Hero XPulse 200 vs Yamaha FZ V3 Comparison
Hero XPulse 200 vs Yamaha FZ V3
Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 Price starts at Rs. 99,200 which is Rs. 700 costlier than Hero XPulse 200 priced at Rs. 98,500. The claimed mileage for the Hero XPulse 200 is 55 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 is 50 kmpl. In technical specifications, Hero XPulse 200 is powered by 199.6 cc engine where as Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 is powered by 149 cc engine. Hero XPulse 200 is available in 1 different colours while Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 comes with 1 colours. 74% users have chosen Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 over Hero Moto Corp XPulse 200 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Hero XPulse 200 vs Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
XPulse 200 vs FZ-Fi Version 3.0 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | XPulse 200 Fi | FZ-Fi Version 3.0 STD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.07 lakh | Rs. 99,200 |
| Engine Type | Air-cooled, 4 Stroke 2 Valve Single cylinder OHC | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.6 cc | 149 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 18.4 PS @ 8000 rpm | 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 5.13s | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | ... | 50 kmpl |
| Wheel Size | Front :-533.4 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Spoke | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | Air-cooled, 4 Stroke 2 Valve Single cylinder OHC | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.6 cc | 149 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 18.4 PS @ 8000 rpm | 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 17.1 Nm @ 6500 rpm | 12.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| Bore | 66.5 mm | 57.3 mm |
| Stroke | 57.5 mm | 57.9 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Digital DC CDI Ignition System | Transistor controlled ignition |
| Compression Ratio | 10:01 | 9.5:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 5 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 5.13s | ... |
| Quarter Mile | 19.50 s @ 104.74 kmph | ... |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 25.00m | ... |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 45.20m | ... |
| Mileage (City) | 46.40 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (Highway) | 42.75 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (Overall) | 55 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | ... | 50 kmpl |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 16.66s | ... |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 25.00m | ... |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic with Double DU Bush | Telescopic |
| Chassis | Diamond type | Diamond |
| Suspension-Rear | 10 step Rider-adjustable Monoshock | Swingarm |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/90-21 Rear :-120/80-18 | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/60-R17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-533.4 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tube | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Spoke | Alloy |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2223*850*1257 | 1990*780*1080 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1412 mm | 1330 mm |
| Length | 2223 mm | 1990 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 220 mm | 165 mm |
| Height | 1257 mm | 1080 mm |
| Seat Height | 823 mm | 790 mm |
| Width | 850 mm | 780 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 13 L | 12.8 L |
| Tail Light | LED | Bulb |
| Front Brake Diameter | 276 mm | ... |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 220 mm | ... |
Electricals
| Battery Type | MF | Sealed Type |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Adventure Tourer Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ... | |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Single | Split |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Charging point | Optional | |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ... | |
| Clock | Digital | |
| Stepup Seat | ... | |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Navigation | ... |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Similar Bike Comparisons
-
FZ-Fi Version 3.0Rs. 99,200vsFZ-Fi Version 3.0 vs FZ-S Fi Version 3.0FZ-S Fi Version 3.0Rs. 98,680
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is good to buy, FZ Fi V3 and FZ-S Fi V3?
- If you notice between the two there is not much of a difference because the dimensions, engine, performance, ergonomics everything is same. it all boils down to one thing, do you want a engine guard and body graphics or not. If you want then you can go for FZS Fi V3, if not FZ Fi V3.
- Basically there is no such great difference in both.in fz s u will have a engine guard and chrome garnish. and yes if you want maate colour gofor fz s and if u like glossy go for fz
- If you require better performance, you may opt for FZ FI V3 on the other hand, you may opt for FZ S FI V3, it you require better fuel efficiency. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
Q. Should I buy FZ S FI or TVS Apache RTR 160 4V?
- Go for fz v3. people are saying that the 4v is having super smooth engine but believe me I have ridden it and I feel the difference in riding my fz and 4v the 4v is having little bit more vibration than fz. even the looks of fz are attractive with fuel injection and single channel ABS in standard . GO FOR FZ . because it's YAMAHA
- If you want speed, pick up and sporty ride feel then go for Apache RTR 160 4V; but if you would want mileage, comfort and effective braking then you should go for FZS-FI.
- Between these two bikes, our pick will be TVS Apache RTR 160 4V as known for its quick handling dynamics and rev-happy engine, the TVS Apache is one fun-to-ride motorcycle in its class. Do take a test ride in order to judge your riding comfort.
Q. What is the difference between FZ-FI and FZ S FI?
- Practically if you look from a distance there is no difference between the two bikes. But if you notice closely you will see that the body graphics would be present in FZS Fi V3 which is not there in FZ Fi V3. Also a big difference is that there is engine guard present in FZS Fi V3 which is not there in FZ Fi V3. One more thing is that there is an optional feature for charging point for FZ V3 which is not there in FZS Fi V3, this is secondary.
- Powering the FZ Fi and the FZS Fi is the same 149cc, single-cylinder, fuel-injected engine found in the older bike. It continues to generate 13.2PS of power at 8000rpm and 12.8Nm of torque at 6000rpm, mated to a 5-speed gearbox. Read More: - 2019 Yamaha FZ Fi ABS & FZS Fi ABS: Top 5 Things You Need To Know: https://www.zigwheels.com/news-features/news/2019-yamaha-fz-fi-abs-fzs-fi-abs-top-5-things-you-need-to-know/32822/
- FZ FI gets CDI(Capacitor Discharge Ignition) system which offers better performance while FZ S FI comes with TCI(Transistor Controlled Ignition) system which results better mileage. Apart from it, there are some difference in their graphics and body design to.
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
