Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs Bajaj Pulsar RS200 Comparison
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs Bajaj Pulsar RS200
Bajaj Pulsar RS200 Price starts at Rs. 1.42 lakh which is Rs. 33,606 costlier than Bajaj Pulsar 220 F priced at Rs. 1.08 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is 40 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is 35 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is powered by 220 cc engine where as Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is available in 7 different colours while Bajaj Pulsar RS200 comes with 7 colours. 59% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar RS200 over Bajaj Pulsar 220 F in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs Bajaj Pulsar RS200 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Pulsar 220 F vs Pulsar RS200 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Pulsar 220 F ABS | Pulsar RS200 Dual ABS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.08 lakh | Rs. 1.43 lakh |
| Engine Type | 4-stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSIV Compliant, DTS-I Engine, Oil cooled | Single Cylinder, 4-Valve, Triple Spark, DTS-i Engine, liquid Cooled |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 220 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 20.93 PS @ 8500 rpm | 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.9s | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 40 kmpl | 35 kmpl |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | 4-stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSIV Compliant, DTS-I Engine, Oil cooled | Single Cylinder, 4-Valve, Triple Spark, DTS-i Engine, liquid Cooled |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 220 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 20.93 PS @ 8500 rpm | 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 18.55 Nm @ 7000 rpm | 18.6 Nm @ 8000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Digital Twin Spark | ... |
| Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.2:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 6 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.9s | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 40 kmpl | 35 kmpl |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic With Anti - Friction Bush | Telescopic With Anti Friction Bush |
| Chassis | ... | Perimeter Frame |
| Suspension-Rear | 5 Way Adjustable Nitrox Shock Absorber | Nitrox Mono Shock Absorber with Canister |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-120/80-17 | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-130/70-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 28 psi | 25 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2035*750*1165 | 1999*765*1114 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1350 mm | 1345 mm |
| Length | 2035 mm | 1999 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 165 mm | 157 mm |
| Height | 1165 mm | 1114 mm |
| Seat Height | 795 mm | 800 mm |
| Width | 750 mm | 765 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 15 L | 13 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 260 mm | 300 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 230 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Full DC | DC MF |
| Pilot Lamps | ... | |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | LED |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Bikes | Sports Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Tachometer | Analogue | Analogue |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | ||
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | Dual Projector | |
| Cooling System | Oil Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Analogue and Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | 2 |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 30000 | 24000 |
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which one should I buy Pulsar 220 F or RS 200? Please answer if you have hands on experience
- If u have good budget then buy pulsar RS 200 ABS Because it is smooth it gives good milage and u can also use it for long distance travelling.
- Go for RS 200 if you have good budget .. 220F is also worth and good for its price .. but rs 200 has better refined engine and technology
- Pulsar 220 owesom look superb pickup and very good handling suberb milage go for 220
Q. Which bike is best among Yamaha YZF R15 V3, Pulsar 220 F and Pulsar RS 200?
- See , all bikes are good in their places .. if you want more torque and mid range power then go for rs 200 or 220F abs model 2019 . R15 is good but its build quality is not that good .. mid range power is less in comparison to 220f and rs 200 because r15 is 155cc engine and 220f and rs200 are 200cc engine so it has more initial power than r15 v3 .. I prefer you should go with rs200 .. its more reliable and strong build quality with abs and all .. if you have more queries then you can ask anytime.
- If you are looking for complete sporty you can go for R15 V3 OR Pulsar RS 200 but maintenance is bit costlier If you are looking for daily usage go for 220 f is the bestAnd 220f is cheaper to maintain
- You should buy pulsar RS 200 because it is good in all aspects of bike riding
Q. Which is best pulsar ns200 or rs200?
- The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is a comfortable city bike with plenty of grunt and agility for a quick race off the traffic lights and to tackle some twisties as well. But the engine feels too strained out on the highway. Also, ergonomically, with the high-set footpegs it’s a tight spot for someone taller than 5 feet 10 inches. Even the brakes fail to inspire confidence under hard braking. Luckily though, TVS does offer ABS as an option. But then, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 also gets ABS, a single-channel unit. Apart from that, the Bajaj is also a more well rounded motorcycle that does everything just right. The ride quality too is better on the Bajaj. So, if your daily riding consists more of city commutes, the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is the way to go. But if you are looking to ride your bike out on the highway as well, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a more potent tool to opt for.
- The Pulsar RS200 has proved to be a masterstroke for the Chakan-based manufacturer. It is a well-rounded package with a good balance of performance and handling without compromising on comfort. What sweetens the deal further is the added safety net of ABS, the fresh design update, and the competitive pricing. On the other hand, Pulsar NS200 comes across as a well-rounded package that can efficiently take on almost every kind of task required. Be it charging into corners, riding flat out on highways or manage daily chores with ease, the Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 makes a strong case for itself. It offers good grunt, stopping power and well-balanced ergonomics which makes it an all-rounder. Click on the link to compare them: https://bit.ly/2zT6uqV
- RS 200 makes very high frequency vibration but it looks super. RS 200's engine is better than NS200 . I'm don't recommend to buy NS or RS. If your budget is low than you can buy it. I'm recommend to buy Duke 200 or Dominar 400 Both are best for tour and very comfortable. Upgrade your budget up-to 2lacks and buy DUKE 200 or DOMINAR 400
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
