you stay easy, even at higher speeds - the suspension setup is on the firm side though - the higher cost and the lower fuel economy are the only cons that I could measure at the moment.Next, Hero extreme 160R was a similar offering, just with a refined but slightly weaker engine than the Hornet 2.0 - you miss the pull from the engine to go up and rev it higher - the bike is nimble and a very capable handler of bad roads too. Fuel economy is quite similar to TVS's just the braking improves with the lower weight figures.For the final option, I went in to drive the FZ-S V3 - It was a DELIGHT - you sit even more so relaxed than on any of the previous bikes, and the ride quality is plush! Given that I was riding it right after the previous two, the motor felt far too refined for even the Hornet to match. Better economy and festive deals made it a better choice for me - given the quality, comfort being better than what I had tested and the cost was considerably lower than the other options.The only question that I have in mind is 'How long is the FZ going to continue in India?'; given that spare parts vanish out of Indian markets, as soon as the bike is discontinued.In my opinion, if you prefer an easy-riding style and economy and comfort are a priority, go with Yamaha's 'Lord of The Streets'. Hornet 2.0 also makes a better option if the budget allows, too.
  • I have a similar requirement as yours (in the question), and have test-ridden hero Xtreme 160R, as well; along with the options mentioned above. With the reviews and verdicts from almost every major auto channel, it was an obvious run. To my surprise, I couldn't find the 'sporty' (rear set foot-pegs) on the Apache RTR 160 4v as comfortable as other bikes - however, TVS's offering was the best in the segment, before the BS6 norms pushed in, due to lower kerb weight and the power figures. The ride quality and handling are superb, plus a decent fuel economy is a pro. Given that I found the ride a bit too tiring for my wrists, and a Honda showroom was next in line, I drove the Hornet 2.0. You hop on to its saddle, and you feel a certain correction in the posture - an upright, wide handlebar setting, with mildly rear-set footpegs, make you stay easy, even at higher speeds - the suspension setup is on the firm side though - the higher cost and the lower fuel economy are the only cons that I could measure at the moment. Next, Hero extreme 160R was a similar offering, just with a refined but slightly weaker engine than the Hornet 2.0 - you miss the pull from the engine to go up and rev it higher - the bike is nimble and a very capable handler of bad roads too. Fuel economy is quite similar to TVS's just the braking improves with the lower weight figures.For the final option, I went in to drive the FZ-S V3 - It was a DELIGHT - you sit even more so relaxed than on any of the previous bikes, and the ride quality is plush! Given that I was riding it right after the previous two, the motor felt far too refined for even the Hornet to match. Better economy and festive deals made it a better choice for me - given the quality, comfort being better than what I had tested and the cost was considerably lower than the other options.The only question that I have in mind is 'How long is the FZ going to continue in India?'; given that spare parts vanish out of Indian markets, as soon as the bike is discontinued.In my opinion, if you prefer an easy-riding style and economy and comfort are a priority, go with Yamaha's 'Lord of The Streets'. Hornet 2.0 also makes a better option if the budget allows, too.
  • All these bikes are good enough and easy for pocket to maintain. The TVS Apache RTR 160 4V has been the benchmark when it comes to 160cc motorcycles. With the BS6-compliant iteration, TVS has made sure it is still as sprightly as ever despite the slight drop in power and torque figures. The overall package and reasonable pricing make it a truly value for money motorcycle in its segment. In nearly every aspect, except maybe ergonomics and braking, the Yamaha FZS-FI v3.0 fails to impress. While its motor offers better fuel efficiency compared to the previous-gen model, it lacks grunt. If you have around Rs 1 lakh to invest, you're better off with other options. if you are looking for better power performance, build quality, good features and a more stable bike, you may go for Hornet 2.0. It is comfortable enough and gets a refined and smooth engine too. If we talk about Honda Unicorn, it has always been the go-to bike if you were planning to buy a 150cc commuter. The BS6 update has given the bike a larger motor, while retaining the dynamics of the older bike. It still remains a well-rounded motorcycle, but the BS6 update has come with a hefty price hike.You may compare all these bikes accordingly. Do take a test ride in order to get better clarity. Check out authorised dealership details.
View All Answers
View More Questions

Popular Bikes Comparison

  • Trending
  • Scooters
  • Cruisers
Compare Bikes