×

Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs KTM RC 200 Comparison

Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs KTM RC 200

KTM RC 200 Price starts at Rs. 1.91 lakh which is Rs. 82,303 costlier than Bajaj Pulsar 220 F priced at Rs. 1.08 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is 40 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for KTM RC 200 is 32 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is powered by 220 cc engine where as KTM RC 200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is available in 7 different colours while KTM RC 200 comes with 2 colours. 50% users have chosen KTM RC 200 over Bajaj Pulsar 220 F in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs KTM RC 200 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

Pulsar 220 F vs RC 200 Specs Overview

Specs/Features Pulsar 220 F ABSRC 200 BS6
Price Rs. 1.08 lakh Rs. 1.97 lakh
Engine Type 4-stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSIV Compliant, DTS-I Engine, Oil cooled Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 220 cc 199.5 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 20.93 PS @ 8500 rpm 25 PS @ 10000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
0-60 kmph (sec) 3.9s ...
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl 40 kmpl ...
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Single Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Engine Type 4-stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSIV Compliant, DTS-I Engine, Oil cooled Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC
Engine Displacement (CC) 220 cc 199.5 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 20.93 PS @ 8500 rpm 25 PS @ 10000 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm) 18.55 Nm @ 7000 rpm 19.2 Nm @ 8000 rpm
Emission Type bs4 bs6
Bore ... 72 mm
Stroke ... 49 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 2 4
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Ignition Digital Twin Spark Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment
Compression Ratio 9.5:1 14.5:1
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 5 Speed 6 Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
0-60 kmph (sec) 3.9s ...
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl 40 kmpl ...
Suspension-Front Telescopic With Anti - Friction Bush WP-USD Ø 43 mm
Chassis ... Steel Trellis Frame
Suspension-Rear 5 Way Adjustable Nitrox Shock Absorber WP Monoshock
Tyre Size Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-120/80-17 Front :-110/70 - 17, Rear :-150/60 - 17
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) 28 psi ...
Dry Weight ... 154.3 kg
Length*Width*Height 2035*750*1165 1978*688*1098
Wheelbase(mm) 1350 mm 1340 mm
Length 2035 mm 1978 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 165 mm 178.5 mm
Height 1165 mm 1098 mm
Seat Height 795 mm 835 mm
Width 750 mm 688 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 15 L 9.5 L
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 260 mm 300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 230 mm 230 mm
Battery Type Full DC ...
LED tail lights
Turn Signal Lamp Bulb LED
ABS Single Channel Dual Channel
Body Type Sports Bikes Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Split Split
Pass Switch
Speedometer Digital Digital
Tachometer Analogue ...
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Average Fuel economy ...
Distance to Empty ...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Stepup Seat ...
Low Oil Indicator
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
Underseat storage ...
Cooling System Oil Cooled Liquid Cooled
Console Analogue and Digital Digital
Odometer Digital Digital
Standard Warranty (Years) 2 ...
Standard Warranty (kilometers) 30000 ...

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which bike is better for high racing performance among Pulsar 220F and KTM RC200?
  • Definitely RC200. 220f is only good for drag racing, it is too stiff around corners. 220f is definitely not a track bike.
  • For high racing performance go with KTM RC200...for all rounder and daily purpose Pulsar 220F is best...
  • Rc200
View All Answers
Q. Which one is better R15 v3 or KTM RC 200?
  • We rode the new R15 v3.0 on both the racetrack and in the real world. While the R15 has grown larger and more powerful, it needs a certain level of expertise to tame. The more committed ergonomics make for an uncomfortable ride in the city. If you are looking for a dynamically competent bike that you’d like to hone your riding skills on and don't mind the committed riding position, the Yamaha R15 v 3.0 is the one to go for. It's a bike we'd love to have in our garage but its ergonomics limit its practicality. That's the reason it can not be our primary everyday bike. On the other hand, the RC 200 has set the bar quite high for the entry-level sports bike segment. The committed ergonomics might not be everyone’s cup of tea but if you are looking for cornering dynamics with an added dose of power but are on a budget, your search ends here.Read More: - 2017 KTM RC 200: First Ride Review In Images: https://www.zigwheels.com/gallery/bikesslideshow/2017-ktm-rc-200-first-ride-review-in-images/27324/1/1 - Yamaha R15 v3.0 Road Test Review: https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/yamaha-r15-v30-road-test-review/30566/
  • Both are best in there own ways.For RC 200:1)Engine is much better than R15 V3 2) Initial power is more3)Fuel Efficiency:35-45 km/L4) Maintenance cost is more comparing to V35)Top speed:138Km/H6)No vibration at all7) Excellent brightness for the both Dim & Highbeam For R15 V3:1) Fuel Efficiency:45-502) Maintenance cost is less3) Initial power is less comparing to Rc2004)Top speed: 160Km/H 5)Low brightness for the headlights
  • RC 200 much better option than R15 V3 but only if you budget permits it provides an adjustable suspension with the very other body that can do well on track as well as on normal roads but if you are running short on budget then go for an 583 has optimum performance with in its budget.
View All Answers
Q. Sir, which bike is best in pulsar 220 f and yamaha r15 v3?
  • I think u go for pulsar 220 f.because as maintenance wise it will cost u low. not very aggressive position . u r wrist will not get pain after long drive.even if u have girlfriend on u r rear.even if she stick with u r back when u riding u will not feel weight. 😄. So go for pulsar 200f
  • Its depend on your choice. i like pulsur 220f. But now it costs around 1.3lkh and R15 v3 costs around 1.4lkh. 220f is a beast. R15v3 is also a good bike. Some extra spec in R15 v3. speedometer design , build design , ABS , and mileage 40km/l. your choice to choose your best bike.
  • @Shaik_khadar, it is really hard to pinpoint that which bike is more reliable to ride. Few points we differ here : - P200F is coming up with BS4 engine but still has the same build quality where you would get a fresh generation-build in R15v3 - R15v3 has a very aggressive riding style where P220F has family build - Gear shifting difference between both of them - and yes, definitely mileage difference you can see I hope below link would help you to clear your confusion - https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/bajaj-pulsar-220f-vs-yamaha-yzf-r15-v3
View All Answers
View More Questions