Bajaj Avenger Street 220 vs Suzuki Intruder Comparison
Bajaj Avenger Street 220 vs Suzuki Intruder
Bajaj Avenger Street 220 Price starts at Rs. 1.05 lakh which is Rs. 3,725 costlier than Suzuki Intruder priced at Rs. 1.01 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Avenger Street 220 is 45 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Suzuki Intruder is 47.6 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Avenger Street 220 is powered by 220 cc engine where as Suzuki Intruder is powered by 154.9 cc engine. Bajaj Avenger Street 220 is available in 6 different colours while Suzuki Intruder comes with 1 colours. 58% users have chosen Bajaj Avenger Street 220 over Suzuki Intruder in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Avenger Street 220 vs Suzuki Intruder on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Avenger Street 220 vs Intruder Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Avenger Street 220 Standard | Intruder Fi |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.05 lakh | Rs. 1.08 lakh |
| Engine Type | Twin spark, 2 valve. DTS-i engine, oil-cooled | 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, Air-cooled |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 220 cc | 154.9 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 19.03 PS @ 8400 rpm | 14.8 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ... | 5.53s |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 45 kmpl | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-381 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Cast |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | Twin spark, 2 valve. DTS-i engine, oil-cooled | 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, Air-cooled |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 220 cc | 154.9 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 19.03 PS @ 8400 rpm | 14.8 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 17.5 Nm @ 7000 rpm | 14 Nm @ 6000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| Bore | ... | 56 mm |
| Stroke | ... | 62.9 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Digital Twin Spark Ignition | ... |
| Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | ... |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 5 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ... | 5.53s |
| Quarter Mile | ... | 20.01 s @ 102.55 kmph |
| Mileage (City) | ... | 50 kmpl |
| Mileage (Highway) | ... | 57.8 kmpl |
| Mileage (Overall) | ... | 52 kmpl |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 45 kmpl | ... |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | ... | 18.42s |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic With Anti Friction Bush | Telescopic |
| Suspension-Rear | Twin Shock Absorber | Swing Arm Type |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/90-17, Rear :- 130/90-15 | Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/60-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-381 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ... | |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Cast |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 21 psi | ... |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2210*806*1070 | 2130*805*1095 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1490 mm | 1405 mm |
| Length | 2210 mm | 2130 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 169 mm | 170 mm |
| Height | 1070 mm | 1095 mm |
| Seat Height | ... | 740 mm |
| Width | 806 mm | 805 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 13 L | 11 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 260 mm | ... |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 130 mm | ... |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Maintenance Free | Maintenance Free |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Cruiser Bikes | Cruiser Bikes |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Clock | Digital | |
| Low Battery Indicator | ... | |
| Stepup Seat | With Low Slung Seating | |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ... | |
| Passenger Backrest | Sporty | |
| Cooling System | Oil Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| DRLs | ... |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | ... |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 30000 | ... |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Similar Bike Comparisons
-
Avenger Street 220Rs. 1.05 lakhvsAvenger Street 220 vs FZ-S Fi Version 3.0FZ-S Fi Version 3.0Rs. 98,680
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. I am 51 years old. My daily travllaling is 50/60km in city. I have back problems. Which bike should I buy Intruder, Avenger, FZ 25 or Suzuki SF 250?
- You are 51 year old so intruder looks does not suits you as well as it build is of plastic which is prone very easily to damages ,while fz sitting position is not for 50km ride yet handling is good and in avenger the comfort is very good handling mileage pickup seat cushion as well as classy look suits the riding of 50kms ,rest of all is your wish and personal requirements
- Avenger street is best for City use and also long hauls. Negate the critics, is totally wrong and pointless reviews. Very underrated bike but I'm really happy I actually bought the Street even after seeing all the negative reviews. I felt very lucky that the bike turned out to be nothing like the negative reviews.
- Regarding the back problems that you have mentioned there's no better ride comfort that can be provided by any other bike as much the avenger series provide. You should surely go for Bajaj's avenger.
Q. Which is better for buy Avenger 180cc or 220cc
- The Bajaj Avenger Street 220 is a more-urban focused version of the Cruise 220. So, based on your preference and riding style, you can choose either one as they are the same underneath. Street 220 offers fantastic value for money. The Pulsar 220-sourced engine delivers a fine balance between power and frugality, with a lot more oomph factor compared to the previous generation model. On the other hand, Bajaj Avenger 180 replaces the Avenger 150 for a price bump of Rs 5,000. For this premium, it not only gets more power than the model it replaces but also its rival, the Suzuki Intruder 150. The style and feature upgrades have given it a modern look, while not feeling overly done, unlike the Intruder 150. Add to that Suzuki’s asking price of around Rs 15,000 over the Bajaj Avenger 180 and the Bajaj comes across as a great value-for-money motorcycle. More so, when you can use the saved cash to buy a good set of riding gear for those long weekend rides. Ultimately, it boils down to your requirement. Do take a test ride in order to judge your riding comfort.
- Bajaj Avenger Street 220 is a more-urban focused version of the Cruise 220. So, based on your preference and riding style, you can choose either one as they are the same underneath. Street 220 offers fantastic value for money. The Pulsar 220-sourced engine delivers a fine balance between power and frugality, with a lot more oomph factor compared to the previous generation model. It is also the most affordable of all cruisers in this segment.
- Actually, till the gear box design of Avenger 220 is not revised / rectified properly,(I am suffering/ weeping with the same since last so many years) along with anumber of other vital and fatal designing defects in this vehicle, I must claim, it has never been worth riding and is a sample of poor craftsmanship, inefficient andbadly engineered design and employment of under-specification electrical andmechanical components.
Q. I am planning to buy Avenger. Not sure whether to choose 220 or 180. I need to decide based upon mileage between the two.
- Avenger 180 and 150 segment is switch over to 220 and 160 model.I bought 220 avenger its gives 40 KMPL for me.
- 220 is better choice since the cost between the two is marginal and better to buy a higher capacity bike when your already spending to buy it.
- There is just an slightly difference in its mielege between this two bikes buy 180cc street gives an 5-8 km more than the avenger street 220
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
