Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Yamaha FZ 25 Comparison
Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Yamaha FZ 25
Any question on your mind about which bike to buy? Compare Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Yamaha FZ 25 on the basis of price, specifications & other features. Bajaj Pulsar RS200 Price starts from Rs. 1.26 lakh and Yamaha FZ 25 Price starts from Rs. 1.19 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is 35 kmpl and for the Yamaha FZ 25 is 45.6 kmpl. Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is available in 7 different colours while Yamaha FZ 25 comes with 1 colours. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine whereas Yamaha FZ 25 is powered by 249 cc engine.
Engine
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4-Valve, Triple Spark, DTS-i Engine | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 249 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm | 20.9 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 18.6 Nm @ 8000 rpm | 20 Nm @ 6000 rpm |
| Bore | 72 mm | 74 mm |
| Stroke | 49 mm | 58 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valves (per cylinder) | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel System | Fuel Injection | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Inductive DC Ignition System | TCI |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 5-speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Suspension
| Chassis Type | Perimeter Frame | Daimond |
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic With Anti Friction Bush | Telescopic Fork |
| Suspension-Rear | Nitrox Mono Shock Absorber with Canister | Swingarm (Monocross) |
Tyres
| Tyre Size (Front) | 100/80-17 | 100/80-17 |
| Tyre Size (Rear) | 130/70-17 | 140/70-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch |
| Tyre Make | ||
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 1999*765*1114 | 2015*770*1075 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1355 mm | 1360 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 157 mm | 160 mm |
| Seat Height | 800 mm | 795 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 13 L | 14 L |
| Kerb Weight | 164 Kg | 148 Kg |
Electricals
| Battery | 12 V | |
| Head Lamp | Low and High Beam Projector | LED |
| Projector head light | Dual Projector | |
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights |
Features
| ABS | no | no |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Tachometer | Analogue | Digital |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Average Fuel economy | yes | |
| Digital Fuel Indicator | yes | yes |
| Distance to Empty | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | |
| Clock | ||
| Stand Alarm | Yes | |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Passenger Backrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 24000 |
Similar Bike Comparisons
Recently Asked User Questions
Muhammad_Sadiq_Msr has asked a question about Pulsar RS200
Q.
Which one has best performance standard or ABS??
View 1 more answer
Samrat_Ghosh has asked a question about Pulsar RS200
Q.
Which is more attractive, comfortable and afforable for daily use?? Pulsar RS200 or ROYAL ENFIELD classic 350??
Amom_Imocha has asked a question about FZ 25
Q.
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 (ABS) vs Yamaha FZ25 , which one is better (Daily uses around 60km in delhi NCR, 5 days in a week)?
