Hero XPulse 200T vs TVS Apache 200 4V

TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Price starts at Rs. 1.29 Lakh which is Rs. 13,515 costlier than base model of Hero XPulse 200T priced at Rs. 1.15 Lakh. The claimed mileage . In technical specifications, Hero XPulse 200T is powered by 199.6 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is powered by 197.75 cc engine. Hero XPulse 200T is available in 3 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 200 4V comes with 3 colours. 53% users have chosen Hero Moto Corp XPulse 200T over TVS Apache RTR 200 4V in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.

Hero XPulse 200T vs TVS Apache 200 4V Comparison

Key Highlights XPulse 200T Apache RTR 200 4V
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.15 Lakh Rs. 1.29 Lakh
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 199.6 cc 197.75 cc
Power 18.1 PS @ 8500 rpm Sport : 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm, Urban/ Rain : 17.32 PS @ 7800 rpm
Read More

Hero XPulse 200T vs TVS Apache 200 4V Summary

Basic Info XPulse 200T STD BS6Apache RTR 200 4V Single-channel ABS
Brand Hero Moto Corp TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.15 Lakh View On Road Price Rs. 1.29 Lakh View On Road Price
(60 Ratings)
(1168 Ratings)
Engine Type Oil cooled, 4 Stroke 2 Valve Single cylinder OHC SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled, Fi
Max Power 18.1 PS @ 8500 rpm Sport : 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm, Urban/ Rain : 17.32 PS @ 7800 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
XPulse 200T Colors
Apache RTR 200 4V Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Kick and Self Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Insurance Rs. 8,985 XPulse 200T Insurance Rs. 9,213 Apache RTR 200 4V Insurance

Engine Type
Oil cooled, 4 Stroke 2 Valve Single cylinder OHC
SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled, Fi
Engine Displacement
199.6 cc
197.75 cc
Max Power
18.1 PS @ 8500 rpm
Sport : 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm, Urban/ Rain : 17.32 PS @ 7800 rpm
Max Torque
16.15 Nm @ 6500 rpm
Sport : 17.25 Nm @ 7250 rpm, Urban/ Rain : 16.51 Nm @ 5750 rpm
Emission Type
66.5 mm
66 mm
57.5 mm
57.8 mm
No Of Cylinders
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
Fuel Type
Digital DC CDI Ignition System
Mapped ignition system
Compression Ratio

Brakes Front
Brakes Rear

Quarter Mile
18.72 secs @ 109.26 kmph
Braking (60-0 kmph)
17.60 mm
Braking (80-0 kmph)
32.04 mm
Braking (100-0 kmph)
55.22 mm
Mileage (City)
50.70 kmpl
Mileage (Highway)
42.58 kmpl
Braking 60-0 km/h
17.60 mm

Telescopic (37 mm Dia) with anti friction bush
Telescopic Forks with Preload Adjuster
Diamond Type
Double Cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame
7 step Rider-adjustable Monoshock
Mono Tube - Mono Shock

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-130/70-17
Front :-90/90-17 Rear :-130/70-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Radial Tyre
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)

2118*806*1089 mm^3
2050*790*1050 mm^3
1393 mm
1353 mm
2118 mm
2050 mm
Ground Clearance
178 mm
180 mm
806 mm
790 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
154 Kg
152 Kg
Tail Light
Front Brake Diameter
276 mm
270 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
220 mm
240 mm

Battery Type
Maintenance Free
Pilot Lamps
LED tail lights
Turn Signal Lamp

Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Adventure Tourer Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Kick and Self Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Pass Switch
Mobile Application
Trip Meter
Charging point
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Stepup Seat
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Oil Cooled
Oil Cooled
Mobile Connectivity


