Bajaj Avenger Cruise 220 vs Jawa 42 Comparison
Bajaj Avenger Cruise 220 vs Jawa 42
Jawa 42 Price starts at Rs. 1.55 lakh which is Rs. 50,212 costlier than Bajaj Avenger Cruise 220 priced at Rs. 1.05 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Avenger Cruise 220 is 45 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Jawa 42 is 37 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Avenger Cruise 220 is powered by 220 cc engine where as Jawa 42 is powered by 293 cc engine. Bajaj Avenger Cruise 220 is available in 6 different colours while Jawa 42 comes with 1 colours. 71% users have chosen Jawa Motorcycles 42 over Bajaj Avenger Cruise 220 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Avenger Cruise 220 vs Jawa 42 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Avenger Cruise 220 vs 42 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Avenger Cruise 220 Standard | 42 Double Disc |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.05 lakh | Rs. 1.64 lakh |
| Engine Type | Twin Spark, 2 valve. DTS-i engine Oil Cooled | Liquid Cooled, Single Cylinder, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 220 cc | 293 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 19.03 PS @ 8400 rpm | 27.3 PS |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Disc |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 45 kmpl | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-381 mm | Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Spoke | Spoke |
| ABS | Single Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Analogue |
Engine
| Engine Type | Twin Spark, 2 valve. DTS-i engine Oil Cooled | Liquid Cooled, Single Cylinder, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 220 cc | 293 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 19.03 PS @ 8400 rpm | 27.3 PS |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 17.5 Nm @ 7000 rpm | 28 Nm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| Bore | 76 mm | |
| Stroke | 65 mm | |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Digital Twin Spark Ignition | |
| Compression Ratio | 11:1 | |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 6 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Disc |
Performance
| Mileage (Overall) | 37 kmpl | |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 45 kmpl |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic With Anti Friction Bush | Telescopic Hydraulic Fork |
| Chassis | Tubular Double Cradle | Double Cradle |
| Suspension-Rear | Twin Shock Absorber | Gas Canister - Twin shock hydraulic |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/90-17, Rear :- 130/90-15 | Front :-90/90-18 Rear :-120/80-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-381 mm | Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tube | Tube |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Spoke | Spoke |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 21 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2210*806*1321 | |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1490 mm | 1369 mm |
| Length | 2210 mm | |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 169 mm | |
| Height | 1321 mm | |
| Seat Height | 765 mm | |
| Width | 806 mm | |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 13 L | 14 L |
| Tail Light | LED | Bulb |
| Front Brake Diameter | 260 mm | 280 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 130 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Maintenance Free | |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Cruiser Bikes | Cruiser Bikes |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Single | Single |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Digital | Analogue |
| Trip Meter | Digital | |
| Clock | Digital | |
| Low Battery Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Stepup Seat | With Low Slung Seating | |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Passenger Backrest | Cushioned | |
| Cooling System | Oil Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Analogue and Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Mobile Connectivity | No | |
| DRLs | Yes |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 30000 |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Similar Bike Comparisons
-
Avenger Cruise 220Rs. 1.05 lakhvsAvenger Cruise 220 vs FZ-S Fi Version 3.0FZ-S Fi Version 3.0Rs. 98,680
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Shall I go for Avenger or Jawa 42?
- Both are different kind of bike with different segment. Avenger is a cruiser which is suitable for longer ride while jawa' s sitting position is little sporty . Engine capacity also different. So if are looking for bike for longer ride than avenger is suitable for you and if you are looking for a classic looking bike with performance than jawa will suitable for you
- Avenger will cost you around 1.10 lakhs after taxes.While Jawa 42 will cost you around 1.70 lakhs approx after taxes.Select the bike which is suitable for you.Avenger is Cruiser while Jawa is a Retero Bike!!
- Both are good bike. In Price,service cost,spare parts cost, avenger is best,
Q. Which is better between Royal Enfield Classic 350 and Jawa 42 - 42 - 42 - 42?
- The Jawa 42 sits between the different Royal Enfield Classic 350 variants that are on offer currently. It offers a retro design with modern underpinnings that should perform well. What’s more, it is likely to be more reliable in the long run as well. Meanwhile, the Royal Enfield Classic 350 looks more modern but should offer an old school feels thanks to its motor. You also get more variants to choose from as well as a rear disc brake and dual-channel ABS. Ultimately the Jawa 42 offers a modern bike with a classic design while the Royal Enfield Classic 350 is a retro-modern design with old school mechanicals, which makes it feel like you’re riding something from an era gone by. While comparing these two Classic Legends we have only one thing to say that "Legends are not meant to compare there are meant to ride". So suggest you to take a test ride of both the Legendary motorcycles to know which one is better for you.Royal Enfield Classic 350 Vs Jawa 300: Spec Comparison :- https://www.zigwheels.com/news-features/news/royal-enfield-classic-350-vs-jawa-300-spec-comparison/32303/ Jawa 42 vs Royal Enfield Bullet 350 Comparison:- https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/jawa-motorcycles-42-vs-royal-enfield-bullet-350-twinspark
- I hope ajay is little but prejudicial towards 350x because his every answer is negative for jawa. However jawa supersedes in performance, built and ergonomics. From the 27 bhp which is jawa as compared to the 19 bhp of 350x, jawa is comparable to the 500x which gives the same bhp. Now lets talk about the vibrations of 350x, on the other hand jawa gives you a very smooth ride. Now lets talk about the pricing for jawa 42 which is 1.55 lacs ex showroom which is approx 20 k less than 350x. The same is with the kerb weight for which jawa offers the machine for 170 kgs on the other hand 350x weighs 190kgs. And yes taller persons can eaily ride jawa.
- Very subjective.. you need to ride both to decide. Both induce different kind of feelings because of their respective engine types. The engine tech and dual abs definitely make the Jawa a more modern machine.. having said that.. do take a test ride of both before you make a decision
Q. Which is better Avenger cruise or street 220?
- The Bajaj Avenger Street 220 is a more-urban focused version of the Cruise 220. So, based on your preference and riding style, you can choose either one as they are the same underneath. Yes, the Street 220 doesn’t come with a backrest for the pillion. If that is a point of concern, the Cruise 220 is the way to go. Otherwise, the Street 220 offers fantastic value for money. The Bajaj Avenger Cruise 220 is amongst the most popular cruisers on sale in India, offering fantastic value for money proposition. The Pulsar 220-sourced engine delivers a fine balance between power and frugality with a lot more oomph than the previous generation model. It is also the most affordable of all cruisers mentioned above.
- Both cruise 220 and street are having same heart ,that is 220cc engine but 220 cruise is looking more classic with its lots of chrome inserts and additionally a wind shield but you should wait till 2019 for new govt. Norms for ABS mandatory for theses bike because I am riding 220 cruise and I am little disappointed with its braking . So as per me u should wait till 2019 for ABS version of avenger range.
- If you're looking out for the 220cc engine, then its up to you w.r.t the looks. If you're more of that street rider, then look for the Street. Its got the handle bars designed for the streets. Cruise is got more of that highway riding posture. Its more comfortable on the highways and if you're from a place where you got good roads, less traffic, then go for the Avenger Cruise 220.
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
