Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Yamaha FZ 25 Comparison
Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Yamaha FZ 25
Yamaha FZ 25 Price starts at Rs. To Be Announced which is Rs. To Be Announced costlier than Bajaj Pulsar RS200 priced at Rs. To Be Announced. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is NA where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha FZ 25 is NA. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine where as Yamaha FZ 25 is powered by 249 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is available in 7 different colours while Yamaha FZ 25 comes with 1 colours. 61% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar RS200 over Yamaha FZ 25 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Yamaha FZ 25 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Pulsar RS200 vs FZ 25 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Pulsar RS200 Dual ABS | FZ 25 Moto GP Limited Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.43 lakh | Rs. 1.37 lakh |
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4-Valve, Triple Spark, DTS-i Engine, liquid Cooled | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 249 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm | 20.9 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ... | 3.77s |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 35 kmpl | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4-Valve, Triple Spark, DTS-i Engine, liquid Cooled | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 249 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm | 20.9 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 18.6 Nm @ 8000 rpm | 20 Nm @ 6000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| Bore | ... | 74 mm |
| Stroke | ... | 58 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Compression Ratio | 11.2:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 5-speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ... | 3.77s |
| Quarter Mile | ... | 17.32s@117.22 kmph |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | ... | 2.89s, 15.85mm |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | ... | 3.61s, 30.02mm |
| Mileage (City) | ... | 45.6 kmpl |
| Mileage (Highway) | ... | 31.17 kmpl |
| Mileage (Overall) | ... | 35 kmpl |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 35 kmpl | ... |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | ... | 10.33s |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | ... | 2.89s, 15.85mm |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic With Anti Friction Bush | Telescopic Fork |
| Chassis | Perimeter Frame | Daimond |
| Suspension-Rear | Nitrox Mono Shock Absorber with Canister | Swingarm (Monocross) |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-130/70-17 | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/70-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ... | |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 25 psi | 25 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 1999*765*1114 | 2015*770*1075 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1345 mm | 1360 mm |
| Length | 1999 mm | 2015 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 157 mm | 160 mm |
| Height | 1114 mm | 1075 mm |
| Seat Height | 800 mm | 795 mm |
| Width | 765 mm | 770 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 13 L | 14 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 300 mm | 282 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 220 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | DC MF | ... |
| Pilot Lamps | ... | |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ... | |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Tachometer | Analogue | ... |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | Digital | |
| Low Battery Indicator | ... | |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | Dual Projector | ... |
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Mobile Connectivity | ... |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | ... |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 24000 | ... |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. I am very much confused between Pulsar RS200 and FZ 25, both have ABS version in 2019. FZ has best mid-range
torque and mileage wise Fz is better than RS200 but on top end RS200 performs better.
- It’s a great comparison but if you need a better mileage I’m sure that RS can give more than FZ25 id you maintain ur speedometer below 80. RS also have punchy and smooth mid range remember its from KTm 200cc engines. FZ is also a good option but considering the price point I don’t think it worth
- Look the engine which fz has a very torqy engine (20 bhp) where as RS has a engine which produces proper torque only after 7500 rpm due to which u will have to face difficulty in city rides (start stops ) and mountain rides
- Go for RS200 BRO DUAL CHANNEL ABS WITH BS4 ENGINE
Q. Which is best pulsar ns200 or rs200?
- The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is a comfortable city bike with plenty of grunt and agility for a quick race off the traffic lights and to tackle some twisties as well. But the engine feels too strained out on the highway. Also, ergonomically, with the high-set footpegs it’s a tight spot for someone taller than 5 feet 10 inches. Even the brakes fail to inspire confidence under hard braking. Luckily though, TVS does offer ABS as an option. But then, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 also gets ABS, a single-channel unit. Apart from that, the Bajaj is also a more well rounded motorcycle that does everything just right. The ride quality too is better on the Bajaj. So, if your daily riding consists more of city commutes, the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is the way to go. But if you are looking to ride your bike out on the highway as well, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a more potent tool to opt for.
- The Pulsar RS200 has proved to be a masterstroke for the Chakan-based manufacturer. It is a well-rounded package with a good balance of performance and handling without compromising on comfort. What sweetens the deal further is the added safety net of ABS, the fresh design update, and the competitive pricing. On the other hand, Pulsar NS200 comes across as a well-rounded package that can efficiently take on almost every kind of task required. Be it charging into corners, riding flat out on highways or manage daily chores with ease, the Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 makes a strong case for itself. It offers good grunt, stopping power and well-balanced ergonomics which makes it an all-rounder. Click on the link to compare them: https://bit.ly/2zT6uqV
- RS 200 makes very high frequency vibration but it looks super. RS 200's engine is better than NS200 . I'm don't recommend to buy NS or RS. If your budget is low than you can buy it. I'm recommend to buy Duke 200 or Dominar 400 Both are best for tour and very comfortable. Upgrade your budget up-to 2lacks and buy DUKE 200 or DOMINAR 400
Q. Is this bike worth to buy? Please help me to know any pros. and cons. about this bike or any other bike in this segment. - FZ 25?
- Bro. I've owned this bike for around 2 years now. The bike is great and everything. Its good a good and peppy engine. Great milage considering the power it has. Extremely comfortable seats. The main downside i came across was the weak headlight unit. You could very well get an aftermarket LED fitted on it or go for fog lamps. 6th gear is a problem only when the bike is pushed hard. In normal city driving and highway runs you won't need a 6th gear. The service and maintenance cost of the bike is very less as with all Yamaha bikes. Also it is ultra reliable and won't need too many services
- Hello. The 2019 model gets dual channel Abs.
- Pros- Good pickup, Nice accelerating, Good for both city and highway driving. mileage in best with 250 cc segment and it's almost low budget bike in 250 cc also. service center available everywhere cons- Air cooled Bike, little problem in engine hitting specially on long drive and on summer season. Old and 1st model don't have ABS that's a badluck. silencer got rusted with more heat power from engine and even after repeated paint by the showroom still its again looks like iron parts. but still overall it's amazing bike
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
