Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Yamaha FZ 25 Comparison

Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Yamaha FZ 25

Yamaha FZ 25 Price starts at Rs. To Be Announced which is Rs. To Be Announced costlier than Bajaj Pulsar RS200 priced at Rs. To Be Announced. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is NA where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha FZ 25 is NA. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine where as Yamaha FZ 25 is powered by 249 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is available in 7 different colours while Yamaha FZ 25 comes with 1 colours. 61% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar RS200 over Yamaha FZ 25 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Yamaha FZ 25 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

Pulsar RS200 vs FZ 25 Specs Overview

Specs/Features Pulsar RS200 Dual ABSFZ 25 Moto GP Limited Edition
Price Rs. 1.43 lakh Rs. 1.37 lakh
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4-Valve, Triple Spark, DTS-i Engine, liquid Cooled Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 199.5 cc 249 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm 20.9 PS @ 8000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
0-60 kmph (sec) ... 3.77s
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl 35 kmpl ...
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4-Valve, Triple Spark, DTS-i Engine, liquid Cooled Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 199.5 cc 249 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm 20.9 PS @ 8000 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm) 18.6 Nm @ 8000 rpm 20 Nm @ 6000 rpm
Emission Type bs4 bs4
Bore ... 74 mm
Stroke ... 58 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 4 2
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Compression Ratio 11.2:1 9.8:1
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 6 Speed 5-speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
0-60 kmph (sec) ... 3.77s
Quarter Mile ... 17.32s@117.22 kmph
Braking (60-0 kmph) ... 2.89s, 15.85mm
Braking (80-0 kmph) ... 3.61s, 30.02mm
Mileage (City) ... 45.6 kmpl
Mileage (Highway) ... 31.17 kmpl
Mileage (Overall) ... 35 kmpl
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl 35 kmpl ...
0-100 kmph (sec) ... 10.33s
Braking 60-0 km/h ... 2.89s, 15.85mm
Suspension-Front Telescopic With Anti Friction Bush Telescopic Fork
Chassis Perimeter Frame Daimond
Suspension-Rear Nitrox Mono Shock Absorber with Canister Swingarm (Monocross)
Tyre Size Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-130/70-17 Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/70-17
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Radial Tyre ...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) 25 psi 25 psi
Length*Width*Height 1999*765*1114 2015*770*1075
Wheelbase(mm) 1345 mm 1360 mm
Length 1999 mm 2015 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 157 mm 160 mm
Height 1114 mm 1075 mm
Seat Height 800 mm 795 mm
Width 765 mm 770 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 13 L 14 L
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 300 mm 282 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 230 mm 220 mm
Battery Type DC MF ...
Pilot Lamps ...
LED tail lights
Turn Signal Lamp LED Bulb
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Body Type Sports Bikes Sports Naked Bikes
Body Graphics ...
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Split Split
Pass Switch
Speedometer Digital Digital
Tachometer Analogue ...
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock Digital
Low Battery Indicator ...
Stepup Seat
Low Oil Indicator
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights Dual Projector ...
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Air Cooled
Console Digital Digital
Odometer Digital Digital
Mobile Connectivity ...
Standard Warranty (Years) 2 ...
Standard Warranty (kilometers) 24000 ...

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. I am very much confused between Pulsar RS200 and FZ 25, both have ABS version in 2019. FZ has best mid-range torque and mileage wise Fz is better than RS200 but on top end RS200 performs better.
  • It’s a great comparison but if you need a better mileage I’m sure that RS can give more than FZ25 id you maintain ur speedometer below 80. RS also have punchy and smooth mid range remember its from KTm 200cc engines. FZ is also a good option but considering the price point I don’t think it worth
  • Look the engine which fz has a very torqy engine (20 bhp) where as RS has a engine which produces proper torque only after 7500 rpm due to which u will have to face difficulty in city rides (start stops ) and mountain rides
View All Answers
Q. Which is best pulsar ns200 or rs200?
  • The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is a comfortable city bike with plenty of grunt and agility for a quick race off the traffic lights and to tackle some twisties as well. But the engine feels too strained out on the highway. Also, ergonomically, with the high-set footpegs it’s a tight spot for someone taller than 5 feet 10 inches. Even the brakes fail to inspire confidence under hard braking. Luckily though, TVS does offer ABS as an option. But then, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 also gets ABS, a single-channel unit. Apart from that, the Bajaj is also a more well rounded motorcycle that does everything just right. The ride quality too is better on the Bajaj. So, if your daily riding consists more of city commutes, the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is the way to go. But if you are looking to ride your bike out on the highway as well, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a more potent tool to opt for.
  • The Pulsar RS200 has proved to be a masterstroke for the Chakan-based manufacturer. It is a well-rounded package with a good balance of performance and handling without compromising on comfort. What sweetens the deal further is the added safety net of ABS, the fresh design update, and the competitive pricing. On the other hand, Pulsar NS200 comes across as a well-rounded package that can efficiently take on almost every kind of task required. Be it charging into corners, riding flat out on highways or manage daily chores with ease, the Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 makes a strong case for itself. It offers good grunt, stopping power and well-balanced ergonomics which makes it an all-rounder. Click on the link to compare them: https://bit.ly/2zT6uqV
  • RS 200 makes very high frequency vibration but it looks super. RS 200's engine is better than NS200 . I'm don't recommend to buy NS or RS. If your budget is low than you can buy it. I'm recommend to buy Duke 200 or Dominar 400 Both are best for tour and very comfortable. Upgrade your budget up-to 2lacks and buy DUKE 200 or DOMINAR 400
View All Answers
Q. Is this bike worth to buy? Please help me to know any pros. and cons. about this bike or any other bike in this segment. - FZ 25?
  • Bro. I've owned this bike for around 2 years now. The bike is great and everything. Its good a good and peppy engine. Great milage considering the power it has. Extremely comfortable seats. The main downside i came across was the weak headlight unit. You could very well get an aftermarket LED fitted on it or go for fog lamps. 6th gear is a problem only when the bike is pushed hard. In normal city driving and highway runs you won't need a 6th gear. The service and maintenance cost of the bike is very less as with all Yamaha bikes. Also it is ultra reliable and won't need too many services
  • Hello. The 2019 model gets dual channel Abs.
  • Pros- Good pickup, Nice accelerating, Good for both city and highway driving. mileage in best with 250 cc segment and it's almost low budget bike in 250 cc also. service center available everywhere cons- Air cooled Bike, little problem in engine hitting specially on long drive and on summer season. Old and 1st model don't have ABS that's a badluck. silencer got rusted with more heat power from engine and even after repeated paint by the showroom still its again looks like iron parts. but still overall it's amazing bike
View All Answers
View More Questions