Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs Hero XPulse 200 Comparison
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs Hero XPulse 200
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F Price starts at Rs. 1.08 lakh which is Rs. 9,827 costlier than Hero XPulse 200 priced at Rs. 98,500. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is 40 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Hero XPulse 200 is 55 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is powered by 220 cc engine where as Hero XPulse 200 is powered by 199.6 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is available in 7 different colours while Hero XPulse 200 comes with 1 colours. 65% users have chosen Hero Moto Corp XPulse 200 over Bajaj Pulsar 220 F in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs Hero XPulse 200 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Pulsar 220 F vs XPulse 200 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Pulsar 220 F ABS | XPulse 200 Fi |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.08 lakh | Rs. 1.07 lakh |
| Engine Type | 4-stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSIV Compliant, DTS-I Engine, Oil cooled | Air-cooled, 4 Stroke 2 Valve Single cylinder OHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 220 cc | 199.6 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 20.93 PS @ 8500 rpm | 18.4 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.9s | 5.13s |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 40 kmpl | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-533.4 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Spoke |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Kick and Self Start |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | 4-stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSIV Compliant, DTS-I Engine, Oil cooled | Air-cooled, 4 Stroke 2 Valve Single cylinder OHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 220 cc | 199.6 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 20.93 PS @ 8500 rpm | 18.4 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 18.55 Nm @ 7000 rpm | 17.1 Nm @ 6500 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| Bore | 66.5 mm | |
| Stroke | 57.5 mm | |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Digital Twin Spark | Digital DC CDI Ignition System |
| Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10:01 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 5 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.9s | 5.13s |
| Quarter Mile | 19.50 s @ 104.74 kmph | |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 25.00m | |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 45.20m | |
| Mileage (City) | 46.40 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Highway) | 42.75 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Overall) | 55 kmpl | |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 40 kmpl | |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 16.66s | |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 25.00m |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic With Anti - Friction Bush | Telescopic with Double DU Bush |
| Chassis | Diamond type | |
| Suspension-Rear | 5 Way Adjustable Nitrox Shock Absorber | 10 step Rider-adjustable Monoshock |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-120/80-17 | Front :-90/90-21 Rear :-120/80-18 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-533.4 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tube |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | Yes |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Spoke |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 28 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2035*750*1165 | 2223*850*1257 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1350 mm | 1412 mm |
| Length | 2035 mm | 2223 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 165 mm | 220 mm |
| Height | 1165 mm | 1257 mm |
| Seat Height | 795 mm | 823 mm |
| Width | 750 mm | 850 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 15 L | 13 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 260 mm | 276 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 220 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Full DC | MF |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Bikes | Adventure Tourer Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Kick and Self Start |
| Seat Type | Split | Single |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Tachometer | Analogue | |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Charging point | No | |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | |
| Clock | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | Yes | |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | Yes | |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ||
| Cooling System | Oil Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Analogue and Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Navigation | Yes |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 30000 |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Similar Bike Comparisons
-
XPulse 200Rs. 98,500vsXPulse 200 vs Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0Rs. 1.12 lakh
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Sir, which bike is best in pulsar 220 f and yamaha r15 v3?
- I think u go for pulsar 220 f.because as maintenance wise it will cost u low. not very aggressive position . u r wrist will not get pain after long drive.even if u have girlfriend on u r rear.even if she stick with u r back when u riding u will not feel weight. 😄. So go for pulsar 200f
- Its depend on your choice. i like pulsur 220f. But now it costs around 1.3lkh and R15 v3 costs around 1.4lkh. 220f is a beast. R15v3 is also a good bike. Some extra spec in R15 v3. speedometer design , build design , ABS , and mileage 40km/l. your choice to choose your best bike.
- @Shaik_khadar, it is really hard to pinpoint that which bike is more reliable to ride. Few points we differ here : - P200F is coming up with BS4 engine but still has the same build quality where you would get a fresh generation-build in R15v3 - R15v3 has a very aggressive riding style where P220F has family build - Gear shifting difference between both of them - and yes, definitely mileage difference you can see I hope below link would help you to clear your confusion - https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/bajaj-pulsar-220f-vs-yamaha-yzf-r15-v3
Q. What is difference between ABS and STD?
- Anti lock braking system or ABS was been there since a very long time back but not so popular in India mainly because of the price,but was a very useful safety features. In ABS, when the brake was suddenly pressed, the wheel will not lock up and your tyres will not skid.This is very useful during rain or on muddy surfaces where traction are low.The sensor present on the wheel itself detect any sudden changes in wheel speed or if the wheel is going to lose traction.It will help you by engaging and disengaging brakes automatically so you can stop safely without skidding. In non abs, braking was more risky at high speeds and stopping distance is much longer then an abs version. The only difference in a pulsar220 is that in an ABS version there will be ABS sensor at the front disc and real wheel lift protection was there which is much safer.It is a single channel abs because of price concern but is more then enough.
- Abs is very important for your safety. So i prefer abs version.. STD means standard braking ABS means automatic braking; prevents braking locking up wheel if hard braking. Abs is anti lock breaking system.
- ABS is ANTILOCK BREAKING SYSTEMSTD IS I don't know it's long form.but if u apply rear break u r front wheel also come slow down. this system is comes with below 125cc bike's.
Q. Which is better between Pulsar 220 F and NS 200?
- Both of them are different categories. Both are good on their ground. If you need half fairing beautiful look then Pulsar 220F and if you need more speed and naked model and high pickup then you can choose NS 200. Absolutely you will say NS 200 is better because of its power and it also has naked wonderful look. It's up to you.
- Depends on you.220 is semi faired while ns200 is a naked streetfighter. Both are good in their own way.Ns is a bit more powerful and is liquid cooled while 220 is only oil cooled.In terms of handling the ns is a bit better while 220 has better fuel economy and is more suited for long riding or touring.
- Both bikes r Better in there own category. it's up to u which is u r favourite bike or it's depends upon riding condition. what type of u r rider..
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
