Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs TVS Apache RR 310 Comparison
Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs TVS Apache RR 310
TVS Apache RR 310 Price starts at Rs. 2.28 lakh which is Rs. 86,067 costlier than Bajaj Pulsar RS200 priced at Rs. 1.42 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is 35 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for TVS Apache RR 310 is 31 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine where as TVS Apache RR 310 is powered by 312.2 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is available in 7 different colours while TVS Apache RR 310 comes with 1 colours. 56% users have chosen TVS Apache RR 310 over Bajaj Pulsar RS200 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs TVS Apache RR 310 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Engine
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4-Valve, Triple Spark, DTS-i Engine, liquid Cooled | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, Reverse Inclined DOHC, SI Engine |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 312.2 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm | 34 PS @ 9700 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | ||
| Bore | 80 mm | |
| Stroke | 62.1 mm | |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel System | ||
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Dynamically controlled integrated high energy ignition system | |
| Compression Ratio | 11.2:1 | 10.9:1 |
| Engine Immobilizer | ||
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 6 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| Braking Type |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 2.93s | |
| Quarter Mile | 15.20 s @ 137.33 kmph | |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 20.69m | |
| 20-80 kmph (kickdown) | ||
| 30-70 kmph (3rd gear) | ||
| 40-80 kmph (4th gear) | ||
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 37.49m | |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | ||
| Mileage (City) | 31 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Highway) | 35.9 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Overall) | 35 kmpl | |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 35 kmpl | |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 7.17s | |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | ||
| 0-160 kmph | ||
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 20.69m |
Suspension
| Chassis Type | ||
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic With Anti Friction Bush | Inverted Cartridge Telescopic Fork |
| Chassis | Perimeter Frame | Trellis frame, split chassis |
| Suspension-Rear | Nitrox Mono Shock Absorber with Canister | Two Arm Aluminium Die-Cast Swingarm, Mono Tube, Floating Piston Gas Assisted Shock Absorber |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-130/70-17 | Front :-110/70-R17 Rear :-150/60-R17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-17 inch Rear :-17 inch |
| Tyre Make | ||
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | Yes |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 25 psi | 32 psi |
| Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion) |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | ||
| Length*Width*Height | 1999*765*1114 | 2001*786*1135 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1345 mm | 1365 mm |
| Length | 1999 mm | 2001 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 157 mm | 180 mm |
| Height | 1114 mm | 1135 mm |
| Seat Height | 800 mm | 810 mm |
| Width | 765 mm | 786 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 13 L | 11 L |
| Kerb Weight | ||
| Total Weight | ||
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 240 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | DC MF | Maintenance Free |
| Charging Time | ||
| Motor Type | ||
| Motor Power | ||
| Fast Charging | ||
| Battery | ||
| Range | ||
| Head Lamp | ||
| Projector head light | ||
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights | ||
| Seat Opening Switch | ||
| Boot Light | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | LED |
| Alternator | ||
| Power Modes |
Features
| Cruise Control | ||
| ABS | Single Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Bikes | Sports Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Handle Type | Two Piece Forged Handle Bar | |
| Tachometer | Analogue | |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Charging point | ||
| Average Fuel economy | ||
| Digital Fuel Indicator | ||
| Distance to Empty | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | Yes |
| External Fuel Filling | ||
| Clock | Digital | |
| Stand Alarm | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | Yes | |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | Dual Projector | LED Projector |
| Passenger Backrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage | ||
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Analogue and Digital | Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | ||
| Shutter Lock | ||
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Central Locking | ||
| Navigation | ||
| Mobile Connectivity | No | |
| EBS | ||
| Service Due Indicator | ||
| Switchable ABS | ||
| DRLs | ||
| Keyless Ignition |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 24000 |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is best pulsar ns200 or rs200?
- The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is a comfortable city bike with plenty of grunt and agility for a quick race off the traffic lights and to tackle some twisties as well. But the engine feels too strained out on the highway. Also, ergonomically, with the high-set footpegs it’s a tight spot for someone taller than 5 feet 10 inches. Even the brakes fail to inspire confidence under hard braking. Luckily though, TVS does offer ABS as an option. But then, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 also gets ABS, a single-channel unit. Apart from that, the Bajaj is also a more well rounded motorcycle that does everything just right. The ride quality too is better on the Bajaj. So, if your daily riding consists more of city commutes, the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is the way to go. But if you are looking to ride your bike out on the highway as well, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a more potent tool to opt for.