Do you own a Car or a

  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor

XPulse 200T Alternatives

Apache RTR 200 4V Alternatives

Sell Your Car in Best Price

Instant money transfer, RC Transfer, Home Inspection

COVID safety assured - Contactless experience in whole process

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is better RTR 200 ABS or Fz25? What is mileage of both?
  • As a owner of rtr 200 4v i am telling you why i chose rtr 200 over fz 25 and then i will tell you why you should opt for fz 25 so let's start with rtr's pros over fz's1.Exhaust note: exhaust note of both the bikes are music to the ear of a rider but in my personal opinion I think RTR's exhaust note is likely superior to that of FZ's 20 exhaust note2. handling characteristics: handling of bobber bikes is so good but RTR's handlingis slightly superior to that of FZ's handling due to the sporty nature of the bike3. suitability: as a short rider I prefer RTR's riding dynamics more than FZS because RTR footpegs is slightly closer to the seat than that of FZS foot pegs so it becomes specially comfortable for short riders while FZ is neutral to the the all size of riders4 pricing: as you know that RTR is is slightly cheaper than FZ and it fulfills my needs also so I preferred RTR over FZnow the points in which which FZ is ahead of RTR1. there is no replacement for displacement: yes it is true because when you will write FZ it will surely feel that it is 250 cc bike and when you will ride RTR then it will give feel of 200 cc bike that exactly it is so if you need more torquey engine more usable power than FZ is quite ahead2: engine refinement: both the bikes are very refined with negligible vibrations but when you're considering specifically for the refinement of the engine then Yamaha is is slightly ahead of TVS and this improves the fuel economy of the FZ i own Apache so I know that its mileage is slightly less than that of every despite of having a smaller engine and slightly less power it gives less mileage so if you love mileage FZ25 should be your pick3: suitability: as I have mentioned earlier that RTR is specially made for shorter riders and it doesn't fits well with the medium-sized rider and the taller riders but it is not the case with the FZ which suits well with all sizes of riders so if you are a rider on taller side FZ should be your pick4. value for money: in spite of RTR being cheaper it is the FZ that is more value for money because it gets bigger engine better mileage and it gets Fi and abs together in that price which is not the case with the RTR rs people because it's a vs model doesn't have Fi so you can not call it value for moneyfinal verdict: both the bikes are very good you cannot go wrong with either of the bikes now it boils down to your personal preference and some subjective opinion that which bike looks more more pleasing to you and which brand is your favourite and the main point is here that what is your budget thanks
  • Both bikes come with 5 gears. engine capacity is different though. I haven’t ridden FZ25. But FZ25 doesn’t comes with ABS and from the safety point of view RTR ABS is good. But few issues with RTR is its stock headlamp doesn’t have enough power for night view, though high beam has enough to see. It comes with Carb only with ABS. Carb seems to feel outdated in this 21st century. On the pros side, it has beautiful weight distribution, the bike feel perfectly balanced to manoeuvre in city traffic, catches 100kmph so sweetly and runs butter smooth. I’ve done 130kmph in my RTR 200 ABS. Instrument cluster has whole lot of information. You don’t need to watch wrist watch or take out your smartphone when you’re late for the office and stucked in the traffic. Clutch feels light (my friend who has Avenger Street 220 said he has got the feel and meaning of Slipper Clutch after riding my machine). FZ25 has refined engine with EFI. But it has ordinary instrument cluster, doesn’t comes with ABS. Bottom line: I would suggest you to wait till 2019 April, you’ll get lot of options to choose from. You’ll get all bikes with ABS and FI will also come in many bikes. Or else EFI will make its way in all bikes from 2020 to comply the BS6 norms. 2019 May also marks the production of BS6 engines from many brands. And if you can’t wait to rev the engine then you should buy RTR ABS as safely is more important than the refinement of EFI (RE Classic 350 the best selling motorcycle of the country still comes CV Carburettor, this has helped me to get my set of wheels). Have a safe ride. Cheers!!!
  • If you want better performance with comfort, go for apache. If you want looks and if you are a speed lover go with FZ.Apache plus points : Fully digital instrument cluster, exhaust sound, Riding posture, comfort, low maintenanceApache drawbacks : halogen headlight, chain noise, neutral gear indicator, tyre sizeFZ plus points : LED headlights, looks, power, broad tyres, instrument clusterFZ drawbacks : price, headlamp spread, relatively high maintenanceALL THE BEST !!! Keep Riding !!!
View All Answers
Q. Should i buy TVS Apache RTR 200 4V ABS or wait for MT-15?
  • See Apache is good for the city ride but don't expect the good milage.....but pick is good.....but take a test drive of the mt-15 so if u feel the bike comfortable and pick over all 360degree u have compare and then u buy
  • Rtr 2004v for race like dynamics...mt 15 is a naked designed for streets.soits up to you.but mt15 can do all which space can do
  • Apache is better than mt 15 and also low cost. It gives you slipper clutch and dual channel abs at Rs. 1.4L on road Kolkata. Where the ex-showroom price of mt 15 is Rs. 1.36 offering only single channel abs
View All Answers
Q. Which is good Apache RTR 200 4v or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Honda Hornet 2.0 is powered by a 184.4cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled, fuel-injected engine that makes 17.2PS of power at 8500rpm while the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V gets a 197.5cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled, engine with oil cooler
  • I would be using it for City commute and weekend highway ride . Can you please suggest one ??
View More Questions

Popular Bikes Comparison

  • Trending
  • Scooters
  • Sports
  • Cruisers
Compare Bikes