Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs KTM Duke 200 Comparison
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs KTM Duke 200
KTM 200 Duke Price starts at Rs. 1.62 lakh which is Rs. 53,926 costlier than Bajaj Pulsar 220 F priced at Rs. 1.08 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is 40 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for KTM 200 Duke is 35 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is powered by 220 cc engine where as KTM 200 Duke is powered by 199.5 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is available in 7 different colours while KTM 200 Duke comes with 4 colours. 52% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar 220 F over KTM 200 Duke in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs KTM 200 Duke on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Pulsar 220 F vs 200 Duke Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Pulsar 220 F ABS | 200 Duke BS6 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.08 lakh | Rs. 1.72 lakh |
| Engine Type | 4-stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSIV Compliant, DTS-I Engine, Oil cooled | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 220 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 20.93 PS @ 8500 rpm | 25 PS @ 10,000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.9s | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 40 kmpl | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | 4-stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSIV Compliant, DTS-I Engine, Oil cooled | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 220 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 20.93 PS @ 8500 rpm | 25 PS @ 10,000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 18.55 Nm @ 7000 rpm | 19.3 Nm @ 8000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs6 |
| Bore | ... | 72 mm |
| Stroke | ... | 49 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Digital Twin Spark | Digital Ignition |
| Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.3:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 6 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.9s | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 40 kmpl | ... |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic With Anti - Friction Bush | WP-USD Ø 43 mm |
| Chassis | ... | Split Steel Trellis Frame |
| Suspension-Rear | 5 Way Adjustable Nitrox Shock Absorber | WP-Monoshock |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-120/80-17 | Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 28 psi | ... |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | ... | 150.3 kg |
| Length*Width*Height | 2035*750*1165 | 2050*730*810 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1350 mm | 1367 mm |
| Length | 2035 mm | 2050 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 165 mm | 170 mm |
| Height | 1165 mm | 810 mm |
| Seat Height | 795 mm | 810 mm |
| Width | 750 mm | 730 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 15 L | 13.5 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 260 mm | 300 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 230 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Full DC | ... |
| Pilot Lamps | ... | |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | LED |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Tachometer | Analogue | ... |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Average Fuel economy | ... | |
| Distance to Empty | ... | |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | ||
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ... | |
| Passenger Backrest | ... | |
| Cooling System | Oil Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Analogue and Digital | Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | ... | |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | ... |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 30000 | ... |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. If we have to choose between Pulsar 220F and KTM Duke 200 which should we choose?
- If your budget is up to 1.30 L then pulsar 220F and If your budget is up to 1.70 L then KTM Duke 200 If your from middle class family then go for pulsar 220f , Duke price is high, maintenance high, mileage gives less than pulsar. If you are planning to have KTM for enjoyment then go for it and when u feel it's loosing my pocket money then sale it back and buy pulsar 220F . This advice is only for students. If you are well educated, employee... Then go for KTM. No doubt if you have money then go for KTM 390 Duke also.
- Pulsar 220F Reason is I have exchanged my pulsar 220F with my friends KTM Duke 200 for few days and I feel the power and torque is more in KTM and yet safety factor is little less compared to 220F
- If u need both power n mileage go for 220f...If u dun care abt mileage u btr go for duke 200
Q. Sir, which bike is best in pulsar 220 f and yamaha r15 v3?
- I think u go for pulsar 220 f.because as maintenance wise it will cost u low. not very aggressive position . u r wrist will not get pain after long drive.even if u have girlfriend on u r rear.even if she stick with u r back when u riding u will not feel weight. 😄. So go for pulsar 200f
- Its depend on your choice. i like pulsur 220f. But now it costs around 1.3lkh and R15 v3 costs around 1.4lkh. 220f is a beast. R15v3 is also a good bike. Some extra spec in R15 v3. speedometer design , build design , ABS , and mileage 40km/l. your choice to choose your best bike.
- @Shaik_khadar, it is really hard to pinpoint that which bike is more reliable to ride. Few points we differ here : - P200F is coming up with BS4 engine but still has the same build quality where you would get a fresh generation-build in R15v3 - R15v3 has a very aggressive riding style where P220F has family build - Gear shifting difference between both of them - and yes, definitely mileage difference you can see I hope below link would help you to clear your confusion - https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/bajaj-pulsar-220f-vs-yamaha-yzf-r15-v3
Q. What is difference between ABS and STD?
- Anti lock braking system or ABS was been there since a very long time back but not so popular in India mainly because of the price,but was a very useful safety features. In ABS, when the brake was suddenly pressed, the wheel will not lock up and your tyres will not skid.This is very useful during rain or on muddy surfaces where traction are low.The sensor present on the wheel itself detect any sudden changes in wheel speed or if the wheel is going to lose traction.It will help you by engaging and disengaging brakes automatically so you can stop safely without skidding. In non abs, braking was more risky at high speeds and stopping distance is much longer then an abs version. The only difference in a pulsar220 is that in an ABS version there will be ABS sensor at the front disc and real wheel lift protection was there which is much safer.It is a single channel abs because of price concern but is more then enough.
- Abs is very important for your safety. So i prefer abs version.. STD means standard braking ABS means automatic braking; prevents braking locking up wheel if hard braking. Abs is anti lock breaking system.
- ABS is ANTILOCK BREAKING SYSTEMSTD IS I don't know it's long form.but if u apply rear break u r front wheel also come slow down. this system is comes with below 125cc bike's.
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
