CFMoto 650NK vs Hyosung GT250R Comparison

CFMoto 650NK vs Hyosung GT250R

CFMoto 650NK Price starts at Rs. 3.99 lakh which is Rs. 60,400 costlier than Hyosung GT250R priced at Rs. 3.39 lakh. The claimed mileage for the CFMoto 650NK is 20.4 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Hyosung GT250R is 27 kmpl. In technical specifications, CFMoto 650NK is powered by 649.3 cc engine where as Hyosung GT250R is powered by 249 cc engine. CFMoto 650NK is available in 1 different colours while Hyosung GT250R comes with 3 colours. The Comparison CFMoto 650NK vs Hyosung GT250R can be described on the basis of price and specifications. Compare CFMoto 650NK vs Hyosung GT250R on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

Engine Type Liquid-cooled, 2-cylinder inline, 8-valve, DOHC 2-Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 8-Valve, Oil Cooled, DOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 649.3 cc 249 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 61.18 PS @ 9000 rpm 28.38 PS @ 10000 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm)
Bore 83 mm
Stroke 60 mm
No Of Cylinders 2 2
Drive Type Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 4 4
Fuel System
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Ignition ECU
Compression Ratio 11.3:1
Engine Immobilizer
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 6-speed 5 Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Braking Type
0-60 kmph (sec) 2.36s 4.1s
Quarter Mile
Braking (60-0 kmph) 17.21m
20-80 kmph (kickdown)
30-70 kmph (3rd gear)
40-80 kmph (4th gear)
Braking (80-0 kmph) 30.10m
Braking (100-0 kmph) 50.63m
Mileage (City) 20.39 kmpl
Mileage (Highway) 24.79 kmpl
Mileage (Overall)
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl 27 kmpl
0-100 kmph (sec) 5.18s
Top Speed (Km/h)
0-160 kmph
Braking 60-0 km/h 17.21m
Chassis Type
Suspension-Front Retractable Type Inverted Telescopic
Chassis Lightweight Frame
Suspension-Rear Cantilever Type Hydraulic Mono Suspension
Tyre Size Front :-120/70-17, Rear :-160/60-17 Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17
Wheel Size Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch
Tyre Make
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Radial Tyre Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Dry Weight
Length*Width*Height 2114*757*1100 2090*700*1130
Wheelbase(mm) 1415 mm 1435 mm
Length 2114 mm 2090 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 150 mm
Height 1100 mm 1130 mm
Seat Height 815 mm 830 mm
Width 757 mm 700 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 17 L 17 L
Kerb Weight
Total Weight
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter
Rear Brake Diameter
Battery Type
Charging Time
Motor Type
Motor Power
Fast Charging
Head Lamp
Projector head light
Pilot Lamps
LED tail lights
Seat Opening Switch
Boot Light
Turn Signal Lamp LED LED
Power Modes
Cruise Control
ABS Dual Channel no
Body Type Sports Naked Bikes Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Split Split
Pass Switch Yes Yes
Speedometer Digital Digital
Handle Type
Tachometer Analogue
Trip Meter Digital
Charging point
Average Fuel economy
Digital Fuel Indicator
Distance to Empty
Low Fuel Warning Lamp Yes Yes
External Fuel Filling
Stand Alarm
Low Battery Indicator
Stepup Seat
Low Oil Indicator
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
Passenger Backrest
Carry hook
Underseat storage
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Oil Cooled
Console Digital Analogue and Digital
Anti Theft Alarm
Shutter Lock
Odometer Digital Digital
Central Locking
Mobile Connectivity No
Service Due Indicator
Switchable ABS
Keyless Ignition
Standard Warranty (Years) 2
Standard Warranty (kilometers) 24000

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. What is the difference between apache rr310 and hyosung GT250R?
  • Hyosung GT250R is powered by 249cc V-twin motor that makes 28.3PS and 22Nm of torque. This is a torque-rich motor and powerful enough to propel the bike to a claimed top speed of 140kmph. While Apache RR 310 is the 312.2cc, liquid-cooled, single-cylinder engine that has been derived from the BMW G 310 R. While power and torque figures are the same. They are developed 200rpm earlier in the rev range. As a result, 34PS comes in at 9700rpm and 27.3 Nm of torque is produced at 7700rpm. TVS also claims a top speed of 160kmph and a 0-60kmph time of 2.93 seconds. Click on the link to compare: https://bit.ly/2C2AKWf