BMW G 310 R vs KTM Duke 200 Comparison
BMW G 310 R vs KTM Duke 200
BMW G 310 R Price starts at Rs. 2.99 lakh which is Rs. 1.37 lakh costlier than KTM 200 Duke priced at Rs. 1.62 lakh. The claimed mileage for the BMW G 310 R is 31.9 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for KTM 200 Duke is 35 kmpl. In technical specifications, BMW G 310 R is powered by 313 cc engine where as KTM 200 Duke is powered by 199.5 cc engine. BMW G 310 R is available in 1 different colours while KTM 200 Duke comes with 4 colours. 52% users have chosen BMW G 310 R over KTM 200 Duke in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare BMW G 310 R vs KTM 200 Duke on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
G 310 R vs 200 Duke Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | G 310 R ABS | 200 Duke BS6 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 2.99 lakh | Rs. 1.72 lakh |
| Engine Type | Single-Cylinder, 4-Valves, DOHC Engine | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 313 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 34 PS @ 9500 rpm | 25 PS @ 10,000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.07s | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17dia inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Cast Aluminium | Alloy |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | Single-Cylinder, 4-Valves, DOHC Engine | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 313 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 34 PS @ 9500 rpm | 25 PS @ 10,000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 28 Nm @ 7500 rpm | 19.3 Nm @ 8000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs6 |
| Bore | 80 mm | 72 mm |
| Stroke | 62.1 mm | 49 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Digital Ignition | |
| Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 11.3:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 6 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.07s | |
| Quarter Mile | 15.58 s @ 134.99 kmph | |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 18.78m | |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 32.45m | |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | 50.61m | |
| Mileage (City) | 31.86 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Highway) | 37 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Overall) | 35 kmpl | |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 7.47s | |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 18.78m |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Upside down fork | WP-USD Ø 43 mm |
| Chassis | Tubular spaceframe | Split Steel Trellis Frame |
| Suspension-Rear | Cast aluminium dual swing arm, central spring strut, spring pre-load adjustable | WP-Monoshock |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-110/70-R17, Rear :- 150/60-R17 | Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17dia inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | Yes |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Cast Aluminium | Alloy |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | 150.3 kg | |
| Length*Width*Height | 2005*820*1080 | 2050*730*810 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1374 mm | 1367 mm |
| Length | 2005 mm | 2050 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 170 mm | |
| Height | 1080 mm | 810 mm |
| Seat Height | 785 mm | 810 mm |
| Width | 820 mm | 730 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 11 L | 13.5 L |
| Total Weight | 345 kg | |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 240 mm | 230 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | MF | |
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | LED |
| Alternator | 308 W |
Features
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Single | Split |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Tachometer | Digital | |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Average Fuel economy | ||
| Distance to Empty | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | |
| Clock | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | Yes | |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | Yes | |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Passenger Backrest | ||
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | Yes | |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is good to buy between Pulsar RS 200 and KT M Duke 200
- Firstly, the character of both bikes are different from each other.. The DUKE 200 is high revving motor and has hell lot of power and concentrated at low end you end up falling and loving instantly, but the problem is as it was concentrated at low end there is no power left at topend and struggles to stay at triple digits speed and to cruise but in city you'll have hell lot of fun. The quality is good & maintenance is on higher side compared to RS 200..When comes to RS200 it is butter smooth and power delivery is linear and topend is high compared to duke 200 because of it's long gear ratios and when comes to quality the panels and plastics of RS200 isn't that great they vibrate a lot and endup rattling after few days and The maintenance is on cheaper side and costs half the duke 200 maintenance.
- If you want quick acceleration,much lighter weight , looks and want to do stunts then go for duke . But if you want sports bike like feel , good mileage of around 32 -35 kmpl , better top speed of 155kmph , soothing sound , ABS and all this at less price then Go for RS200 . I own RS200 now for 3 years . No problem at all .
- Firstly the character and tuning is different from each other.. The Duke 200 is a high revving engine with lots of power at low end and instantly you'll fall in love but u
Q. Which should be preferred FZ25 vs KTM 200 - Duke 200?
- If you need something fun... Reliable and premium go for Duke... If you re lookin for daily commute and leisure go for the fz.
- Fz 25 will be best every aspects but if u need initial pick up and aggressive riding style you should go for duke 200
- Most valuable and fantastic blog. I really appreciate your work which you have done about KTM 200 DUKE, many thanks and keep it up.KTM 200 DUKE
Q. Which would win KTM RC 200 VS KTM 200 Duke?
- Ever since its debut, the KTM 200 Duke has been the benchmark bike of its segment and still remains so. If you’re looking for a bike that offers great acceleration, loves to corner and has a hooligan nature, the 200 Duke is the bike for you and a great option for someone entering the world of performance bikes. The only grouse we have with the KTM 200 Duke is its super stiff ride quality and the fact that ABS isn’t offered even as an option. On the other hand, the RC 200 has set the bar quite high for the entry-level sports bike segment. The committed ergonomics might not be everyone’s cup of tea but if you are looking for cornering dynamics with an added dose of power but are on a budget, your search ends here. We would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
- Actually they're built on same platform but different in characters duke is of naked street bike and can be used day to day use with comfort because of the upright sitting posture,Coming to rc the name RC stands for Road /Competition i.e made for road and track equally but i say it is completely best suited for track /track days the clip on handle bars with lower seat on RC gives you discomfort on rough roads or if you ride for longer hours even on uneven roads u can feel every bit of it... So there is no WIN OR LOSE both are best in there own ways
- No difference as their topspeed is limited till 136kmph as far as drag race is concerned.KTM RC is known for trackdays.Duke is basically jack of all trades.Also do a test ride as ergonamically Duke is better, but still everyone has different taste you may like aggressive stance of rc so test ride will be great
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
