Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs KTM RC 200 Comparison
Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs KTM RC 200
KTM RC 200 Price starts at Rs. 1.91 lakh which is Rs. 48,697 costlier than Bajaj Pulsar RS200 priced at Rs. 1.42 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is 35 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for KTM RC 200 is 32 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine where as KTM RC 200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is available in 7 different colours while KTM RC 200 comes with 2 colours. 58% users have chosen KTM RC 200 over Bajaj Pulsar RS200 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs KTM RC 200 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Engine
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4-Valve, Triple Spark, DTS-i Engine, liquid Cooled | 1-Cylinder, 4-Stroke, DOHC Engine |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm | 25.83 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 18.6 Nm @ 8000 rpm | 19.5 Nm @ 8000 rpm |
| Bore | 72 mm | |
| Stroke | 49 mm | |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel System | ||
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment | |
| Compression Ratio | 11.2:1 | 14.5:1 |
| Engine Immobilizer | ||
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 6 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| Braking Type |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ||
| Quarter Mile | ||
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | ||
| 20-80 kmph (kickdown) | ||
| 30-70 kmph (3rd gear) | ||
| 40-80 kmph (4th gear) | ||
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | ||
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | ||
| Mileage (City) | ||
| Mileage (Highway) | ||
| Mileage (Overall) | 32 kmpl | |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 35 kmpl | |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | ||
| Top Speed (Km/h) | ||
| 0-160 kmph | ||
| Braking 60-0 km/h |
Suspension
| Chassis Type | ||
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic With Anti Friction Bush | WP Upside-Down Fork Ø 43 mm |
| Chassis | Perimeter Frame | Steel Trellis Frame, Powder Coated |
| Suspension-Rear | Nitrox Mono Shock Absorber with Canister | WP Monoshock |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-130/70-17 | Front :-110/70 - 17, Rear :-150/60 - 17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch |
| Tyre Make | ||
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | Yes |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 25 psi | 29 psi |
| Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion) |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | 153 kg | |
| Length*Width*Height | 1999*765*1114 | 1978*688*1098 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1345 mm | 1340 mm |
| Length | 1999 mm | 1978 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 157 mm | 178.5 mm |
| Height | 1114 mm | 1098 mm |
| Seat Height | 800 mm | 835 mm |
| Width | 765 mm | 688 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 13 L | 9.5 L |
| Kerb Weight | ||
| Total Weight | ||
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 230 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | DC MF | Maintenance Free |
| Charging Time | ||
| Motor Type | ||
| Motor Power | ||
| Fast Charging | ||
| Battery | ||
| Range | ||
| Head Lamp | ||
| Projector head light | ||
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights | ||
| Seat Opening Switch | ||
| Boot Light | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | LED |
| Alternator | ||
| Power Modes |
Features
| Cruise Control | ||
| ABS | Single Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Bikes | Sports Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Handle Type | ||
| Tachometer | Analogue | |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Charging point | ||
| Average Fuel economy | ||
| Digital Fuel Indicator | ||
| Distance to Empty | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | Yes |
| External Fuel Filling | ||
| Clock | ||
| Stand Alarm | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | Dual Projector | |
| Passenger Backrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage | ||
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Analogue and Digital | Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | ||
| Shutter Lock | ||
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Central Locking | ||
| Navigation | ||
| Mobile Connectivity | No | No |
| EBS | ||
| Service Due Indicator | ||
| Switchable ABS | ||
| DRLs | ||
| Keyless Ignition |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | 2 |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 24000 | 30000 |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Is it fast then KTM RC 200?
- Yes it is...!
- Yes it is!!
- Only at top speed . Acceleration wise RC wins but comparable ni h .... 50k ka fark b h dono m .
Q. Can Bajaj Pulsar RS200 beat RC200?
- Absolutely after reaching 137kmph you have to be patient because the cutoff in ktm 200 will be in 137kmph.. but the top speed of RS is 154kmph.. but on the initial gears RC will throw it's dusts
- No not at all rs200 initial punch is better than rc200 because i have both bikes and i personally like rs200 more and feel initial punch of rs200 is better than rc
- Yes, when you are go for a drag race at the top end RS200 can beat RC200, but at the initial stage RC200 will have the lead.
Q. What's the cost of maintenance of rc 200 compared to rs 200?
- Very less of rs 200 campared to rc 200 First service of RS200 = 800 First service of RC200= 2745
- RS 200 maintenance cost is very low, than RC. And i think it is lowest among all its competitors.
- 30%above
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