- The Pulsar RS200 has proved to be a masterstroke for the Chakan-based manufacturer. It is a well-rounded package with a good balance of performance and handling without compromising on comfort. What sweetens the deal further is the added safety net of ABS, the fresh design update, and the competitive pricing. On the other hand, Pulsar NS200 comes across as a well-rounded package that can efficiently take on almost every kind of task required. Be it charging into corners, riding flat out on highways or manage daily chores with ease, the Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 makes a strong case for itself. It offers good grunt, stopping power and well-balanced ergonomics which makes it an all-rounder. Click on the link to compare them: https://bit.ly/2zT6uqV
- RS 200 makes very high frequency vibration but it looks super. RS 200's engine is better than NS200 . I'm don't recommend to buy NS or RS. If your budget is low than you can buy it. I'm recommend to buy Duke 200 or Dominar 400 Both are best for tour and very comfortable. Upgrade your budget up-to 2lacks and buy DUKE 200 or DOMINAR 400
Q. Which is better between Dominar 400 and Apache RR 310
- Here are the points to consider:1. comfortApache 3/5domi 4/52. looks Apache 5/5domi 4/53. overall handlingApache 4/5domi 3/54. value for money Apache 4/5domi 4/55. after sales cost:Apache 2/5domi 4/56. spares price:Apache 2/5domi 4/57. parts availability:apache 3/5domi 4/58. local mechanics availability (for minor issues like chain lock, gear lever, etc)Apache 3/5domi 4/5in the end, ride both motorcycles and decide.both are of different budget bikes, and both has different characteristics.If touring is priority,then dominar makes more sense, touring below 500 kms a day then Apache is also good. people have done ladakh on Apache too, depends on rider fitness and skills.I would choose Apache mainly for my riding style.
- It's depend on you both bike performance are same but approx 60K price difference is there. Build quality of RR310 is better than Dominar 400. you can comfortably go on long tour with pillion in Dominar 400 but RR 310 is sports kind of bike so it is not suitable for pillion. if you are looking for good bike in decent price tag and comfortable for both rider and pillion then go for Dominar 400. if you are looking for sport kind of good looking bike and you don't care about price and pillion rider as well then go for RR310 choice is your.
- Both are better in their own segment.One is a complete tourer and the other is a sports tourer.So the best tourer is Dominor and the best sports tourer is RR.According to your need, you can choose one. But if you are into the lifestyle and touring then I would prefer RR.Whenever I take RR on to road I will always find people staring at my bike.So the decision is yours.
Q. Which is better between KTM RC390 & APACHE RR 310?
- Apache RR 310, despite being designed as a track focussed bike, is quite usable in the city thanks to its torquey and tractable motor. It offers a good balance between ride and handling as well. While brakes lack initial feel, they offer good bite. Another issue is vibrations around the 6000rpm range, which TVS has reduced to a fair degree. It is a good option to the focussed KTM RC 390, trading a bit of performance for everyday usability. KTM 390 Duke has always come across as a value for money product and the new variant takes the VFM quotient a notch up as it looks a lot more irresistible now. It gets an LED headlight unit and colour display that we like a lot and also handles beautifully with its aptly tuned suspension setup. Also, while it may not be as quick as the earlier 390, it certainly is a lot more refined. Between the TNT 300 and the KTM 390 Duke, the Benelli comes across as a motorcycle for people looking for a more relaxed way of commuting. The 390 Duke on the other hand is a wild beast and is meant for a lot more experienced riders and thrill seekers. Though, we would suggest you to take a test ride in order to pick one.
- The Apache RR 310, despite being designed as a track focussed bike, is quite usable in the city thanks to its torquey and tractable motor. It offers a good balance between ride and handling as well. While brakes lack initial feel, they offer good bite. Another issue is vibrations around the 6000rpm range, which TVS has reduced to a fair degree. While the KTM RC 390 has a upper hand in terms of power and is priced higher than the Apache RR 310, it packs in a lot more punch packed with more tech and is also a pure track-focused machine. It has remained a go-to option for riders looking for a dedicated track tool owing to its ergonomics, suspension setup and handling characteristics. Moreover, we would suggest you take a test ride in order to check riding comfort. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://bit.ly/2jv2aXQ
- KTM's RC 390 is definitely the best performer because both power and torque outputs of the RC are higher than the RR310. However, you would be in trouble if you buy an RC390 for daily commute or long rides. The heat dissipation system in the RC is too bad to handle in the regular daily city traffic and the RC 's committed riding posture and the fuel tank capacity are a big negative if you are buying one for long rides. Apache RR310 will be the best performer for regular city rides and long rides while the RC will be the top performer if you are a track rider.